Literature DB >> 16357394

Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MR lymphangiography: does contrast-enhanced imaging alone suffice for accurate lymph node characterization?

Mukesh G Harisinghani1, Mansi A Saksena, Peter F Hahn, Benjamin King, John Kim, Maha T Torabi, Ralph Weissleder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ferumoxtran-10 is a lymphotropic MR contrast agent that is currently under investigation. It has been shown to be effective in staging lymph nodes of patients with various primary malignancies. The current technique with ferumoxtran-10 involves imaging before and 24 hr after contrast administration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ferumoxtran-10-enhanced images alone in characterizing lymph nodes for oncologic staging 24 hr after contrast enhancement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-seven patients (58 men, 19 women) with proven primary cancer (bladder [n = 20], breast [n = 10], endometrial [n = 1], renal [n = 3], penile [n = 4], prostate [n = 31], rectal [n = 1], testicular [n = 5], and ureteral [n = 2]) who were scheduled for surgical lymph node dissection were enrolled in the study. In these patients, 169 lymph nodes (mean size, 11.2 mm) were evaluated on T2*-weighted gradient-refocused echo MRI at l.5 T both before and 24-36 hr after the IV administration of ferumoxtran-10 (2.6 mg Fe/kg). Two blinded reviewers with differing levels of interpreting experience separately performed qualitative image evaluation. A 6-point scale was used to characterize lymph nodes on contrast-enhanced images alone and on combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed separately for both reviewers.
RESULTS: Of the 169 lymph nodes evaluated, 55 were benign and 114 malignant by histopathologic analysis. The results of the ROC analysis comparing contrast-enhanced images ([A(z) = area under ROC curve] reviewer 1, A(z) = 0.92; reviewer 2, A(z) = 0.94) alone with combined unenhanced and contrast-enhanced images (reviewer 1, A(z) = 0.94; reviewer 2, A(z) = 0.93) showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.01) for reviewer 1 but no difference for reviewer 2 (p = 0.88). Reviewer 2 was more experienced in interpreting ferumoxtran-10-enhanced images than reviewer 1.
CONCLUSION: On ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MR lymphangiography, contrast-enhanced images alone may suffice for lymph node characterization. However, a certain level of interpretation experience may be required before contrast-enhanced images can be used alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16357394     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  27 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary imaging modalities for the surveillance of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew K Tollefson; Naoki Takahashi; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging.

Authors:  K Kinkel; R Forstner; F M Danza; L Oleaga; T M Cunha; A Bergman; J O Barentsz; C Balleyguier; B Brkljacic; J A Spencer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO): diagnostic performance in post-contrast images using new diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Takaya Tokuhara; Nobuhiko Tanigawa; Mitsuru Matsuki; Eiji Nomura; Hideaki Mabuchi; Sang-Woong Lee; Yoshiaki Tatsumi; Haruto Nishimura; Ryoji Yoshinaka; Yoshitaka Kurisu; Isamu Narabayashi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MRI for the staging of genitourinary tumors.

Authors:  Samdeep K Mouli; Lee C Zhao; Reed A Omary; C Shad Thaxton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Lipid-calcium phosphate nanoparticles for delivery to the lymphatic system and SPECT/CT imaging of lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Tseng; Zhenghong Xu; Kevin Guley; Hong Yuan; Leaf Huang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  A comprehensive literatures update of clinical researches of superparamagnetic resonance iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Jean-Marc Idée
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 7.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: value and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Ansje S Fortuin; Robert Jan Smeenk; Hanneke J M Meijer; Alfred J Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Carina Mari Aparici; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance lymphography in gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  Noor Jahan; Priya Narayanan; Andrea Rockall
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Imaging techniques for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.