Literature DB >> 31473301

Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies.

Lysianne Beynel1, Lawrence G Appelbaum1, Bruce Luber2, Courtney A Crowell1, Susan A Hilbig1, Wesley Lim1, Duy Nguyen1, Nicolas A Chrapliwy1, Simon W Davis3, Roberto Cabeza4, Sarah H Lisanby5, Zhi-De Deng6.   

Abstract

Online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), applied while subjects are performing a task, is widely used to disrupt brain regions underlying cognition. However, online rTMS has also induced "paradoxical enhancement". Given the rapid proliferation of this approach, it is crucial to develop a better understanding of how online stimulation influences cognition, and the optimal parameters to achieve desired effects. To accomplish this goal, a quantitative meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models fitted to reaction time (RT) and accuracy data. The final dataset included 126 studies published between 1998 and 2016, with 244 total effects for reaction times, and 202 for accuracy. Meta-analytically, rTMS at 10 Hz and 20 Hz disrupted accuracy for attention, executive, language, memory, motor, and perception domains, while no effects were found with 1 Hz or 5 Hz. Stimulation applied at and 10 and 20 Hz slowed down RTs in attention and perception tasks. No performance enhancement was found. Meta-regression analysis showed that fMRI-guided targeting and short inter-trial intervals are associated with increased disruptive effects with rTMS. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognition; Meta-analysis; Online rTMS

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31473301      PMCID: PMC7654714          DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  159 in total

1.  Neuronal tissue polarization induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation?

Authors:  Martin Sommer; Nicolas Lang; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Case mixing and the right parietal cortex: evidence from rTMS.

Authors:  W Braet; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupts the perception and embodiment of facial expressions.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Lúcia Garrido; Vincent Walsh; Bradley C Duchaine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation to the transverse occipital sulcus affects scene but not object processing.

Authors:  Rachel E Ganaden; Caitlin R Mullin; Jennifer K E Steeves
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  TMS over right posterior parietal cortex induces neglect in a scene-based frame of reference.

Authors:  Neil G Muggleton; Peggy Postma; Karolina Moutsopoulou; Ian Nimmo-Smith; Anthony Marcel; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Integration in working memory: a magnetic stimulation study on the role of left anterior prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Nicola De Pisapia; Marco Sandrini; Todd S Braver; Luigi Cattaneo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Repetitive TMS suggests a role of the human dorsal premotor cortex in action prediction.

Authors:  Waltraud Stadler; Derek V M Ott; Anne Springer; Ricarda I Schubotz; Simone Schütz-Bosbach; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Two critical and functionally distinct stages of face and body perception.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Tanya Goldhaber; Bradley Duchaine; Vincent Walsh; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  fMRI guided rTMS evidence for reduced left prefrontal involvement after task practice.

Authors:  Johan Martijn Jansma; Tamar R van Raalten; Ruud Boessen; Sebastiaan F W Neggers; Richard H A H Jacobs; René S Kahn; Nick F Ramsey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  29 in total

1.  Beneficial Effect of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Verbal Memory and Default Mode Network in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Dong Cui; Jingna Jin; Weifang Cao; He Wang; Xin Wang; Ying Li; Tianjun Liu; Tao Yin; Zhipeng Liu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 2.  Multiple functions of the angular gyrus at high temporal resolution.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  A novel approach for targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for transcranial magnetic stimulation using a cognitive task.

Authors:  Ashley Wang; Stevan Nikolin; Adriano H Moffa; Colleen K Loo; Donel M Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Enhancing Cognitive Restructuring with Concurrent Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Transdiagnostic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Andrada D Neacsiu; Lysianne Beynel; John P Powers; Steven T Szabo; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Sarah H Lisanby; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 17.659

5.  Cognitive Enhancing Effect of High-Frequency Neuronavigated rTMS in Chronic Schizophrenia Patients With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Double-Blind Controlled 32-Week Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Mei Hong Xiu; Heng Yong Guan; Jian Min Zhao; Ke Qiang Wang; Yan Fen Pan; Xiu Ru Su; Yu Hong Wang; Jin Ming Guo; Long Jiang; Hong Yu Liu; Shi Guang Sun; Hao Ran Wu; Han Song Geng; Xiao Wen Liu; Hui Jing Yu; Bao Chun Wei; Xi Po Li; Tammy Trinh; Shu Ping Tan; Xiang Yang Zhang
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Intensity- and timing-dependent modulation of motion perception with transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual cortex.

Authors:  Olga Lucia Gamboa Arana; Hannah Palmer; Moritz Dannhauer; Connor Hile; Sicong Liu; Rena Hamdan; Alexandra Brito; Roberto Cabeza; Simon W Davis; Angel V Peterchev; Marc A Sommer; Lawrence G Appelbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  New Horizons on Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Social and Affective Cerebellum.

Authors:  Z Cattaneo; C Ferrari; A Ciricugno; E Heleven; D J L G Schutter; M Manto; F Van Overwalle
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Concurrent neuroimaging and neurostimulation reveals a causal role for dlPFC in coding of task-relevant information.

Authors:  Jade B Jackson; Eva Feredoes; Anina N Rich; Michael Lindner; Alexandra Woolgar
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-17

Review 9.  Precise Modulation Strategies for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Advances and Future Directions.

Authors:  Gangliang Zhong; Zhengyi Yang; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 10.  Self-Referential Processing Effects of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zhongjie Bao; Belal Howidi; Amer M Burhan; Paul Frewen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.