B A Evanoff1,2, D S Rohlman2,3, J R Strickland1,2, A M Dale1,2. 1. Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 2. Healthier Workforce Center of the Midwest, Iowa City, Iowa. 3. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Construction is among the most dangerous industries. In addition to traditional hazards for workplace injury and illness, other threats to health and well-being may occur from work organization and work environment factors, including irregular employment, long commutes, long work hours, and employer policies regarding health and safety. These nontraditional hazards may affect work and health outcomes directly, or through effects on health behaviors. The cumulative impacts of both traditional and nontraditional hazards on health-related outcomes among construction workers are largely unknown. METHODS: We conducted a survey among apprentice construction workers to identify relationships between work organization and environmental factors with five outcomes of economic relevance to employers: missed work due to work-related injury, missed work due to any pain or injury, self-reported workability, health-related productivity, and use of prescription medications for pain. RESULTS: A total of 963 surveys were completed (response rate 90%) in this young (mean age 28) working cohort. Multivariate Poisson regression models found associations between the outcomes of interest and multiple work factors, including job strain, safety behaviors of coworkers, and mandatory overtime. Univariate analysis showed additional associations, including precarious work, and supervisor support for safety. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this cross-sectional study suggest that work organization and environment factors influence health and work outcomes among young construction trade workers. Future work with longitudinal data will examine the hypothesized paths between work factors, health behaviors, health outcomes, and work outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Construction is among the most dangerous industries. In addition to traditional hazards for workplace injury and illness, other threats to health and well-being may occur from work organization and work environment factors, including irregular employment, long commutes, long work hours, and employer policies regarding health and safety. These nontraditional hazards may affect work and health outcomes directly, or through effects on health behaviors. The cumulative impacts of both traditional and nontraditional hazards on health-related outcomes among construction workers are largely unknown. METHODS: We conducted a survey among apprentice construction workers to identify relationships between work organization and environmental factors with five outcomes of economic relevance to employers: missed work due to work-related injury, missed work due to any pain or injury, self-reported workability, health-related productivity, and use of prescription medications for pain. RESULTS: A total of 963 surveys were completed (response rate 90%) in this young (mean age 28) working cohort. Multivariate Poisson regression models found associations between the outcomes of interest and multiple work factors, including job strain, safety behaviors of coworkers, and mandatory overtime. Univariate analysis showed additional associations, including precarious work, and supervisor support for safety. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this cross-sectional study suggest that work organization and environment factors influence health and work outcomes among young construction trade workers. Future work with longitudinal data will examine the hypothesized paths between work factors, health behaviors, health outcomes, and work outcomes.
Keywords:
Total Worker Health; construction workers; health-related productivity; safety climate; work environment; work organization; workplace safety
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Elizabeth M Barbeau; Anne M Stoddard; Mary Kay Hunt; Roberta Goldman; Ann Smith; Angela A Brennan; Lorraine Wallace Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Iris F Groeneveld; Karin I Proper; Allard J van der Beek; Vincent H Hildebrandt; Willem van Mechelen Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: David Cal Ham; Thomas Przybeck; Jaime R Strickland; Douglas A Luke; Laura J Bierut; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Emily H Sparer; Cassandra A Okechukwu; Justin Manjourides; Robert F Herrick; Jeffrey N Katz; Jack T Dennerlein Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Amy E Harley; Carol M Devine; Binta Beard; Anne M Stoddard; Mary K Hunt; Glorian Sorensen Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Ann Marie Dale; Bethany T Gardner; Angelique Zeringue; Jaime Strickland; Alexis Descatha; Alfred Franzblau; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Jack T Dennerlein; Daniel Weinstein; Whitney Huynh; Jamie Tessler; Lauren Bigger; Lauren Murphy; Justin Manjourides Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Mohammed Al-Bouwarthan; Margaret M Quinn; David Kriebel; David H Wegman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jian Li; Timothy A Matthews; Liwei Chen; Marissa Seamans; Constanze Leineweber; Johannes Siegrist Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 3.390