Literature DB >> 25222329

Human health risk implications of multiple sources of faecal indicator bacteria in a recreational waterbody.

Jeffrey A Soller1, Mary E Schoen2, Arun Varghese3, Audrey M Ichida3, Alexandria B Boehm4, Sorina Eftim3, Nicholas J Ashbolt5, John E Ravenscroft6.   

Abstract

We simulate the influence of multiple sources of enterococci (ENT) as faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in recreational water bodies on potential human health risk by considering waters impacted by human and animal sources, human and non-pathogenic sources, and animal and non-pathogenic sources. We illustrate that risks vary with the proportion of culturable ENT in water bodies derived from these sources and estimate corresponding ENT densities that yield the same level of health protection that the recreational water quality criteria in the United States seeks (benchmark risk). The benchmark risk is based on epidemiological studies conducted in water bodies predominantly impacted by human faecal sources. The key result is that the risks from mixed sources are driven predominantly by the proportion of the contamination source with the greatest ability to cause human infection (potency), not necessarily the greatest source(s) of FIB. Predicted risks from exposures to mixtures comprised of approximately 30% ENT from human sources were up to 50% lower than the risks expected from purely human sources when contamination is recent and ENT levels are at the current water quality criteria levels (35 CFU 100 mL(-1)). For human/non-pathogenic, human/gull, human/pig, and human/chicken faecal mixtures with relatively low human contribution, the predicted culturable enterococci densities that correspond to the benchmark risk are substantially greater than the current water quality criteria values. These findings are important because they highlight the potential applicability of site specific water quality criteria for waters that are predominantly un-impacted by human sources.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Faecal contamination; Microbial source apportionment; Quantitative microbial risk assessment; Recreational water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25222329     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  15 in total

1.  Occurrence of Host-Associated Fecal Markers on Child Hands, Household Soil, and Drinking Water in Rural Bangladeshi Households.

Authors:  Alexandria B Boehm; Dan Wang; Ayse Ercumen; Meghan Shea; Angela R Harris; Orin C Shanks; Catherine Kelty; Alvee Ahmed; Zahid Hayat Mahmud; Benjamin F Arnold; Claire Chase; Craig Kullmann; John M Colford; Stephen P Luby; Amy J Pickering
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2016-11-08

2.  Quantitative CrAssphage PCR Assays for Human Fecal Pollution Measurement.

Authors:  Elyse Stachler; Catherine Kelty; Mano Sivaganesan; Xiang Li; Kyle Bibby; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Patterns of Host-Associated Fecal Indicators Driven by Hydrology, Precipitation, and Land Use Attributes in Great Lakes Watersheds.

Authors:  Deborah K Dila; Steven R Corsi; Peter L Lenaker; Austin K Baldwin; Melinda J Bootsma; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment and Infectious Disease Transmission Modeling of Waterborne Enteric Pathogens.

Authors:  Andrew F Brouwer; Nina B Masters; Joseph N S Eisenberg
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2018-06

Review 5.  Bacteriophages as indicators of faecal pollution and enteric virus removal.

Authors:  B R McMinn; N J Ashbolt; A Korajkic
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.858

6.  Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches.

Authors:  Danielle D Cloutier; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.

Authors:  Derek Rothenheber; Stephen Jones
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Variable fecal source prioritization in recreational waters routinely monitored with viral and bacterial general indicators.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Catherine A Kelty; Mano Sivaganesan; Orin C Shanks
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Microbial source tracking (MST) in Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area: Seasonal and precipitation trends in MST marker concentrations, and associations with E. coli levels, pathogenic marker presence, and land use.

Authors:  By Anna McKee; Marirosa Molina; Mike Cyterski; Ann Couch
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  Applying EFDC Explorer model in the Gallinas River, Mexico to estimate its assimilation capacity for water quality protection.

Authors:  Clemente Rodríguez-Cuevas; Franklin Torres-Bejarano; Rodolfo Cisneros-Pérez; Rodolfo Cisneros-Almazán; Claudia Villota-López; Carlos Couder-Castañeda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.