OBJECTIVES: Emergency medical services (EMS) use by stroke patients varies from 38% to 65%. In an epidemiological study, we determined the proportion of stroke patients who used EMS, hypothesizing that demographics, stroke severity, stroke type, and location at stroke onset would be associated with EMS use. METHODS: Stroke and transient ischemic attack patients were identified in a population of 1.3 million in the Cincinnati area in 1999. Patient charts and EMS records were abstracted by research nurses and reviewed by study physicians. The proportion of EMS users was computed. Logistic regression was used to test for associations with EMS use. RESULTS: Of 3949 strokes, we excluded strokes/transient ischemic attacks that occurred in the hospital (n = 283), out of town (n = 10), during EMS transport (n = 2), and at unknown locations (n = 73). Patients with unknown EMS use (n = 301); those with missing estimated stroke severity (n = 174), prestroke disability (n = 78), race (n = 3), and stroke type (n = 3); and those younger than 18 years (n = 14) were also excluded. The remaining 3008 patients had a mean age of 74 years, 17% were black, and 45% were men. Emergency medical services was used by 1532 (50.9%) patients. Age, prestroke disability, stroke severity, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke at work were associated with EMS use. Race, sex, and prior stroke were not associated with EMS use. CONCLUSION: Half of stroke patients used EMS in our population-based study. Older patients; those with greater prestroke disability, more severe stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke; and those having stroke at work were more likely to use EMS.
OBJECTIVES: Emergency medical services (EMS) use by strokepatients varies from 38% to 65%. In an epidemiological study, we determined the proportion of strokepatients who used EMS, hypothesizing that demographics, stroke severity, stroke type, and location at stroke onset would be associated with EMS use. METHODS:Stroke and transient ischemic attack patients were identified in a population of 1.3 million in the Cincinnati area in 1999. Patient charts and EMS records were abstracted by research nurses and reviewed by study physicians. The proportion of EMS users was computed. Logistic regression was used to test for associations with EMS use. RESULTS: Of 3949 strokes, we excluded strokes/transient ischemic attacks that occurred in the hospital (n = 283), out of town (n = 10), during EMS transport (n = 2), and at unknown locations (n = 73). Patients with unknown EMS use (n = 301); those with missing estimated stroke severity (n = 174), prestroke disability (n = 78), race (n = 3), and stroke type (n = 3); and those younger than 18 years (n = 14) were also excluded. The remaining 3008 patients had a mean age of 74 years, 17% were black, and 45% were men. Emergency medical services was used by 1532 (50.9%) patients. Age, prestroke disability, stroke severity, hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke at work were associated with EMS use. Race, sex, and prior stroke were not associated with EMS use. CONCLUSION: Half of strokepatients used EMS in our population-based study. Older patients; those with greater prestroke disability, more severe stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke; and those having stroke at work were more likely to use EMS.
Authors: A M Pancioli; J Broderick; R Kothari; T Brott; A Tuchfarber; R Miller; J Khoury; E Jauch Journal: JAMA Date: 1998 Apr 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J Broderick; T Brott; R Kothari; R Miller; J Khoury; A Pancioli; J Gebel; D Mills; L Minneci; R Shukla Journal: Stroke Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Karin Rossnagel; Gerhard Jan Jungehülsing; Christian H Nolte; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Stephanie Roll; Karl Wegscheider; Arno Villringer; Stefan N Willich Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Dawn Kleindorfer; Brett Kissela; Alex Schneider; Daniel Woo; Jane Khoury; Rosemary Miller; Kathleen Alwell; James Gebel; Jerzy Szaflarski; Arthur Pancioli; Edward Jauch; Charles Moomaw; Rakesh Shukla; Joseph P Broderick Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-01-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Brian S Katz; Opeolu Adeoye; Heidi Sucharew; Joseph P Broderick; Jason McMullan; Pooja Khatri; Michael Widener; Kathleen S Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Brett M Kissela; Matthew L Flaherty; Daniel Woo; Simona Ferioli; Jason Mackey; Sharyl Martini; Felipe De Los Rios la Rosa; Dawn O Kleindorfer Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Felipe de Los Ríos la Rosa; Jane Khoury; Brett M Kissela; Matthew L Flaherty; Kathleen Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Pooja Khatri; Opeolu Adeoye; Daniel Woo; Simona Ferioli; Dawn O Kleindorfer Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Matthew E Ehrlich; Bin Han; Michael Lutz; Mohsen Ghiasi Ghorveh; Yasmin Ali Okeefe; Shreyansh Shah; Brad J Kolls; Carmelo Graffagnino Journal: Neurohospitalist Date: 2021-04-20
Authors: Tracy E Madsen; Heidi Sucharew; Brian Katz; Kathleen A Alwell; Charles J Moomaw; Brett M Kissela; Matthew L Flaherty; Daniel Woo; Pooja Khatri; Simona Ferioli; Jason Mackey; Sharyl Martini; Felipe De Los Rios La Rosa; Dawn Kleindorfer Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Angela M Malek; Robert J Adams; Ellen Debenham; Andrea D Boan; Abby S Kazley; Hyacinth I Hyacinth; Jenifer H Voeks; Daniel T Lackland Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 2.136