Literature DB >> 33166949

Recent advances in 3D bioprinting of musculoskeletal tissues.

Tyler Potyondy1,2,3, Jorge Alfredo Uquillas4, Peyton J Tebon1,2, Batzaya Byambaa5,6, Anwarul Hasan7,8, Maryam Tavafoghi1,2, Heloise Mary1,9, George E Aninwene1,2,10, Ippokratis Pountos11,12, Ali Khademhosseini1,2,13,14,15, Nureddin Ashammakhi1,2,3,13,16.   

Abstract

The musculoskeletal system is essential for maintaining posture, protecting organs, facilitating locomotion, and regulating various cellular and metabolic functions. Injury to this system due to trauma or wear is common, and severe damage may require surgery to restore function and prevent further harm. Autografts are the current gold standard for the replacement of lost or damaged tissues. However, these grafts are constrained by limited supply and donor site morbidity. Allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic materials represent viable alternatives, but each of these methods also has its own problems and limitations. Technological advances in three-dimensional (3D) printing and its biomedical adaptation, 3D bioprinting, have the potential to provide viable, autologous tissue-like constructs that can be used to repair musculoskeletal defects. Though bioprinting is currently unable to develop mature, implantable tissues, it can pattern cells in 3D constructs with features facilitating maturation and vascularization. Further advances in the field may enable the manufacture of constructs that can mimic native tissues in complexity, spatial heterogeneity, and ultimately, clinical utility. This review studies the use of 3D bioprinting for engineering bone, cartilage, muscle, tendon, ligament, and their interface tissues. Additionally, the current limitations and challenges in the field are discussed and the prospects for future progress are highlighted.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D bioprinting; bone; graft; musculoskeletal; tissue defects; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33166949      PMCID: PMC8312688          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/abc8de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  162 in total

1.  A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity.

Authors:  Hyun-Wook Kang; Sang Jin Lee; In Kap Ko; Carlos Kengla; James J Yoo; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Scar formation and ligament healing.

Authors:  K A Hildebrand; C B Frank
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Distinct tissue formation by heterogeneous printing of osteo- and endothelial progenitor cells.

Authors:  Natalja E Fedorovich; Hans M Wijnberg; Wouter J A Dhert; Jacqueline Alblas
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  A versatile bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation.

Authors:  Matti Kesti; Michael Müller; Jana Becher; Matthias Schnabelrauch; Matteo D'Este; David Eglin; Marcy Zenobi-Wong
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Potential use of silkworm gut fiber braids as scaffolds for tendon and ligament tissue engineering.

Authors:  Ana Pagán; Salvador D Aznar-Cervantes; José Pérez-Rigueiro; Luis Meseguer-Olmo; Jose L Cenis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Homing and reparative effect of intra-articular injection of autologus mesenchymal stem cells in osteoarthritic animal model.

Authors:  Abir N Mokbel; Omar S El Tookhy; Ashraf A Shamaa; Laila A Rashed; Dina Sabry; Abeer M El Sayed
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Articular cartilage repair by gene therapy using growth factor-producing mesenchymal cells.

Authors:  Kolja Gelse; Klaus von der Mark; Thomas Aigner; Jung Park; Holm Schneider
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-02

8.  Repair of articular cartilage defect in non-weight bearing areas using adipose derived stem cells loaded polyglycolic acid mesh.

Authors:  Lei Cui; Yaohao Wu; Lian Cen; Heng Zhou; Shuo Yin; Guangpeng Liu; Wei Liu; Yilin Cao
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Bone regeneration in a rabbit critical-sized skull defect using autologous adipose-derived cells.

Authors:  Claudia Di Bella; Peter Farlie; Anthony J Penington
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Directed differentiation of BMSCs on structural/compositional gradient nanofibrous scaffolds for ligament-bone osteointegration.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Jiankang He; Weijie Zhang; Dichen Li; Yi Lv
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 7.328

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  New frontiers of tendon augmentation technology in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: a concise literature review.

Authors:  Rangarirai Makuku; Jean-David Werthel; Leila Oryadi Zanjani; Mohammad Hossein Nabian; Marcarious M Tantuoyir
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 1.573

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.