Literature DB >> 25227436

The profound effects of patient arm positioning on organ doses from CT procedures calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and deformable phantoms.

Haikuan Liu1, Yiming Gao2, Aiping Ding2, Peter F Caracappa2, X George Xu2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the organ dose differences caused by the arms-raised and arms-lowered postures for multidetector computed tomography procedures. Organ doses were calculated using computational phantoms and Monte Carlo simulations. The arm position in two previously developed adult male and female human phantoms was adjusted to represent 'raised' and 'lowered' postures using advanced BREP-based mesh surface geometries. Organ doses from routine computed tomography (CT) scan protocols, including the chest, abdomen-pelvis, and chest-abdomen-pelvis scans, were simulated at various tube voltages and reported in the unit of mGy per 100 mAs. The CT scanner model was based on previously tested work. The differences in organ dose per unit tube current between raised and lowered arm postures were studied. Furthermore, the differences due to the tube current modulation (TCM) for these two different postures and their impact on organ doses were also investigated. For a given scan parameter, a patient having lowered arms received smaller doses to organs located within the chest, abdomen or pelvis when compared with the patient having raised arms. As expected, this is caused by the attenuation of the primary X rays by the arms. However, the skin doses and bone surface doses in the patient having lowered arms were found to be 3.97-32.12% larger than those in a patient having raised arms due to the fact that more skin and spongiosa were covered in the scan range when the arms are lowered. This study also found that dose differences become smaller with the increase in tube voltage for most of organs or tissues except the skin. For example, the liver dose differences decreased from -15.01 to -11.33% whereas the skin dose differences increased from 21.53 to 25.24% with tube voltage increased from 80 to 140 kVp. With TCM applied, the organ doses of all the listed organs in patient having lowered arms are larger due to the additional tube current necessary to overcome the presence of the arms while maintaining sufficient image quality Arm position affects the dose to internal organs from CT scans by as much as 25.3%. The presence of arms in the scan range results in a dose increase for the skin and bone surface, but a dose decrease for organs located in the torso. Considering the use of TCM, which is common in many clinics, the patient having lowered arms may receive 50% higher radiation dose to most of the organs because of the increased tube current. The use of higher tube voltage might narrow such dose differences between patients of these two postures due to the greater penetration of higher-energy X rays. Therefore, when calculating or reporting patient doses from CT scans, it is prudent to select an appropriate phantom that accurately represents the patient posture.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25227436      PMCID: PMC4405194          DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  18 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine.

Authors:  E Stephen Amis; Priscilla F Butler; Kimberly E Applegate; Steven B Birnbaum; Libby F Brateman; James M Hevezi; Fred A Mettler; Richard L Morin; Michael J Pentecost; Geoffrey G Smith; Keith J Strauss; Robert K Zeman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results.

Authors:  Fred A Mettler; Bruce R Thomadsen; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Debbie B Gilley; Joel E Gray; Jill A Lipoti; John McCrohan; Terry T Yoshizumi; Mahadevappa Mahesh
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Comparison of two types of adult phantoms in terms of organ doses from diagnostic CT procedures.

Authors:  Haikuan Liu; Jianwei Gu; Peter F Caracappa; X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Extension of RPI-adult male and female computational phantoms to obese patients and a Monte Carlo study of the effect on CT imaging dose.

Authors:  Aiping Ding; Matthew M Mille; Tianyu Liu; Peter F Caracappa; X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The development, validation and application of a multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner model for assessing organ doses to the pregnant patient and the fetus using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  J Gu; B Bednarz; P F Caracappa; X G Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  E J Hall; D J Brenner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

9.  RPI-AM and RPI-AF, a pair of mesh-based, size-adjustable adult male and female computational phantoms using ICRP-89 parameters and their calculations for organ doses from monoenergetic photon beams.

Authors:  Juying Zhang; Yong Hum Na; Peter F Caracappa; X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Arm raising at exposure-controlled multidetector trauma CT of thoracoabdominal region: higher image quality, lower radiation dose.

Authors:  Monique Brink; Frank de Lange; Luuk J Oostveen; Helena M Dekker; Digna R Kool; Jaap Deunk; Michael J R Edwards; Cornelis van Kuijk; Richard L Kamman; Johan G Blickman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Do we need 3D tube current modulation information for accurate organ dosimetry in chest CT? Protocols dose comparisons.

Authors:  Xochitl Lopez-Rendon; Guozhi Zhang; Walter Coudyzer; Wim Develter; Hilde Bosmans; Federica Zanca
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparative dosimetry of radiography device, MSCT device and two CBCT devices in the elbow region.

Authors:  Juha Koivisto; Maureen van Eijnatten; John Ludlow; Timo Kiljunen; Xie-Qi Shi; Jan Wolff
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Heart-centered positioning and tailored beam-shaping filtration for reduced radiation dose in coronary artery calcium imaging: A Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Study.

Authors:  Brendan Colvert; Marzia Rigolli; Amanda Craine; Michael Criqui; Francisco Contijoch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.506

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.