Literature DB >> 9973879

Under-reporting of work-related disorders in the workplace: a case study and review of the literature.

G Pransky1, T Snyder, A Dembe, J Himmelstein.   

Abstract

Accurate reporting of work-related conditions is necessary to monitor workplace health and safety, and to identify the interventions that are most needed. Reporting systems may be designed primarily for external agencies (OSHA or workers' compensation) or for the employer's own use. Under-reporting of workplace injuries and illnesses is common due to a variety of causes and influences. Based on previous reports, the authors were especially interested in the role of safety incentive programmes on under-reporting. Safety incentive programmes typically reward supervisors and employees for reducing workplace injury rates, and thus may unintentionally inhibit proper reporting. The authors describe a case study of several industrial facilities in order to illustrate the extent of under-reporting and the reasons for its occurrence. A questionnaire and interview survey was administered to 110 workers performing similar tasks and several managers, health, and safety personnel at each of three industrial facilities. Although less than 5% of workers had officially reported a work-related injury or illness during the past year, over 85% experienced work-related symptoms, 50% had persistent work-related problems, and 30% reported either lost time from work or work restrictions because of their ailment. Workers described several reasons for not reporting their injuries, including fear of reprisal, a belief that pain was an ordinary consequence of work activity or ageing, lack of management responsiveness after prior reports, and a desire not to lose their usual job. Interviews with management representatives revealed administrative and other barriers to reporting, stemming from their desire to attain a goal of no reported injuries, and misconceptions about requirements for recordability. The corporate and facility safety incentives appeared to have an indirect, but significant negative influence on the proper reporting of workplace injuries by workers. A variety of influences may contribute to under-reporting; because of under-reporting, worker surveys and symptom reports may provide more valuable and timely information on risks than recordable injury logs. Safety incentive programmes should be carefully designed to ensure that they provide a stimulus for safety-related changes, and to discourage under-reporting. A case-control study of similar establishments, or data before and after instituting safety incentives, would be required to more clearly establish the role of these programmes in under-reporting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9973879     DOI: 10.1080/001401399185874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  42 in total

Review 1.  Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: design as a prevention strategy. A review.

Authors:  T Amell; S Kumar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-12

2.  Occupational health of Southeast Asian immigrants in a US city: a comparison of data sources.

Authors:  Lenore S Azaroff; Charles Levenstein; David H Wegman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Occupational injury and illness surveillance: conceptual filters explain underreporting.

Authors:  Lenore S Azaroff; Charles Levenstein; David H Wegman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Declining trends in work-related morbidity and disability, 1993-1998: a comparison of survey estimates and compensation insurance claims.

Authors:  Cam Mustard; Donald Cole; Harry Shannon; Jason Pole; Terry Sullivan; Richard Allingham
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  An impact evaluation of a federal mine safety training regulation on injury rates among US stone, sand, and gravel mine workers: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Authors:  Celeste Monforton; Richard Windsor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Psychosocial factors related to lower back problems in a South African manganese industry.

Authors:  Bernard van Vuuren; Evert Zinzen; Hendrik Johannes van Heerden; Piet Becker; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

7.  Community campaigns, supply chains, and protecting the health and well-being of workers.

Authors:  Michael Quinlan; Rosemary K Sokas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Underreporting of Workplace Violence: Comparison of Self-Report and Actual Documentation of Hospital Incidents.

Authors:  Judith E Arnetz; Lydia Hamblin; Joel Ager; Mark Luborsky; Mark J Upfal; Jim Russell; Lynnette Essenmacher
Journal:  Workplace Health Saf       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.413

9.  Self-reported reduced productivity due to musculoskeletal symptoms: associations with workplace and individual factors among white-collar computer users.

Authors:  Mats Hagberg; Ewa Wigaeus Tornqvist; Allan Toomingas
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-09

10.  Information and feedback to improve occupational physicians' reporting of occupational diseases: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Annet F Lenderink; Dick Spreeuwers; Jac J L van der Klink; Frank J H van Dijk
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.