| Literature DB >> 31960611 |
Praveen Kumar1,2, Jude S Morton2,3,4, Amin Shah2,3,4, Victor Do1,2, Consolato Sergi4,5, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin2,3, Sandra T Davidge2,3,4, Donna Beker4, Jody Levasseur4, Lisa K Hornberger1,2,3,4.
Abstract
AIM: We sought to explore whether fetal hypoxia exposure, an insult of placental insufficiency, is associated with left ventricular dysfunction and increased aortic stiffness at early postnatal ages.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular programming; development; diastolic dysfunction; echocardiography; intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR); myocardial function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31960611 PMCID: PMC6971413 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
General and LV Systolic function parameters from day 1 to week 8 after birth
| Parameter | Day 1 | Day 3 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Overall time effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (g) | |||||||
| Control | 9.2 ± 0.4 | 10.9 ± 0.3 | 17.8 ± 0.8 | 37.4 ± 0.7 | 108.6 ± 2.5 | 321.6 ± 18.9 | |
| Hypoxia | 7.6 ± 0.4 | 10.0 ± 0.3 | 16.2 ± 0.8 | 33.1 ± 0.7 | 104.0 ± 2.5 | 311.9 ± 18.9 |
|
| LV EDD/wt (mm/kg) | |||||||
| Control | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.00 | 0.12 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.024 ± 0.001 | |
| Hypoxia | 0.333 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.00 | 0.06 ± 00 | 0.024 ± 0.001 |
|
| LV PWd/wt (mm/kg) | |||||||
| Control | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.005 ± 0.000 | |
| Hypoxia | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.07 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.005 ± 0.000 |
|
| Heart rate (bpm) | |||||||
| Control | 304 ± 6 | 349 ± 8 | 362 ± 12 | 382 ± 7 | 435 ± 9 | 403 ± 8 | |
| Hypoxia | 260 ± 9 | 342 ± 4 | 352 ± 5 | 400 ± 9 | 410 ± 13 | 406 ± 7 |
|
| Stroke volume/wt (µl/kg) | |||||||
| Control | 2.61 ± 0.13 | 2.46 ± 0.11 | 2.17 ± 0.10 | 1.76 ± 0.09 | 1.22 ± 0.07 | 0.83 ± 0.04 | |
| Hypoxia | 2.78 ± 0.14 | 2.78 ± 0.14 | 2.12 ± 0.12 | 1.69 ± 0.10 | 1.28 ± 0.08 | 0.82 ± 0.05 |
|
| VCFc (circ/s) | |||||||
| Control | 2.12 ± 0.1 | 2.47 ± 0.1 | 2.57 ± 0.07 | 2.36 ± 0.1 | 3.00 ± 0.18 | 3.58 ± 0.2 | |
| Hypoxia | 1.84 ± 0.14 | 2.62 ± 0.15 | 2.80 ± 0.19 | 3.05 ± 0.15 | 2.76 ± 0.17 | 3.34 ± 0.14 |
|
| Septal S’ vel (mm/s) | |||||||
| Control | 14.5 ± 1.0 | 17.8 ± 0.8 | 20.3 ± 0.8 | 18.9 ± 0.8 | 36.6 ± 1.7 | 52.3 ± 1.8 | |
| Hypoxia | 14.1 ± 0.6 | 17.4 ± 0.6 | 19.4 ± 0.8 | 23.6 ± 0.7 | 36.9 ± 1.7 | 55.9 ± 3.1 |
|
| LV LW S’ vel (mm/s) | |||||||
| Control | 15.3 ± 0.5 | 18.5 ± 0.5 | 20.8 ± 0.5 | 18.9 ± 0.7 | 32.6 ± 1.3 | 47.6 ± 1.7 | |
| Hypoxia | 15.1 ± 0.8 | 18.6 ± 0.4 | 20.2 ± 0.7 | 23.5 ± 0.6 | 37.8 ± 2.3 | 56.7 ± 2.6 |
|
| AOd‐PWV (m/s) | |||||||
| Control | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | |
| Hypoxia | 12.2 ± 0.3.1 | 9.6 ± 1.4 | 8.6 ± 2.5 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 5.4 ± 0.3 |
|
LV‐left ventricular, PWd‐posterior wall thickness in diastole, IVSd‐interventricular septal wall thickness in diastole, LW‐left ventricular lateral wall, VCFc‐rate‐corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening, vel‐velocity. All data are presented as mean ± SE. Highlighted variables represent those with differences between prenatal hypoxia‐exposed and control pups at specific ages.
