Literature DB >> 25209286

Transcranial magnetic stimulation dissociates prefrontal and parietal contributions to task preparation.

Paul S Muhle-Karbe1, Michael Andres2, Marcel Brass3.   

Abstract

Cognitive control is thought to rely upon a set of distributed brain regions within frontoparietal cortex, but the functional contributions of these regions remain elusive. Here, we investigated the disruptive effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the human prefrontal and parietal cortices in task preparation at different abstraction levels. While participants completed a task-switching paradigm that assessed the reconfiguration of task goals and response sets independently, TMS was applied over the left inferior frontal junction (IFJ) and over the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) during task preparation. In Experiment 1, TMS over the IFJ caused interference with the updating of task goals, while leaving the updating of response sets unaffected. In Experiment 2, TMS over the IPS created the opposite pattern of results, perturbing only the ability to update response sets, but not task goals. Experiment 3 furthermore revealed that TMS over the IPS interfered with task goal updating when the pulses are delivered at a later point in time during preparation. This dissociation of abstract and action-related components not only reveals distinct cognitive control processes during task preparation, but also sheds new light on how prefrontal and parietal areas might work in concert to support flexible and goal-oriented control of behavior.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3412481-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive control; parietal cortex; prefrontal cortex; task preparation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25209286      PMCID: PMC6615496          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4931-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  14 in total

1.  Representational Organization of Novel Task Sets during Proactive Encoding.

Authors:  Ana F Palenciano; Carlos González-García; Juan E Arco; Luiz Pessoa; María Ruz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Declarative and procedural working memory updating processes are mutually facilitative.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Co-Activation-Based Parcellation of the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Delineates the Inferior Frontal Junction Area.

Authors:  Paul S Muhle-Karbe; Jan Derrfuss; Margaret T Lynn; Franz X Neubert; Peter T Fox; Marcel Brass; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies.

Authors:  Lysianne Beynel; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Bruce Luber; Courtney A Crowell; Susan A Hilbig; Wesley Lim; Duy Nguyen; Nicolas A Chrapliwy; Simon W Davis; Roberto Cabeza; Sarah H Lisanby; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Causal Evidence for Learning-Dependent Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Paul S Muhle-Karbe; Jiefeng Jiang; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Connectivity-Defined Subdivisions of the Intraparietal Sulcus Respond Differentially to Abstraction during Decision Making.

Authors:  Melissa Newton; Savannah L Cookson; Mark D'Esposito; Andrew Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.

Authors:  Lei Qiao; Lijie Zhang; Antao Chen; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Structure, function and connectivity fingerprints of the frontal eye field versus the inferior frontal junction: A comprehensive comparison.

Authors:  Marco Bedini; Daniel Baldauf
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.698

9.  Stochastic Dynamics Underlying Cognitive Stability and Flexibility.

Authors:  Kai Ueltzhöffer; Diana J N Armbruster-Genç; Christian J Fiebach
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Endogenous testosterone and exogenous oxytocin influence the response to baby schema in the female brain.

Authors:  Sarah K C Holtfrerich; Roland Pfister; Alexander T El Gammal; Eugen Bellon; Esther K Diekhof
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.