Literature DB >> 27438053

Trends in revision hip and knee arthroplasty observations after implementation of a regional joint replacement registry.

Jas Singh1, Angelos Politis1, Lynda Loucks1, David R Hedden1, Eric R Bohm1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National joint replacement registries outside North America have been effective in reducing revision risk. However, there is little information on the role of smaller regional registries similar to those found in Canada or the United States. We sought to understand trends in total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty revision patterns after implementation of a regional registry.
METHODS: We reviewed our regional joint replacement registry containing all 30 252 cases of primary and revision THA and TKA performed between Jan. 1, 2005, and Dec. 31, 2013. Each revision case was stratified into early (< 2 yr), mid (2-10 yr) or late (> 10 yr), and we determined the primary reason for revision.
RESULTS: The early revision rate for TKA dropped from 3.0% in 2005 to 1.3% in 2011 (R(2) = 0.84, p = 0.003). Similarly, the early revision rate for THA dropped from 4.2% to 2.1% (R(2) = 0.78, p = 0.008). Despite primary TKA and THA volumes increasing by 35.5% and 39.5%, respectively, there was no concomitant rise in revision volumes. The leading reasons for TKA revision were infection, instability, aseptic loosening and stiffness. The leading reasons for THA revision were infection, instability, aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fracture. There were no discernible trends over time in reasons for early, mid-term or late revision for either TKA or THA.
CONCLUSION: After implementation of a regional joint replacement registry we observed a significant reduction in early revision rates. Further work investigating the mechanism by which registry reporting reduces early revision risk is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27438053      PMCID: PMC5042716          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.002916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  4 in total

Review 1.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Noah Ivers; Gro Jamtvedt; Signe Flottorp; Jane M Young; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Simon D French; Mary Ann O'Brien; Marit Johansen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

2.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Fionna Mowat; Kevin Ong; Nathan Chan; Edmund Lau; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Joint replacement registries in the United States: a new paradigm.

Authors:  David C Ayers; Patricia D Franklin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Joint registry approach for identification of outlier prostheses.

Authors:  Richard N de Steiger; Lisa N Miller; David C Davidson; Philip Ryan; Stephen E Graves
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.717

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  The role of ligament tension and sensomotoric system in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Michael Tobias Hirschmann; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Hot spots and trends in knee revision research since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Kelei Zhai; Weifeng Ma; Tao Huang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03

3.  In-hospital complications following total knee and hip arthroplasty in patients with human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  Mustafa Akkaya; Zoltan Buday; Serhat Akcaalan; Philip Linke; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-03-28

4.  Higher risk of revision for infection using systemic clindamycin prophylaxis than with cloxacillin.

Authors:  Otto Robertsson; Olof Thompson; Annette W-Dahl; Martin Sundberg; Lars Lidgren; Anna Stefánsdóttir
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  A Case Report of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty After 17 Years: All Grown Up, What Happens When Implants Mature?

Authors:  Colin K Cantrell; Harshadkumar A Patel; Wesley R Stroud; Nicholas Dahlgren; Eva Lehtonen; Morad Qarmali; Kelly C Stéfani; Ashish Shah; Sameer M Naranje
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-06-13

6.  Patient-reported outcome after hip dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty is virtually unknown: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Lars L Hermansen; Martin H Haubro; Bjarke L Viberg; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Risk Factors for the Development of Nerve Palsy Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kawano; Motoki Sonohata; Masaru Kitajima; Masaaki Mawatari
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-04-23

8.  Massive Eccentric Wear of the Acetabular Cup after Polyethylene Liner Abrasion in Hip Arthroplasty may lead to a high Risk of Injury during Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Burger; Andrej M Nowakowski
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2021-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.