| Literature DB >> 25216040 |
Roh-Eul Yoo1, Seung Hong Choi2, Hye Rim Cho3, Bong-Sik Jeon4, Eunbyul Kwon4, Eung-Gyu Kim4, Juyoung Park4, Wan-Jae Myeong4, Jae-Kyung Won5, Yun-Sang Lee6, Ji-Hoon Kim1, Sun-Won Park7, Chul-Ho Sohn1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of lymph node metastasis is crucial in treatment planning for cancer patients. Despite the use of various parameters, making correct diagnosis of a small metastatic or a hyperplastic benign node is still a challenge. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of detecting lymph node metastasis using a new ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particle, PJY10, in a rabbit model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25216040 PMCID: PMC4162649 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107583
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Number of all removed lymph nodes identified on histopathologic specimens.
| PJY10 dosage (mg Fe/kg) | |||
| 5.2 | 7.8 | 10. 4 | |
| Number of rabbits | 15 | 17 | 24 |
| Number of benign nodes | 45 | 51 | 53 |
| Number of metastatic nodes | 20 | 17 | 18 |
Sensitivity and specificity at each PJY10 dosage.
| PJY10 dosage (mg Fe/kg) | |||
| 5.2 | 7.8 | 10.4 | |
| Sensitivity (%) [95% CI] | 100 (20 of 20) [74, 100] | 100 (17 of 17) [77, 100] | 100 (18 of 18) [74, 100] |
| Specificity (%) [95% CI] | 62 (28 of 45) [45, 79] | 71 (36 of 51) [58, 83] | 89 (47 of 53) [78, 99] |
Data clustering (ie, more than one lesion per rabbit) was accounted for with the method of Rao and Scott [22]. Data in parentheses are the raw data used to calculate the percentages, and data in square brackets are 95% confidence intervals (CI) expressed as percentages.
Quantitative analysis: signal intensity difference between the benign and metastatic lymph nodes at different PJY10 dosages.
| PJY10 dosage (mg Fe/kg) | |||
| 5.2 | 7.8 | 10.4 | |
| Number of voxels[low]
| |||
| Benign nodes | 0.916 (n = 45) | 0.931 (n = 51) | 0.989 (n = 53) |
| Metastatic nodes | 0.869 (n = 20) | 0.823 (n = 17) | 0.831 (n = 18) |
|
| .240 | .077 | <.001 |
| Mean SI ratio | |||
| Benign nodes | 0.619 (n = 45) | 0.560 (n = 51) | 0.407 (n = 53) |
| Metastatic nodes | 0.716 (n = 20) | 0.777 (n = 17) | 0.749 (n = 18) |
|
| .070 | <.001 | <.001 |
Data in parentheses are the number of lymph nodes.
*The number of voxels[low] represents the fraction of the number of voxels with the normalized SI on the postcontrast image lower than that on the precontrast image.
The mean signal intensity (SI) ratio between pre- and postcontrast images is calculated using the following formula: SI ratio = (SI lymph node[post-USPIO]/SI muscle[post-USPIO])/(SI lymph node[pre-USPIO]/SI muscle[pre-USPIO]).
Quantitative analysis: Az values with regard to diagnosing lymph node metastasis at different PJY10 dosages.
| PJY10 dosage (mg Fe/kg) | |||
| 5.2 | 7.8 | 10.4 | |
| Number of voxels[low] [95% CI] | 0.647 [0.518, 0.761] | 0.779 [0.661, 0.870] | 0.905 [0.812, 0.962] |
| Mean SI ratio [95% CI] | 0.627 [0.498, 0.744] | 0.785 [0.669, 0.876] | 0.952 [0.873, 0.988] |
Data in square brackets are 95% confidence intervals (CI) expressed as percentages.
*The number of voxels[low] represents the fraction of the number of voxels with the normalized SI on the postcontrast image lower than that on the precontrast image.
The mean signal intensity (SI) ratio between pre- and postcontrast images is calculated using the following formula: SI ratio = (SI lymph node[post-USPIO]/SI muscle[post-USPIO])/(SI lymph node[pre-USPIO]/SI muscle[pre-USPIO]).
Figure 1Linear regression plots between histopathologic area ratio (Arearatio) and quantitative image analysis parameters.
The best-fit lines (ie, the graphs of the linear regression equations) are shown as solid lines for linear regression analyses between the Arearatio and either the number of voxels[low] (A) or the mean signal intensity (SI) ratio (B) at PJY10 dosage of 10.4 mg Fe/kg. The curves above and below the best-fit line represent the upper and lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval (CI). r = correlation coefficient.
Figure 2A tumor model into which 10.4 mg Fe/kg of PJY10 was administered.
(A, B) An ovoid right common iliac lymph node with a short-axis diameter of 0.3 cm shows a focal signal drop at its superior aspect (arrow) on the postcontrast coronal T2*-weighted MR image (B), as compared with the precontrast image (A). (C) The hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) stained pathology specimen at high-power field (magnification×400) well-demonstrates a metastatic focus (arrowheads) at the inferior aspect of the lymph node, corresponding to the portion with no signal drop on the postcontrast MR image (B). (D, E) Another enlarged lymph node (arrow) at the iliac bifurcation remains unchanged on the postcontrast coronal T2*-weighted MR image (E), as compared with the precontrast image (D). (Some susceptibility artifact due to adjacent bowel gas is present on the precontrast image.) (F) Multiple metastatic foci (arrowheads) were confirmed on the hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) stained pathology specimen (magnification×400).
Figure 3An inflammation model into which 10.4 mg Fe/kg of PJY10 was administered.
(A, B) The pre- (A) and postcontrast (B) coronal T2*-weighted MR images demonstrate a central darkening of an enlarged lymph node (arrow) in the right common iliac area. (C) An electron microscopy image of the lymph node confirmed the presence of contrast particles (arrowheads) within the cytoplasmic organelle of the lymph node macrophage (magnification×20,000).