No statistical difference when the effect of litter was incorporated into the analysis.
p ≤ .008 for differences between hypoxia exposed and control pups at a given age.
Changes in LV diastolic function and aortic stiffness assessed by mitral valve pulse flow and tissue Doppler
| Parameter | Day 1 | Day 3 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 4 | Week 8 | Overall time effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MV E vel ( mm/s) | |||||||
| Control | 336 ± 15 | 449 ± 21 | 542 ± 19 | 658 ± 20 | 920 ± 39 | 1,035 ± 30 | |
| Hypoxia | 314 ± 22 | 524 ± 16 | 541 ± 24 | 703 ± 26 | 847 ± 38 | 868 ± 32 |
|
| MV A vel (mm/s) | |||||||
| Control | 436 ± 17 | 493 ± 30 | 475 ± 21 | 459 ± 17 | 575 ± 20 | 646 ± 30 | |
| Hypoxia | 408 ± 22 | 596 ± 20 | 545 ± 20 | 528 ± 25 | 619 ± 25 | 650 ± 35 |
|
| LV LW E’ vel (mm/s) | |||||||
| Control | 13.3 ± 1.6 | 13.6 ± 1.2 | 16.4 ± 0.6 | 20.3 ± 1.0 | 44.3 ± 2.4 | 52.9 ± 2.8 | |
| Hypoxia | 9.5 ± 0.7 | 12.3 ± 0.6 | 14.4 ± 0.5 | 26.0 ± 1.7 | 36.6 ± 2.9 | 52.6 ± 3.5 |
|
| LV LW A’ vel (mm/s) | |||||||
| Control | 18.8 ± 1.9 | 18.4 ± 1.4 | 19.9 ± 0.8 | 19.4 ± 1.3 | 39.2 ± 2.0 | 46.4 ± 2.5 | |
| Hypoxia | 16.7 ± 1.0 | 18.9 ± 0.7 | 21.2 ± 0.5 | 29.8 ± 0.8 | 43.4 ± 3.4 | 65.3 ± 5.0 |
|
| LV LW E’/A’ vel | |||||||
| Control | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.83 ± 0.03 | 1.08 ± 0.06 | 1.14 ± 0.04 | 1.16 ± 0.05 | |
| Hypoxia | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 0.65 ± 0.03 | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 0.89 ± 0.08 | 0.85 ± 0.02 | 0.82 ± 0.03 |
|
| AOd‐PWV (m/s) | |||||||
| Control | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | |
| Hypoxia | 12.2 ± 0.3.1 | 9.6 ± 1.4 | 8.6 ± 2.5 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 5.4 ± 0.3 |
|
AOd‐pulse wave velocity (PWV) at the diaphragm; MV‐mitral valve; LV LW‐left ventricle lateral wall, vel‐peak velocity. All data are presented as mean ± SE. Highlighted variables represent those with differences between prenatal hypoxia‐exposed and control pups at specific ages.
No statistical difference when the effect of litter was incorporated into the analysis.
p < .008 for differences between hypoxia exposed and control pups at a given age.
