Literature DB >> 12202868

The impact of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron-emission tomography on the surgical staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

Hubert Vesselle1, Jeffrey M Pugsley, Eric Vallières, Douglas E Wood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Staging data on patients with non-small cell lung cancer were prospectively collected to evaluate the accuracy and anatomic information provided by fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron-emission tomography and its impact on improving the accuracy of surgical staging.
METHODS: A total of 142 patients with potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer were imaged with positron-emission tomography (neck to pelvis). Positron-emission tomographic scans were read prospectively with thoracic computed tomographic comparison. Patients without distant metastases at positron-emission tomography underwent staging with bronchoscopy and mediastinoscopy, with or without mediastinotomy or thoracoscopy. Patients with metastases, pleural implants, or N2 or N3 disease did not undergo primary resection.
RESULTS: Positron-emission tomography revealed unsuspected distant metastases in 24 of 142 patients (16.9%) and unsuspected pleural implants in 6 others. Nodal stage was surgically established in 118 cases. Positron-emission tomography showed that 5 patients had nodal disease not accessible by mediastinoscopy. In 35 (24.6%) of these 142 cases, positron-emission tomography directed the evaluation away from routine bronchoscopy and mediastinoscopy staging that would have resulted in inappropriate treatment selection. Positron-emission tomography correctly differentiated resectable stages IA through IIIA (N1) from stages IIIA (N2) through IV in 88.7% of cases. In identifying N2 or N3 disease, positron-emission tomography had an accuracy of 90.7%, a sensitivity of 80.9%, a specificity of 96%, and positive and negative predictive values of 91.9% and 90.1%, respectively. Of the 8 cases in which positron-emission tomography missed N2 disease, 7 had the disease discovered by mediastinoscopy and 1 had it discovered at thoracotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy of positron-emission tomography-enhanced clinical staging is high. Positron-emission tomography has previously been used primarily to screen for lymph node spread and distant metastases, but it also provides localizing information that allows directed and more sensitive surgical staging and refinement of patient selection for curative resection. Positron-emission tomography and surgical staging play complementary roles in the journey toward more accurate overall staging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12202868     DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2002.123130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  12 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging can correctly identify false-positive lymph nodes on positron emission tomography in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nomori; Yue Cong; Hiroshi Sugimura; Yoshiaki Kato
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Neural networks for nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET and CT: importance of combining uptake values and sizes of nodes and primary tumor.

Authors:  Lauren K Toney; Hubert J Vesselle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  A contrast-oriented algorithm for FDG-PET-based delineation of tumour volumes for the radiotherapy of lung cancer: derivation from phantom measurements and validation in patient data.

Authors:  Andrea Schaefer; Stephanie Kremp; Dirk Hellwig; Christian Rübe; Carl-Martin Kirsch; Ursula Nestle
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS study.

Authors:  Paul Verboom; Harm van Tinteren; Otto S Hoekstra; Egbert F Smit; Jan H A M van den Bergh; Ad J M Schreurs; Roland A L M Stallaert; Piet C M van Velthoven; Emile F I Comans; Fred W Diepenhorst; Johan C van Mourik; Pieter E Postmus; Maarten Boers; Els W M Grijseels; Gerrit J J Teule; Carin A Uyl-de Groot
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography in lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nomori; Yasuomi Ohba; Kentaro Yoshimoto; Hidekatsu Shibata; Kenji Shiraishi; Takeshi Mori
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04-15

6.  Impact of FDG-PET findings on decisions regarding patient management strategies: a multicenter trial in patients with lung cancer and other types of cancer.

Authors:  Kazuo Kubota; Shinsuke Matsuno; Nobuo Morioka; Shuji Adachi; Mitsuru Koizumi; Hikaru Seto; Motohisa Kojo; Satoshi Nishioka; Michihiko Nishimura; Hiroshi Yamamoto
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 7.  Positron emission tomography scanning for the diagnosis and management of lung cancer.

Authors:  Bruce R Line; Charles S White
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2004-02

Review 8.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) radiotracers in oncology--utility of 18F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG)-PET in the management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Evelina Miele; Gian Paolo Spinelli; Federica Tomao; Angelo Zullo; Filippo De Marinis; Giulia Pasciuti; Luigi Rossi; Federica Zoratto; Silverio Tomao
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-17

9.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography ratio in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Hyun-Cheol Kang; Hong-Gyun Wu; Tosol Yu; Hak Jae Kim; Jin Chul Paeng
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2013-09-30

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes in a rabbit model: efficacy of PJY10, a new ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide agent, with monodisperse iron oxide core and multiple-interaction ligands.

Authors:  Roh-Eul Yoo; Seung Hong Choi; Hye Rim Cho; Bong-Sik Jeon; Eunbyul Kwon; Eung-Gyu Kim; Juyoung Park; Wan-Jae Myeong; Jae-Kyung Won; Yun-Sang Lee; Ji-Hoon Kim; Sun-Won Park; Chul-Ho Sohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.