Literature DB >> 28161759

"They Just Want to Know" - Genetic Health Professionals' Beliefs About Why Parents Want to Know their Child's Carrier Status.

Danya F Vears1,2,3, Clare Delany4,5, John Massie6,4,7,8, Lynn Gillam9,4.   

Abstract

In the context of a child being diagnosed with a genetic condition, reports from both parents and health professionals suggest many genetic health professionals are reluctant to provide carrier testing for unaffected siblings, despite the lack of evidence of harm. We propose that genetic health professionals' understandings of why parents want to have their children tested may contribute to their reluctance to test. We draw on interviews with 17 genetic health professionals, reporting their beliefs about parents' motivations for testing and their intentions to communicate results to their children. Data were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Genetic health professionals reported attributions that contrasted with reasons parents actually report. These disparities fall into two categories: 1) attributing reasons that parents do not themselves report (i.e. for reassurance about their child's health), and 2) not recognizing the reasons that parents actually do report for wanting testing (i.e. to communicate the information to their child). By identifying that genetic health professionals may be misattributing reasons to parents for desiring their child"s carrier status, they may be missing an opportunity to assist parents to make decisions that are in line with their values and the best interests of the family.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carrier testing; Children, parenting; Communication; Disclosure; Gatekeeping; Genetic counseling; Genetic testing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28161759     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0070-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  30 in total

1.  Guidelines for genetic testing. The Japan Society of Human Genetics, Council Committee of Ethics.

Authors:  I Matsuda; N Niikawa; K Sato; K Suzumori; Y Fukushima; N Fujiki; I Kanazawa; Y Nakamura; S Yonemoto; Y Nakagome
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 2.  Inappropriate genetic testing of children.

Authors:  A Fryer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Content analysis: method, applications, and issues.

Authors:  B Downe-Wamboldt
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  1992 Jul-Sep

4.  Genetic counseling in adult carriers of a balanced chromosomal rearrangement ascertained in childhood: experiences from a nationwide reexamination of translocation carriers.

Authors:  Iben Bache; Karen Brondum-Nielsen; Niels Tommerup
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  The genetic testing of children. Working Party of the Clinical Genetics Society (UK)

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 6.  Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention.

Authors:  Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004

7.  Spinal muscular atrophy genetic counseling access and genetic knowledge: parents' perspectives.

Authors:  Candice Meldrum; Charles Scott; Kathryn J Swoboda
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Attitudes towards and beliefs about genetic testing in the haemophilia community: a qualitative study.

Authors:  S Thomas; D Herbert; A Street; C Barnes; J Boal; P Komesaroff
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.287

9.  "Family matters": a conceptual framework for genetic testing in children.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A Spiridigliozzi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Laine Friedman Ross; Howard M Saal; Karen L David; Rebecca R Anderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Danya F Vears; Joel T Minion; Stephanie J Roberts; James Cummings; Mavis Machirori; Mwenza Blell; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lorraine Cowley; Stephanie O M Dyke; Clara Gaff; Robert Green; Alison Hall; Amber L Johns; Bartha M Knoppers; Stephanie Mulrine; Christine Patch; Eva Winkler; Madeleine J Murtagh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Experiences of Women Who Have Had Carrier Testing for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Becker Muscular Dystrophy During Adolescence.

Authors:  Harry G Fraser; Rebecca Z Redmond; Diana F Scotcher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.537

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.