Ann Marie Dale1, Daniel Ryan2, Laura Welch3, Margaret A Olsen4, Bryan Buchholz5, Bradley Evanoff1. 1. Division of General Medical Sciences Department, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. 2. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 3. The Center for Construction Research and Training CPWR, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. 4. Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. 5. Work Environment Department, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Compare rates of medical insurance claims for musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) between workers in a construction trade and a general worker population to determine if higher physical exposures in construction lead to higher rates of claims on personal medical insurance. METHODS: Health insurance claims between 2006 and 2010 from floor layers were frequency matched by age, gender, eligibility time and geographic location to claims from insured workers in general industry obtained from MarketScan. We extracted MSD claims and dates of service from six regions of the body: neck, low back, knee, lower extremity, shoulder and distal arm, and evaluated differences in claim rates. RESULTS: Fifty-one per cent of floor layers (n=1475) experienced musculoskeletal claims compared with 39% of MarketScan members (p<0.001). Claim rates were higher for floor layers across all body regions with nearly double the rate ratios for the knee and neck regions (RR 2.10 and 2.07). The excess risk was greatest for the neck and low back regions; younger workers had disproportionately higher rates in the knee, neck, low back and distal arm. A larger proportion of floor layers (22%) filed MSD claims in more than one body region compared with general workers (10%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Floor layers have markedly higher rates of MSD claims compared with a general worker population, suggesting a shifting of medical costs for work-related MSD to personal health insurance. The occurrence of disorders in multiple body regions and among the youngest workers highlights the need for improved work methods and tools for construction workers. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVES: Compare rates of medical insurance claims for musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) between workers in a construction trade and a general worker population to determine if higher physical exposures in construction lead to higher rates of claims on personal medical insurance. METHODS: Health insurance claims between 2006 and 2010 from floor layers were frequency matched by age, gender, eligibility time and geographic location to claims from insured workers in general industry obtained from MarketScan. We extracted MSD claims and dates of service from six regions of the body: neck, low back, knee, lower extremity, shoulder and distal arm, and evaluated differences in claim rates. RESULTS: Fifty-one per cent of floor layers (n=1475) experienced musculoskeletal claims compared with 39% of MarketScan members (p<0.001). Claim rates were higher for floor layers across all body regions with nearly double the rate ratios for the knee and neck regions (RR 2.10 and 2.07). The excess risk was greatest for the neck and low back regions; younger workers had disproportionately higher rates in the knee, neck, low back and distal arm. A larger proportion of floor layers (22%) filed MSD claims in more than one body region compared with general workers (10%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Floor layers have markedly higher rates of MSD claims compared with a general worker population, suggesting a shifting of medical costs for work-related MSD to personal health insurance. The occurrence of disorders in multiple body regions and among the youngest workers highlights the need for improved work methods and tools for construction workers. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Ann Marie Dale; Lisa Jaegers; Laura Welch; Ellen Barnidge; Nancy Weaver; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Bradley Evanoff; Bethany T Gardner; Jaime R Strickland; Skye Buckner-Petty; Alfred Franzblau; Ann Marie Dale Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Mary F Barbe; Vicky S Massicotte; Soroush Assari; M Alexandra Monroy; Nagat Frara; Michele Y Harris; Mamta Amin; Tamara King; Geneva E Cruz; Steve N Popoff Journal: Bone Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Alysha R Meyers; Ibraheem S Al-Tarawneh; Steven J Wurzelbacher; P Timothy Bushnell; Michael P Lampl; Jennifer L Bell; Stephen J Bertke; David C Robins; Chih-Yu Tseng; Chia Wei; Jill A Raudabaugh; Teresa M Schnorr Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Mary F Barbe; Mamta Amin; Michele Y Harris; Siva Tejaa Panibatla; Soroush Assari; Steven N Popoff; Geoffrey M Bove Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 6.208