Literature DB >> 18426997

Central pressure: variability and impact of cardiovascular risk factors: the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial II.

Carmel M McEniery1, Barry McDonnell, Margaret Munnery, Sharon M Wallace, Chloe V Rowe, John R Cockcroft, Ian B Wilkinson.   

Abstract

Pulse pressure varies throughout the arterial tree, resulting in a gradient between central and peripheral pressure. Factors such as age, heart rate, and height influence this gradient. However, the relative impact of cardiovascular risk factors and atheromatous disease on central pressure and the normal variation in central pressure in healthy individuals are unclear. Seated peripheral (brachial) and central (aortic) blood pressures were assessed, and the ratio between aortic and brachial pulse pressure (pulse pressure ratio, ie, 1/amplification) was calculated in healthy individuals, diabetic subjects, patients with cardiovascular disease, and in individuals with only 1 of the following: hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or smoking. The age range was 18 to 101 years, and data from 10 613 individuals were analyzed. Compared with healthy individuals, pulse pressure ratio was significantly increased (ie, central systolic pressure was relatively higher) in individuals with risk factors or disease (P<0.01 for all of the comparisons). Although aging was associated with an increased pulse pressure ratio, there was still an average+/-SD difference between brachial and aortic systolic pressure of 11+/-4 and 8+/-3 mm Hg for men and women aged >80 years, respectively. Finally, stratifying individuals by brachial pressure revealed considerable overlap in aortic pressure, such that >70% of individuals with high-normal brachial pressure had similar aortic pressures as those with stage 1 hypertension. These data demonstrate that cardiovascular risk factors affect the pulse pressure ratio, and that central pressure cannot be reliably inferred from peripheral pressure. However, assessment of central pressure may improve the identification and management of patients with elevated cardiovascular risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18426997     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.105445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  106 in total

1.  Living donor kidney donation: another form of white coat effect.

Authors:  Stephanie S DeLoach; Kevin E C Meyers; Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 2.  Noninvasive studies of central aortic pressure.

Authors:  Michael F O'Rourke; Audrey Adji
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of the comparative effects of different classes of antihypertensive agents on brachial and central systolic blood pressure, and augmentation index.

Authors:  Charlotte H Manisty; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Noninvasive measurement of central vascular pressures with arterial tonometry: clinical revival of the pulse pressure waveform?

Authors:  Matthew R Nelson; Jan Stepanek; Michael Cevette; Michael Covalciuc; R Todd Hurst; A Jamil Tajik
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Different effects of tocolytic medication on blood pressure and blood pressure amplification.

Authors:  Isabelle Fabry; Peter De Paepe; Jan Kips; Sebastian Vermeersch; Luc Van Bortel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Validity of predicting left ventricular end systolic pressure changes following an acute bout of exercise.

Authors:  Rebecca M Kappus; Sushant M Ranadive; Huimin Yan; Abbi D Lane; Marc D Cook; Grenita Hall; I Shevon Harvey; Kenneth R Wilund; Jeffrey A Woods; Bo Fernhall
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.319

7.  Older age is associated with greater central aortic blood pressure following the exercise stress test in subjects with similar brachial systolic blood pressure.

Authors:  Masatake Kobayashi; Kazutaka Oshima; Yoichi Iwasaki; Yuto Kumai; Alberto Avolio; Akira Yamashina; Kenji Takazawa
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Antihypertensive drugs and central blood pressure.

Authors:  Carmel M McEniery
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Aortic pulse pressure is associated with carotid IMT in chronic kidney disease: report from Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort.

Authors:  Stephanie S DeLoach; Lawrence J Appel; Jing Chen; Marshall M Joffe; Crystal A Gadegbeku; Emile R Mohler; Afshin Parsa; Kalyani Perumal; Mohammed A Rafey; Susan P Steigerwalt; Valerie Teal; Raymond R Townsend; Sylvia E Rosas
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 10.  Determinants of Vascular Age: An Epidemiological Perspective.

Authors:  Anna M Kucharska-Newton; Lee Stoner; Michelle L Meyer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 8.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.