Figure 1Evolution of LV Ejection Fraction in Hypoxia versus Normoxia‐Exposed Pups. Transiently increased LV ejection fraction was observed in prenatal hypoxia‐exposed rat pups at weeks 1 and 2. All data are presented as mean ± SE (*p < .008)
Figure 2Evolution of LV Inflow and tissue Doppler velocities in Prenatal Hypoxia versus Normoxia Pups. (a) and (b) demonstrate representative mitral valve inflow (upper) and tissue velocity (lower) Doppler tracings acquired in the rat pups. Graphs (c) through (f) demonstrate the evolution of the mitral valve E/A wave ratio and septal diastolic velocities in hypoxia and normoxia‐exposed pups. (c) Although the LV inflow E/A wave increased in both intrauterine hypoxia and normoxia‐exposed pups with age, this increase was significantly less in the former due to less of an increase in early filling velocities and a greater reliance on filling with atrial systole. (e) Early diastolic septal E’ velocity increased in both hypoxia‐exposed and control pups with age, but was significantly lower in hypoxia‐exposed pups by week 4 and week 8. (e) Late diastolic septal (A’) velocities also increased in both hypoxia‐exposed and control pups from day 1 to week 8 with statistically higher velocities at week 2 and week 8 in the former. (f) Septal E’/A’ wave ratios increased in both groups, but, as a consequence of less change in E’ and higher A’ velocities, were progressively lower in hypoxia‐exposed pups from week 2 onward. All data are presented as mean ± SE (*p < .008)
Figure 3Evolution of LV Isovolumic Relaxation Time in Prenatal Hypoxia versus Normoxia Pups. Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) became progressively shorter in prenatal hypoxia‐exposed pups from week 1 compared to controls. (a) IVRT duration decreased in both hypoxia‐exposed and control pups from day 1 to week 8, but was significantly lower in hypoxia‐exposed pups from week 2 onward. (b) The IVRT duration relative to the R‐R interval remained constant in hypoxia‐exposed and control pups but was significantly lower in hypoxia‐exposed pups from week 1 onward. IVRT‐isovolumic relaxation time and R‐R‐cardiac cycle length (*p = .008)
Figure 4Evolution of Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity in Prenatal Hypoxia versus Normoxia Pups. (a) and (b) demonstrate the technique of measuring T1 and T2 for the aortic pulse wave velocity at the ascending aorta and aortic bifurcation, respectively, as a measure of aortic stiffness. Both time intervals are measured from the onset of the QRS to the onset of flow. The aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) was then calculated by the distance between the two points of measure divided by T2‐T1 in M/s. (c) The aortic PWV with T2 measured just above the aortic bifurcation was most increased at day 1 and day 3 in prenatal hypoxia‐exposed rat pups but was still increased at week 8 compared to controls (*<.008)
Figure 5Myocyte Nuclei Count, Size & Area of the Myocyte in Prenatal Hypoxia and Normoxia Pups. Comparison of a) nuclear count, b) nuclear size, and c) proportion of the nuclear area relative to the myocyte area at 2 and 4 weeks in hypoxia‐exposed and control rat pups. There was a significant decrease in nuclear count and size with age but no significant difference between hypoxia and normoxia‐exposed pups. Data were analyzed by 2‐way ANOVA: ** p < .01, ****p < .0001 group effect of offspring age
Figure 6Myocyte Nuclear Shape in Prenatal Hypoxia and Normoxia Pups. Comparison of myocyte nuclear shape between hypoxia‐exposed and control rat pups at weeks 2 and 4: a) Diagram demonstrating the nuclear dimensions assessed. b) Only differences in Feret Y dimension were observed between the groups with a reduced dimension in hypoxia‐exposed pups at week 2 (*p = .003 by t test)
Figure 7LV Myocardial Collagen in Prenatal Hypoxia and Normoxia Pups. Comparison of collagen fiber deposition between hypoxia‐exposed and control rat pups at week 2 and week 4: Collagen fiber (a) count, (b) perimeter, and (c) thickness at week 2 and week 4 in hypoxia‐exposed and control rat pups are demonstrated. Although both groups demonstrated a decrease in fiber number with age, there was a significant increase in fiber perimeter and thickness by week 4 in rat pups exposed to hypoxia before birth compared to normoxic controls which showed no significant difference in fiber size between week 2 and week 4. Data were analyzed by 2‐way ANOVA: *p < .05 group effect of prenatal environment, offspring age or interaction of the factors. Tukey's post hoc test: †p < .05 versus all other groups