Literature DB >> 25234373

Prey perception of predation risk: volatile chemical cues mediate non-consumptive effects of a predator on a herbivorous insect.

Sara L Hermann1, Jennifer S Thaler.   

Abstract

Predators can affect prey in two ways-by reducing their density (consumptive effects) or by changing their behavior, physiology or other phenotypic traits (non-consumptive effects). Understanding the cues and sensory modalities prey use to detect predators is critical for predicting the strength of non-consumptive effects and the outcome of predator-prey encounters. While predator-associated cues have been well studied in aquatic systems, less is known about how terrestrial prey, particularly insect larvae, detect their predators. We evaluated how Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, larvae perceive predation risk by isolating cues from its stink bug predator, the spined soldier bug, Podisus maculiventris. When exposed to male "risk" predators that were surgically manipulated so they could hunt but not kill, beetles reduced feeding 29% compared to controls. Exposure to risk females caused an intermediate response. Beetles ate 24% less on leaves pre-exposed to predators compared to leaves never exposed to predators, indicating that tactile and visual cues are not required for the prey's response. Volatile odor cues from predators reduced beetle feeding by 10% overall, although male predators caused a stronger reduction than females. Finally, visual cues from the predator had a weak effect on beetle feeding. Because multiple cues appear to be involved in prey perception of risk, and because male and female predators have differential effects, beetle larvae likely experience tremendous variation in the information about risk from their local environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234373     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3069-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  23 in total

1.  Experimental evidence for a behavior-mediated trophic cascade in a terrestrial food chain.

Authors:  A P Beckerman; M Uriarte; O J Schmitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Compensatory mechanisms for ameliorating the fundamental trade-off between predator avoidance and foraging.

Authors:  Jennifer S Thaler; Scott H McArt; Ian Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Insect predators affect plant resistance via density- and trait-mediated indirect interactions.

Authors:  Celine A M Griffin; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 4.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin M Bolker; Mollie E Brooks; Connie J Clark; Shane W Geange; John R Poulsen; M Henry H Stevens; Jada-Simone S White
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Direct and indirect effects of predation and predation risk in old-field interaction webs.

Authors:  O J Schmitz
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Spider silk reduces insect herbivory.

Authors:  Ann L Rypstra; Christopher M Buddle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Volatile compounds from the predatory insectPodisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) : Male and female metathoracic scent gland and female dorsal abdominal gland secretions.

Authors:  J R Aldrich; W R Lusby; J P Kochansky; C B Abrams
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Effect of predator diet on life history shifts of red-legged frogs, Rana aurora.

Authors:  Joseph M Kiesecker; Douglas P Chivers; Michael Anderson; Andrew R Blaustein
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Effects of larval nutrition on the endocrinology of mosquito egg development.

Authors:  Aparna Telang; Yiping Li; Fernando G Noriega; Mark R Brown
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Highly selective tuning of a silkworm olfactory receptor to a key mulberry leaf volatile.

Authors:  Kana Tanaka; Yusuke Uda; Yukiteru Ono; Tatsuro Nakagawa; Makiko Suwa; Ryohei Yamaoka; Kazushige Touhara
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  18 in total

1.  Ecophysiological effects of predation risk; an integration across disciplines.

Authors:  Michael J Sheriff; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Does fear beget fear? Risk-mediated habitat selection triggers predator avoidance at lower trophic levels.

Authors:  Carmen K Blubaugh; Ivy V Widick; Ian Kaplan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Adaptation of Defensive Strategies by the Pea Aphid Mediates Predation Risk from the Predatory Lady Beetle.

Authors:  Li-Peng Fan; Fang Ouyang; Jian-Wei Su; Feng Ge
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The effect of predator presence on the behavioral sequence from host selection to reproduction in an invulnerable stage of insect prey.

Authors:  Sara L Hermann; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Risk Odors Deriving from Predator Abdominal Gland Secretions Mediate Non-Consumptive Effects on Prey.

Authors:  Jian Wen; Takatoshi Ueno
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Responses to predation risk cues and alarm pheromones affect plant virus transmission by an aphid vector.

Authors:  Benjamin W Lee; Saumik Basu; Sayanta Bera; Clare L Casteel; David W Crowder
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Fear of predation alters clone-specific performance in phloem-feeding prey.

Authors:  Mouhammad Shadi Khudr; Oksana Y Buzhdygan; Jana S Petermann; Susanne Wurst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Multi-species suppression of herbivores through consumptive and non-consumptive effects.

Authors:  Kathryn S Ingerslew; Deborah L Finke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The role of phytophagy by predators in shaping plant interactions with their pests.

Authors:  Maria L Pappas; Anke Steppuhn; George D Broufas
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2016-01-29

10.  Adult Prey Neutralizes Predator Nonconsumptive Limitation of Prey Recruitment.

Authors:  Julius A Ellrich; Ricardo A Scrosati; Katharina Romoth; Markus Molis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.