| Literature DB >> 25207745 |
Xintao Zhang1, Yukun Ma, Tian You, Xiaopeng Tian, Honglei Zhang, Qi Zhu, Wentao Zhang.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Gluteal muscle contracture (GMC) is a chronic fibrotic disease of gluteal muscles which is characterized by excessive deposition of collagen in the extracellular matrix. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-βs have been shown to play an important role in the progression of GMC. However, the underlying mechanisms are not entirely clear. We sought to explore the expression of TGF-β/Smad pathway proteins and their downstream targets in gluteal muscle contracture disease.Entities:
Keywords: Gluteal muscle contracture; PAI-1; Smad2/3; Smad7; TGF-β/Smad pathway
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25207745 PMCID: PMC4438420 DOI: 10.3109/03008207.2014.964400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Connect Tissue Res ISSN: 0300-8207 Impact factor: 3.417
Figure 1.The morphology changes in gluteal muscle contracture patients. (A) The greater trochanter was blocked by the abnormal gluteus maximus when GMC patient's hip was flexed and extended. (B) Abnormal thickening of the gluteal fascia and the related atrophic muscle. The red arrows indicate the thicking gluteal fascia (contraction band); the black arrows indicate the related atrophic muscle (adjacent muscle).
Figure 2.Protein expression of collagen types I and III examined by western blotting assay and mRNA level of collagen types I and III by RT-PCR assay in gluteal muscle contracture patients. (A) Top: Mouse anti-human monoclonal antibodies against collagen types I and III were used to detect the collagen protein in the contraction band and adjacent muscle in five GMC patients by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. Bottom: mRNA levels of collagen types I and III in the contraction band and adjacent muscle in five GMC patients. (B) Densitometric analysis of protein expression and mRNA levels of collagen types I and III in the contraction band and adjacent muscle. The results are shown as the relative expression in the contraction band compared with that in adjacent muscle of 28 GMC patients. ∗p < 0.05 compared with the adjacent muscle. (C) Up-regulated expression of collagen types I and III mRNA was examined by real-time PCR in five GMC patients, when compared with adjacent muscle tissues. Expression levels were normalized to β-actin (n = 3).
Figure 3.The protein expression of TGF-β1 examined by western blotting and mRNA level of TGF-β1 measured by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry assays. (A) Top: Mouse anti-human monoclonal antibodies against TGF-β1 were used to measure the protein of TGF-β1 expression in the contraction band and adjacent muscle in five GMC patients by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. Bottom: mRNA levels of TGF-β1 were measured by Reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction assay. (B) Densitometric analysis of protein expression and mRNA levels of TGF-β1 in the contraction band and adjacent muscle. The results are shown as the relative expression in the contraction band compared with that in adjacent muscle of 28 GMC patients. (C) Immunohistochemistry analysis for TGF-β1 in the contraction band and adjacent muscle. ((A)) normal muscle tissue without antibody (control); ((B)) the signals around nuclei show high TGF-β1 expression in contraction band; ((C)) the stain of TGF-β1 show low expression in adjacent muscle. ∗p < 0.05 compared with the adjacent muscle. The arrows indicate the cell nucleus staining with TGF-β1. (D) Up-regulated expression of TGF-β1 was examined by real-time PCR in contraction band of five GMC patients compared with adjacent muscle tissues. Expression levels were normalized to β-actin (n = 3).
Immunohistochemical analysis of TGF-β1 in the contraction band and adjacent muscle.
| TGF-β1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−) | (+) | (++) | (+++) | ||
| Adjacent muscle | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | |
| Contraction band | 1 | 4 | 11 | 12 | 0.05 |
Semi-quantitative scale: (−) = no staining; (+) = weak staining; (++) = moderate staining; and (+++) = strong staining.
∗p < 0.05 compare with the adjacent muscle.
Figure 4.R-Smad phosphorylation and Smad4 and Smad7 expression detected by western blotting assay in the contraction band and adjacent muscle. (A) Rabbit anti-human phospho-Smad2 antibody, rabbit antihuman Smad2 antibody, rabbit anti-human phospho-Smad3 antibody, rabbit anti-human Smad3 antibody were used to detect the phosphorylation status of R-Smad in the contraction band and adjacent muscle by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. (B) Densitometric analysis of R-Smad phosphorylation in the contraction band and adjacent muscle. The results are shown as the relative phosphorylation in the contraction band compared with that in adjacent muscle of 28 GMC patients. (C) Rabbit anti-Smad4, anti-Smad7 and rabbit anti-β-actin antibody were used to detect the expression of Smad4 and Smad7 in the contraction band and adjacent muscle by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. (D) Densitometric analysis of Samd4 and Smad7 expression in the contraction band and adjacent muscle. The results are shown as the relative expression in the contraction band compared with that in adjacent muscle of 28 GMC patients. ∗p < 0.05 compared with the adjacent muscle.
Figure 5.The protein expression of PAI-1 induced by TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway was detected by western blotting assay and mRNA level of PAI-1 was measured by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry assays. (A) Top: Rabbit anti-PAI-1 antibody was used to measure the expression of PAI-1 in the contraction band and adjacent muscle in five of the GMC patients by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. Bottom: mRNA levels of PAI-1 were measured by reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction assay. (B) Densitometric analysis of protein expression and mRNA levels of PAI-1 in the contraction band and adjacent muscle. The results are shown as the relative expression in the contraction band compared with that in adjacent muscle of 28 GMC patients. (C) Immunohistochemistry for PAI-1 in the contraction band and adjacent muscle. ((A)) normal muscle tissue without antibody (control); ((B)) the signals of PAI-1 around the nuclei show a high expression in the contraction band; ((C)) the stain of PAI-1 shows a low expression in adjacent muscle. ∗p < 0.05 compared with the adjacent muscle. The arrows indicate the cell nucleus staining with PAI-1. (D) Up-regulated expression of PAI-1 was examined by real-time PCR in 5 GMC patients, when compared with adjacent muscle tissues. Expression levels were normalized to β-actin (n = 3).
Immunohistochemical analysis of PAI-1 in the contraction band and adjacent muscle.
| PAI-1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−) | (+) | (++) | (+++) | ||
| Adjacent muscle | 13 | 8 | 6 | 1 | |
| Contraction band | 3 | 4 | 8 | 13 | 0.05 |
Semi-quantitative scale: (−) = no staining; (+) = weak staining; (++) = moderate staining; and (+++) = strong staining.
∗p < 0.05 compare with the adjacent muscle.