Literature DB >> 25217113

Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity.

Jeffrey L Foster1, Zach Shipstead, Tyler L Harrison, Kenny L Hicks, Thomas S Redick, Randall W Engle.   

Abstract

Measures of working memory capacity (WMC), such as complex span tasks (e.g., operation span), have become some of the most frequently used tasks in cognitive psychology. However, due to the length of time it takes to complete these tasks many researchers trying to draw conclusions about WMC forgo properly administering multiple tasks. But can the complex span tasks be shortened to take less administration time? We address this question by splitting the tasks into three blocks of trials, and analyzing each block's contribution to measuring WMC and predicting fluid intelligence (Gf). We found that all three blocks of trials contributed similarly to the tasks' ability to measure WMC and Gf, and the tasks can therefore be substantially shortened without changing what they measure. In addition, we found that cutting the number of trials by 67 % in a battery of these tasks still accounted for 90 % of the variance in their measurement of Gf. We discuss our findings in light of administering the complex span tasks in a method that can maximize their accuracy in measuring WMC, while minimizing the time taken to administer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25217113     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0461-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; David Z Hambrick; Stephen W Tuholski; Oliver Wilhelm; Tabitha W Payne; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-06

2.  Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005).

Authors:  Michael J Kane; David Z Hambrick; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs?

Authors:  Phillip L Ackerman; Margaret E Beier; Mary O Boyle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Longitudinal evidence that increases in processing speed and working memory enhance children's reasoning.

Authors:  Robert V Kail
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-04

Review 5.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

Review 6.  CNTRICS final task selection: working memory.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Marc G Berman; Randy Engle; Jessica Hurdelbrink Jones; John Jonides; Angus Macdonald; Derek Evan Nee; Thomas S Redick; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Working memory training may increase working memory capacity but not fluid intelligence.

Authors:  Tyler L Harrison; Zach Shipstead; Kenny L Hicks; David Z Hambrick; Thomas S Redick; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-10-03

8.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of component processes in human working memory.

Authors:  A Gevins; B Cutillo
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-09

9.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.

Authors:  S J Luck; E K Vogel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?

Authors:  Oliver Wilhelm; Andrea Hildebrandt; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-24
View more
  32 in total

1.  Individual differences in relational reasoning.

Authors:  Maureen E Gray; Keith J Holyoak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

2.  The feasibility and acceptability of assessing inhibitory control and working memory among adolescents via an ecological momentary assessment approach.

Authors:  Christopher M Warren; Mary Ann Pentz
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Changes in Working Memory Performance Over an Academic Semester in Student Pharmacists.

Authors:  Arwa Omary; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Nisha Raghunath; Lisa R Fournier; Clark Kogan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-20

5.  Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.

Authors:  Yu-Hui Lo; Philip Tseng
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The reliability and stability of visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Z Xu; K C S Adam; X Fang; E K Vogel
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-04

7.  Dopaminergic modulation of the exploration/exploitation trade-off in human decision-making.

Authors:  Karima Chakroun; David Mathar; Antonius Wiehler; Florian Ganzer; Jan Peters
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Brain potentials predict learning, transmission and modification of an artificial symbolic system.

Authors:  Massimo Lumaca; Giosuè Baggio
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Cognitive and neural predictors of speech comprehension in noisy backgrounds in older adults.

Authors:  Megan C Fitzhugh; Sydney Y Schaefer; Leslie C Baxter; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Resuming a Dynamic Task Following Increasingly Long Interruptions: The Role of Working Memory and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Katherine Labonté; François Vachon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.