Literature DB >> 30006393

Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.

Derek Rothenheber1, Stephen Jones2,3.   

Abstract

Fecal pollution at coastal beaches requires management efforts to address public health and economic concerns. Feces-borne bacterial concentrations are influenced by different fecal sources, environmental conditions, and ecosystem reservoirs, making their public health significance convoluted. In this study, we sought to delineate the influences of these factors on enterococcal concentrations in southern Maine coastal recreational waters. Weekly water samples and water quality measurements were conducted at freshwater, estuarine, and marine beach sites from June through September 2016. The samples were analyzed for total and particle-associated enterococcal concentrations, total suspended solids, and microbial source tracking markers (PCR: Bac32, HF183, CF128, DF475, and Gull2; quantitative PCR [qPCR]: AllBac, HF183, and GFD). Water, soil, sediment, and marine sediment samples were also subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing and SourceTracker analysis to determine the influence from these environmental reservoirs on water sample microbial communities. Enterococcal and particle-associated enterococcal concentrations were elevated in freshwater, but the concentrations of suspended solids were relatively similar. Mammal fecal contamination was significantly elevated in the estuary, with human and bird fecal contaminant levels similar between sites. A partial least-squares regression model indicated particle-associated enterococcal and mammal marker concentrations had the most significant positive relationships with enterococcal concentrations across marine, estuary, and freshwater environments. Freshwater microbial communities were significantly influenced by underlying sediment, while estuarine/marine beach communities were influenced by freshwater, high tide height, and estuarine sediment. Elevated enterococcal levels were reflective of a combination of increased fecal source input, environmental sources, and environmental conditions, highlighting the need for encompassing microbial source tracking (MST) approaches for managing water quality issues.IMPORTANCE Enterococci have long been the federal standard in determining water quality at estuarine and marine environments. Although enterococci are highly abundant in the intestines of many animals, they are not exclusive to that environment and can persist and grow outside fecal tracts. This presents a management problem for areas that are largely impaired by nonpoint source contamination, as fecal sources might not be the root cause of contamination. This study employed different microbial source tracking methods for delineating the influences from fecal source input, environmental sources, and environmental conditions to determine which combination of variables are influencing enterococcal concentrations in recreational waters at a historically impaired coastal town. The results showed that fecal source input, environmental sources, and conditions all play roles in influencing enterococcal concentrations. This highlights the need to include an encompassing microbial source tracking approach to assess the effects of all important variables on enterococcal concentrations.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coastal ecosystem; enterococci; fecal pollution; microbial source tracking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30006393      PMCID: PMC6102982          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01038-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  56 in total

1.  Soil: the environmental source of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Guam's streams.

Authors:  R Fujioka; C Sian-Denton; M Borja; J Castro; K Morphew
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Microplate subtractive hybridization to enrich for bacteroidales genetic markers for fecal source identification.

Authors:  Linda K Dick; Michael T Simonich; Katharine G Field
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Transport of selected bacterial pathogens in agricultural soil and quartz sand.

Authors:  Tim Schinner; Adrian Letzner; Stefan Liedtke; Felipe D Castro; Irwin A Eydelnant; Nathalie Tufenkji
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Influence of Land Use, Nutrients, and Geography on Microbial Communities and Fecal Indicator Abundance at Lake Michigan Beaches.

Authors:  Danielle D Cloutier; Elizabeth W Alm; Sandra L McLellan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Persistence and differential survival of fecal indicator bacteria in subtropical waters and sediments.

Authors:  Kimberly L Anderson; John E Whitlock; Valerie J Harwood
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  The occurrence and sources of Campylobacter spp., Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the Salmon River, British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Cassandra C Jokinen; Hans Schreier; William Mauro; Eduardo Taboada; Judith L Isaac-Renton; Edward Topp; Thomas Edge; James E Thomas; Victor P J Gannon
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 1.744

8.  Influence of soil on fecal indicator organisms in a tidally influenced subtropical environment.

Authors:  Timothy R Desmarais; Helena M Solo-Gabriele; Carol J Palmer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Enumeration and speciation of enterococci found in marine and intertidal sediments and coastal water in southern California.

Authors:  D M Ferguson; D F Moore; M A Getrich; M H Zhowandai
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.772

10.  Phylogenetic diversity and molecular detection of bacteria in gull feces.

Authors:  Jingrang Lu; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Regina Lamendella; Thomas Edge; Stephen Hill
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.