Literature DB >> 8563585

Magnitude of benefit from earlier thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: new evidence from Grampian region early anistreplase trial (GREAT)

J Rawles1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To generalise from the results of the Grampian region early anistreplase trial (GREAT) and to express the benefit of earlier thrombolysis in terms of lives saved per hour of earlier treatment.
DESIGN: Multivariate analysis of a randomised double blind trial.
SETTING: 29 rural practices in Grampian region and teaching hospitals in Aberdeen.
SUBJECTS: 311 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and without contraindications to thrombolysis who were seen by their general practitioners within four hours of the start of symptoms.
INTERVENTIONS: Anisterplase 30 units given intravenously, either by general practitioners before hospitalisation or later in hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Death within 30 months of entry into trial.
RESULTS: Death within 30 months was positively related to age (P < 0.0001) and to delay between start of symptoms and thrombolytic treatment (P = 0.0004). However, the probability of dying rose exponentially with earlier presentation, so death within 30 months was negatively related to the logarithm of the time of randomisation (P = 0.0163). In patients presenting two hours after start of symptoms each hour's delay in receiving thrombolysis led to the loss of 21 lives per 1000 within 30 days (95% confidence interval 1 to 94 lives per 1000) (P = 0.03) and 69 lives per 1000 within 30 months (16 to 141 lives per 1000) (P = 0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of the benefit from earlier thrombolysis is such that giving thrombolytic treatment to patients with acute myocardial infarction should be accorded the same degree of urgency as the treatment of cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8563585      PMCID: PMC2350007          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7025.212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  Initial pain course and delay to hospital admission in relation to myocardial infarct size.

Authors:  K Hofgren; E Bondestam; F G Johansson; S Jern; J Herlitz; S Holmberg
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.210

2.  Treatment of myocardial infarction and angina. Review underestimated the benefit of early thrombolysis.

Authors:  J Rawles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-18

3.  Early versus late hospital arrival for acute myocardial infarction in the western Washington thrombolytic therapy trials.

Authors:  C Maynard; R Althouse; M Olsufka; J L Ritchie; K B Davis; J W Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Guidelines for the early management of patients with myocardial infarction. British Heart Foundation Working Group.

Authors:  C F Weston; W J Penny; D G Julian
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-03-19

5.  Impact of resuscitation and thrombolysis on mortality rate from acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Trent; J Adams; K Jennings; J Rawles
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1995-03-24       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Association of patient delay with symptoms, cardiac enzymes, and outcome in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J M Rawles; M J Metcalfe; C Shirreffs; K Jennings; A C Kenmure
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Patient and general practitioner delays in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J M Rawles; N E Haites
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-26
  7 in total
  21 in total

1.  Using clinical indicators in emergency medicine: documenting performance improvements to justify increased resource allocation.

Authors:  I R Rogers; L Evans; G A Jelinek; I Jacobs; C Inkpen; D Mountain
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-09

2.  What's the point of ST elevation?

Authors:  S D Carley; R Gamon; P A Driscoll; G Brown; P Wallman
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Prehospital thrombolysis: lessons from Sweden and their application to the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J R Benger; R Karlsten; B Eriksson
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Cost implications of prehospital emergency drug administration. The case of prehospital thrombolytics.

Authors:  S Barton; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Paramedics and pre-hospital management of acute myocardial infarction: diagnosis and reperfusion.

Authors:  S Johnston; R Brightwell; M Ziman
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Guidelines to reducing delays in administration of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  W L Williams
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Prehospital emergency care.

Authors:  M Cooke; T Hodgetts; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-16

8.  Primary PTCA in the UK: if not for all, then for whom?

Authors:  N Brooks
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  ISIS-2: 10 year survival among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in randomised comparison of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither. The ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.

Authors:  C Baigent; R Collins; P Appleby; S Parish; P Sleight; R Peto
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-02

Review 10.  Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael McCaul; Andrit Lourens; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.