Literature DB >> 25232847

Carrier testing in children: exploration of genetic health professionals' practices in Australia.

Danya F Vears1, Clare Delany2, Lynn Gillam3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite genetic health professionals routinely providing carrier testing in adults, carrier testing in unaffected children after a sibling is diagnosed with a genetic condition remains controversial. The majority of international guidelines addressing genetic carrier testing in children recommend against providing this testing, yet little is known about current practice. This study aimed to determine whether genetic health professionals receive requests for carrier testing in unaffected children from parents of children with genetic conditions and whether they provide this testing.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 Australian genetic counselors and clinical geneticists and analyzed using inductive content analysis.
RESULTS: The genetic health professionals indicated that some parents do request carrier testing in their children, often after the diagnosis of a genetic condition in another child. Although all interviewees stated they initially advise against carrier testing, if the parents persist with their requests, then testing is occasionally provided. They indicated they consider factors such as the maturity of the child, anxiety of the parents, and potential medical benefit to make clinical judgments about when testing is appropriate, rather than relying solely on guidelines.
CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on current practices in carrier testing for children, validating this as an area that still requires attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25232847     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  29 in total

Review 1.  Inappropriate genetic testing of children.

Authors:  A Fryer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Carrier testing of children for two X-linked diseases: A retrospective study of comprehension of the test results and social and psychological significance of the testing.

Authors:  O Järvinen; A E Lehesjoki; M Lindlöf; A Uutela; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.

Authors:  U H Graneheim; B Lundman
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Predictive genetic testing in young people for adult-onset conditions: where is the empirical evidence?

Authors:  R E Duncan; M B Delatycki
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Genetic service providers' practices and attitudes regarding adolescent genetic testing for carrier status.

Authors:  Trisha J Multhaupt-Buell; Anne Lovell; Lisa Mills; Kevin E Stanford; Robert J Hopkin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Parental attitudes regarding carrier testing in children at risk for fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; G A Spiridigliozzi; K Rounds; D V Dawson; J A Sullivan; D Burgess; A M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-01-29

7.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Victoria: 10 years' experience (1989-1998).

Authors:  R J Massie; M Olsen; J Glazner; C F Robertson; I Francis
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2000-06-19       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Parental attitudes toward genetic testing for pediatric deafness.

Authors:  J W Brunger; G S Murray; M O'Riordan; A L Matthews; R J Smith; N H Robin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Attitudes regarding predictive genetic testing in minors: a survey of European clinical geneticists.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Tom Goffin; Herman Nys; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

View more
  5 in total

1.  "They Just Want to Know" - Genetic Health Professionals' Beliefs About Why Parents Want to Know their Child's Carrier Status.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Clare Delany; John Massie; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A qualitative study to explore how professionals in the United Kingdom make decisions to test children for a sickle cell carrier status.

Authors:  Melissa Noke; Sarah Peters; Alison Wearden; Fiona Ulph
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Why Do Parents Want to Know their Child's Carrier Status? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Clare Delany; John Massie; Lynn Gillam
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Bridging the Gap between Scientific Advancement and Real-World Application: Pediatric Genetic Counseling for Common Syndromes and Single-Gene Disorders.

Authors:  Julie A McGlynn; Elinor Langfelder-Schwind
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.159

5.  Predictive Genetic Testing of Children for Adult-Onset Conditions: Negotiating Requests with Parents.

Authors:  Angela Fenwick; Mirjam Plantinga; Sandi Dheensa; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.537

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.