Literature DB >> 25236338

The stiffness and structure of three-dimensional printed hydrogels direct the differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells toward adipogenic and osteogenic lineages.

Daniela F Duarte Campos1, Andreas Blaeser, Anne Korsten, Sabine Neuss, Jörg Jäkel, Michael Vogt, Horst Fischer.   

Abstract

The mechanical and physicochemical effects of three-dimensional (3D) printable hydrogels on cell behavior are paramount features to consider before manufacturing functional tissues. We hypothesize that besides good printability and cytocompatibility of a supporting hydrogel for the manufacture of individual tissues, it is equally essential to consider beforehand the desired tissue (bone, cartilage, fat). In light of its application, the structure and stiffness of printable hydrogel matrices influence cell geometry, which in turn impacts the differentiation fate. Embedded human mesenchymal stromal cells in printable type I collagen- and chitosan-agarose blends were induced to differentiate toward osteoblasts and adipocytes. Hydrogels' printability in air versus submerged printing in perfluorocarbon was evaluated according to the height, diameter, uniformity, and stability of 3D printed vertical cylinders. Bipotent differentiation within hydrogels was assessed histologically (morphology, cellularity), by immunohistochemistry (vimentin, smooth muscle actin), two-photon microscopy (spatial distribution), and real-time polymerase chain reaction (ALP, BGLAP, OPN, RUNX2, COL 1, aP2, PPARγ-2). Agarose and agarose blends revealed the most valid printability properties by generating uniform cylinders with an average height of 4 mm. Osteogenic differentiation was preferably achieved in anisotropic soft collagen-rich substrates, whereas adipogenic differentiation mostly occurred in isotropic stiff agarose-rich matrices. The conjugation of type I collagen to agarose with varying ratios is possibly a suitable bioink for a broad range of 3D printed mesenchymal tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25236338     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2014.0231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  35 in total

1.  An In Vitro Investigation of Platelet-Rich Plasma-Gel as a Cell and Growth Factor Delivery Vehicle for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jagoda M Jalowiec; Matteo D'Este; Jennifer Jane Bara; Jessica Denom; Ursula Menzel; Mauro Alini; Sophie Verrier; Marietta Herrmann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 2.  Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  C F Marques; G S Diogo; S Pina; J M Oliveira; T H Silva; R L Reis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Three-dimensional bioprinting of stem-cell derived tissues for human regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Gregor Skeldon; Baltasar Lucendo-Villarin; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Controlled dissolution of freeform 3D printed carbohydrate glass scaffolds in hydrogels using a hydrophobic spray coating.

Authors:  M C Gryka; T J Comi; R A Forsyth; P M Hadley; S Deb; R Bhargava
Journal:  Addit Manuf       Date:  2018-12-27

5.  An Injectable Hydrogel as Bone Graft Material with Added Antimicrobial Properties.

Authors:  Giacomo Tommasi; Stefano Perni; Polina Prokopovich
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Bioink Formulation and Machine Learning-Empowered Bioprinting Optimization.

Authors:  Sebastian Freeman; Stefano Calabro; Roma Williams; Sha Jin; Kaiming Ye
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 7.  Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.

Authors:  Sang Cheon Lee; Gregory Gillispie; Peter Prim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 8.  Recent advances in 3D bioprinting of musculoskeletal tissues.

Authors:  Tyler Potyondy; Jorge Alfredo Uquillas; Peyton J Tebon; Batzaya Byambaa; Anwarul Hasan; Maryam Tavafoghi; Heloise Mary; George E Aninwene; Ippokratis Pountos; Ali Khademhosseini; Nureddin Ashammakhi
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 9.  Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting.

Authors:  Liqun Ning; Carmen J Gil; Boeun Hwang; Andrea S Theus; Lilanni Perez; Martin L Tomov; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 19.162

10.  Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress.

Authors:  Sara Cristina Pedroza-González; Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador; Baruc Emet Pérez-Benítez; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.