Literature DB >> 25209892

Estimate of body composition by Hume's equation: validation with DXA.

Vincenzo Carnevale1, Pamela Angela Piscitelli, Rita Minonne, Valeria Castriotta, Cristiana Cipriani, Giuseppe Guglielmi, Alfredo Scillitani, Elisabetta Romagnoli.   

Abstract

We investigated how the Hume's equation, using the antipyrine space, could perform in estimating fat mass (FM) and lean body mass (LBM). In 100 (40 male ad 60 female) subjects, we estimated FM and LBM by the equation and compared these values with those measured by a last generation DXA device. The correlation coefficients between measured and estimated FM were r = 0.940 (p < 0.0001) and between measured and estimated LBM were r = 0.913 (p < 0.0001). The Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a fair agreement between estimated and measured FM and LBM, though the equation underestimated FM and overestimated LBM in respect to DXA. The mean difference for FM was 1.40 kg (limits of agreement of -6.54 and 8.37 kg). For LBM, the mean difference in respect to DXA was 1.36 kg (limits of agreement -8.26 and 6.52 kg). The root mean square error was 3.61 kg for FM and 3.56 kg for LBM. Our results show that in clinically stable subjects the Hume's equation could reliably assess body composition, and the estimated FM and LBM approached those measured by a modern DXA device.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25209892     DOI: 10.1007/s12020-014-0419-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  19 in total

Review 1.  Body composition: why, when and for who?

Authors:  Ronan Thibault; Laurence Genton; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas.

Authors:  P Deurenberg; J A Weststrate; J C Seidell
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 3.  The impact of recent technological advances on the trueness and precision of DXA to assess body composition.

Authors:  Rebecca J Toombs; Gaele Ducher; John A Shepherd; Mary Jane De Souza
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity.

Authors:  A Must; J Spadano; E H Coakley; A E Field; G Colditz; W H Dietz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The relation of total body potassium to height, weight, and age in normal adults.

Authors:  K Boddy; P C King; R Hume; E Weyers
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Obesity in the elderly: more complicated than you think.

Authors:  Derrick C Cetin; Gaelle Nasr
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.321

8.  Prediction of lean body mass from height and weight.

Authors:  R Hume
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  The evaluation of body composition: a useful tool for clinical practice.

Authors:  Ronan Thibault; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.374

10.  A 360-degree overview of body composition in healthy people: relationships among anthropometry, ultrasonography, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Danila Diano; Federico Ponti; Eugenio Salizzoni; Ugo Albisinni; Giulio Marchesini; Giuseppe Battista
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.008

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dynamics of Anthropometric Indices in a Large Paired Cohort With 10 Years of Follow-Up: Paving the Way to Sarcopenic Obesity.

Authors:  Maria-Dolores Santos; Miquel Buti; Carolina López-Cano; Enric Sánchez; Antonieta Vidal; Marta Hernández; Antonia Lafarga; Liliana Gutiérrez-Carrasquilla; Ferran Rius; Marta Bueno; Albert Lecube
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.555

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.