Literature DB >> 25231678

Prior fracture as a risk factor for future fracture in an Australian cohort.

K L Holloway1, S L Brennan, M A Kotowicz, G Bucki-Smith, E N Timney, A G Dobbins, L J Williams, J A Pasco.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: This study investigated the influence of prior fracture on the risk of subsequent fracture. There was a higher risk of subsequent fracture in both young and older adult age groups when Australian males or females had already sustained a prior fracture. Fracture prevention is important throughout life for both sexes.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of prior fracture on the risk of subsequent fracture across the adult age range in Australian males and females.
METHODS: All-cause fractures were grouped into age categories for males and females enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study (Australia) using retrospective self-report data and prospective radiology-confirmed data. For all age categories, the relative risk (RR and 95% confidence interval (CI)) of subsequent fracture in a later age category was compared between those with prior fracture and those without.
RESULTS: For both sexes, childhood fracture increased the risk of subsequent fracture in adolescence (males: RR 21.7; 95% CI 16.0, 27.4; females: RR 8.1; 3.5, 12.8). Males with adolescent fracture had increased risk of subsequent fracture in early adulthood (RR 11.5; 5.7, 17.3) and mid-adulthood (RR 13.0; 6.3, 19.7). Additionally, males with young adulthood or mid-adulthood fracture had increased risk of subsequent fracture in the following age group (RR 11.2; 4.4, 17.9, and RR 6.2; 0.8, 11.7, respectively). Mid-adult fractures increased the risk of subsequent fracture in older adulthood (RR 6.2; 0.8, 11.7). Females with childhood or adolescent fracture had an increased risk of fracture in young adulthood (RR 4.3; 0.7, 7.9, and RR 10.5; 4.4, 16.6), and prior fracture in older adult life increased the risk of subsequent fracture in old age (RR 14.9; 6.4. 23.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Fracture prevention strategies may be more effective if attention is directed towards individuals with prior fracture at any age as they have a higher likelihood of sustaining a subsequent fracture later in life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25231678     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2897-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  33 in total

1.  Obesity is not protective against fracture in postmenopausal women: GLOW.

Authors:  Juliet E Compston; Nelson B Watts; Roland Chapurlat; Cyrus Cooper; Steven Boonen; Susan Greenspan; Johannes Pfeilschifter; Stuart Silverman; Adolfo Díez-Pérez; Robert Lindsay; Kenneth G Saag; J Coen Netelenbos; Stephen Gehlbach; Frederick H Hooven; Julie Flahive; Jonathan D Adachi; Maurizio Rossini; Andrea Z Lacroix; Christian Roux; Philip N Sambrook; Ethel S Siris
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  The accuracy of self-report of fractures in elderly women: evidence from a prospective study.

Authors:  M C Nevitt; S R Cummings; W S Browner; D G Seeley; J A Cauley; T M Vogt; D M Black
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Clinical risk factors for fracture among postmenopausal patients at risk for fracture: a historical cohort study using electronic medical record data.

Authors:  Joanne LaFleur; Carrie McAdam-Marx; Stephen S Alder; Xiaoming Sheng; Carl V Asche; Jonathan Nebeker; Diana I Brixner; Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Fractures between the ages of 20 and 50 years increase women's risk of subsequent fractures.

Authors:  Fiona Wu; Barbara Mason; Anne Horne; Ruth Ames; Judith Clearwater; Michael Liu; Margaret C Evans; Gregory D Gamble; Ian R Reid
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-01-14

5.  First fracture is associated with increased risk of new fractures during growth.

Authors:  Ailsa Goulding; Ianthe E Jones; Sheila M Williams; Andrea M Grant; Rachael W Taylor; Patrick J Manning; John Langley
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Identification of incident fractures: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  J A Pasco; M J Henry; T M Gaudry; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Aust N Z J Med       Date:  1999-04

7.  Association of hip strength estimates by finite-element analysis with fractures in women and men.

Authors:  Shreyasee Amin; David L Kopperdhal; L Joseph Melton; Sara J Achenbach; Terry M Therneau; B Lawrence Riggs; Tony M Keaveny; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Phalangeal bone mineral density predicts incident fractures: a prospective cohort study on men and women--results from the Danish Health Examination Survey 2007–2008 (DANHES 2007–2008).

Authors:  Teresa Friis-Holmberg; Kim Brixen; Katrine Hass Rubin; Morten Grønbæk; Mickael Bech
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Reduced bone mineral density in postmenopausal women self-reporting premenopausal wrist fractures.

Authors:  C Fiorano-Charlier; A Ostertag; J P Aquino; M-C de Vernejoul; C Baudoin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Repeat low-trauma fractures occur frequently among men and women who have osteopenic BMD.

Authors:  Lisa Langsetmo; David Goltzman; Christopher S Kovacs; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; Nancy Kreiger; Robert Josse; Alexandra Papaioannou; Wojciech P Olszynski; Sophie A Jamal
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The National Osteoporosis Foundation's position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations.

Authors:  C M Weaver; C M Gordon; K F Janz; H J Kalkwarf; J M Lappe; R Lewis; M O'Karma; T C Wallace; B S Zemel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The social gradient of fractures at any skeletal site in men and women: data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study Fracture Grid.

Authors:  S L Brennan; K L Holloway; L J Williams; M A Kotowicz; G Bucki-Smith; D J Moloney; A G Dobbins; E N Timney; J A Pasco
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Is repeated childhood fracture related to areal bone density or body composition in middle age?

Authors:  Meredith-Jones Kim; Haszard Jillian; Taylor Rachael; Waters Debra; Hogan Sean; Ramrakha Sandhya; Poulton Richie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 5.071

4.  Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density T-Score and Nonvertebral Fracture Risk Over 10 Years of Denosumab Treatment.

Authors:  S Ferrari; C Libanati; Celia Jow Fang Lin; J P Brown; F Cosman; E Czerwiński; L H de Gregόrio; J Malouf-Sierra; J-Y Reginster; A Wang; R B Wagman; E M Lewiecki
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Why Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians fall and fracture: the codesigned Study of Indigenous Muscle and Bone Ageing (SIMBA) protocol.

Authors:  Ayse Zengin; Cat Shore-Lorenti; Marc Sim; Louise Maple-Brown; Sharon Lee Brennan-Olsen; Joshua R Lewis; Jennifer Ockwell; Troy Walker; David Scott; Peter Ebeling
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Comparison of fracture rates between indigenous and non-indigenous populations: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Sharon L Brennan-Olsen; Shae E Quirk; William D Leslie; Maree Toombs; Kara L Holloway; Sarah M Hosking; Julie A Pasco; Brianna J Doolan; Richard S Page; Lana J Williams
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.