Literature DB >> 26726268

Expense for Clinical Documentation of Inpatients: Extent and Hierarchal Differences for the Example of a Gynaecological Department in Switzerland.

M Thanner1, G Drack1, R Hornung1.   

Abstract

Introduction: The majority of physicians consider administrative tasks to be a burden. The present questionnaire is intended to clarify the expense of time for documentation tasks in the treatment of inpatients in a gynaecological department of a Swiss hospital and to what extent differences occur between senior physicians and junior physicians. Materials and
Methods: For three weeks physicians in the gynaecological department of a central Swiss hospital documented minute for minute predefined tasks during their duty periods. A questionnaire in tabular form served as survey instrument for this working time analysis. The minute for minute details for the individual participants were summed for each clinical task listed in the questionnaire in order to subsequently calculate the amounts of time spent for the respective task categories and to subject them to a subgroup analysis.
Results: The participation rate of the physicians amounted to 87 %. 287 questionnaires were included in the evaluation. According to the responses, 25 % of the clinical working time for inpatients was used for documentation of clinical tasks. The subgroup analysis revealed a higher proportion for assistant physicians (30 %) than for senior physicians (18 %). Discussion: The present working time analysis reveals an unfavourable ratio between surgical and administrative tasks between junior and senior physicians. In addition there is a danger that the true burden for junior physicians is underestimated by their superiors due to hierarchal differences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  administration; documentation; hospital; time study

Year:  2015        PMID: 26726268      PMCID: PMC4686365          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1558273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  15 in total

1.  [The decision after medical school: surgery--yes or no?].

Authors:  A Biedenkopf
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 0.628

2.  A comparison of self-reported and observational work sampling techniques for measuring time in nursing tasks.

Authors:  Amanda Ampt; Johanna Westbrook; Nerida Creswick; Nadine Mallock
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2007-01

3.  Working conditions and trainee shortage in operative disciplines--is our profession ready for the next decade?

Authors:  Herwig Cerwenka; Heinz Bacher; Georg Werkgartner; Hans-Jörg Mischinger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  A comparison of work-sampling and time-and-motion techniques for studies in health services research.

Authors:  S A Finkler; J R Knickman; G Hendrickson; M Lipkin; W G Thompson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Career and Family - Are They Compatible?: Results of a Survey of Male and Female Gynaecologists in Germany.

Authors:  K Hancke; B Toth; W Igl; B Ramsauer; A Bühren; A Wöckel; K Jundt; N Ditsch; A Gingelmaier; K Rhiem; K Vetter; K Friese; R Kreienberg
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  A comparison of time-and-motion and self-reporting methods of work measurement.

Authors:  T A Burke; J R McKee; H C Wilson; R M Donahue; A S Batenhorst; D S Pathak
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.737

Review 7.  Systematic review of time studies evaluating physicians in the hospital setting.

Authors:  Matthew D Tipping; Victoria E Forth; David B Magill; Kate Englert; Mark V Williams
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.960

8.  Can a senior house officer's time be used more effectively?

Authors:  J Mitchell; C Hayhurst; S M Robinson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Four minutes for a patient, twenty seconds for a relative - an observational study at a university hospital.

Authors:  Gerhild Becker; Dorothee E Kempf; Carola J Xander; Felix Momm; Manfred Olschewski; Hubert E Blum
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Time and Resources Needed to Document Patients with Breast Cancer from Primary Diagnosis to Follow-up - Results of a Single-center Study.

Authors:  M P Lux; C S Sell; P A Fasching; J Seidl-Ertel; M R Bani; M G Schrauder; S M Jud; C R Loehberg; C Rauh; A Hartmann; R Schulz-Wendtland; V Strnad; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.