| Literature DB >> 25227282 |
Eric E Morgan, Andrew B Casabianca, Samer J Khouri, Andrea L Nestor Kalinoski1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rodent models are increasingly used to study the development and progression of arterial stiffness. Both the non-invasive Doppler derived Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) and the invasively determined arterial elastance index (EaI) have been used to assess arterial stiffness in rats and mice, but the need for anesthetic agents to make these in vivo estimates may limit their utility. Thus, we sought to determine: 1) if known differences in arterial stiffness in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) are detectable by PWV and EaI measurements when made under isoflurane anesthesia, and 2) if these two uniquely acquired assessments of arterial elasticity correlate.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25227282 PMCID: PMC4245200 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-12-37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Figure 1Calculation of PWV. Time (T) between the R wave of the EKG and the foot of the A) carotid and B) iliac pulse waves were determined and averaged over 3 consecutive beats. C) PWV was calculated as Distance (D)/ Time (T), where D = the distance from the carotid to the iliac applantation sites and T = the time (R to iliac foot) - (R to carotid foot).
PWV parameters assessed by Doppler ultrasound
| Age | n | Heart rate (bpm) | Distance (D) (mm) | R to Carotid foot (msec) | R to Iliac foot (msec) | Time (T) (msec) | PWV (m/sec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHR (young) | 10 | 439 ± 34 | 134.0 ± 9.7 | 24.3 ± 2.9 | 41.1 ± 2.3 | 16.8 ± 1.3 | 8.0 ± 0.8 |
| SHR (old) | 10 | 432 ± 32 | 156.0 ± 10.7 | 23.8 ± 3.9 | 35.9 ± 3.8 | 12.1 ± 2.3 | 13.2 ± 2 |
| N.S. |
| N.S. |
|
|
| ||
D = distance from the carotid to the iliac notch.
R = R wave of the EKG.
T = (R to Iliac foot) – (R to Carotid foot).
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 2Bland Altman plot for the percentage of the mean difference and 95% limits for A) Inter- (mean: -1.20%, 95% limits of agreement: 3.40% to -5.80%) and B) Intra- (mean: -0.40%, 95% limits of agreement: 3.43% to -4.23%) observer measurements of R-carotid foot (solid circles) and R- iliac foot (open circles) time measurements.
Figure 3Representative pressure-volume loops recorded with the Millar pressure-volume catheter system in a young and old rat. Effective arterial elastance, Ea = (Pes/SV) for each pressure-volume loop series. Pes = end systolic pressure and SV = stroke volume.
Comparison of Doppler flow measured PWV and calculated EaI by pressure-volume loop analysis
| Doppler ultrasound | Pressure-volume loops | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | n | Weight (g) | Heart rate (bpm) | PWV (m/sec) | Heart rate (bpm) | EaI (mmHg/μl/g) |
| SHR (young) | 10/8 | 289 ± 9 | 439 ± 34 | 8.0 ± 0.8 | 346 ± 29* | 97 ± 16 |
| SHR (old) | 10/7 | 388 ± 26 | 432 ± 32 | 13.2 ± 2 | 328 ± 38* | 120 ± 20 |
|
| NS |
| NS |
| ||
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
*P <0.0001 vs. heart rate measured by ultrasound.
Figure 4Pearson correlation analysis of PWV and EaI.