| Literature DB >> 32049835 |
Tian You1, Bei Yang2, Xin-Tao Zhang1, Shi-You Ren1, Lu Bai1, Fu-Jia Jiao1, Xiao-Cheng Jiang1, Si-Yao Guan1, Wen-Tao Zhang1.
Abstract
The study assessed the pelvic dimensions by computed tomography (CT) performed for gluteal muscle contracture women, and evaluated the impact of malformations on several essential obstetric parameters.The CT pelvimetry was retrospectively performed in 25 gluteal muscle contracture women selected consecutively whether they had delivery history or not. Among the pelvic inlet plane, the mid plane and the outlet plane, 12 indicators including the transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet, the conjugate vera, the diagonal conjugate, the biischial diameter, the anteroposterior diameter of the middle pelvis, transverse outlet, the posterior sagittal diameter of outlet, the conjugate of the outlet, the anterior sagittal diameter of the outlet, the curvature and length of the sacrum, the angle of pubic arch were collected.Finally, the mean age of these women was 26.6 ± 5.0 years. Most pelvises had anteroposterior elliptical appearance in inlet and size of the female pelvis. The most statistically different and most clinically significant indicator was the biischial diameter, gluteal muscle contracture women were 95.6 ± 9.3 mm and the normal women from other study were 105.0 ± 7.9 mm, the comparison showed a significant difference (P < .001).Generally, most gluteal muscle contracture women had features of anthropoid pelvis which were quite different from normal Chinese female. These results may serve as a basis for future studies to assess its utility and prognostic value for a safe vaginal delivery in gluteal muscle contracture women.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32049835 PMCID: PMC7035071 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Measured parameters with 3-dimensional computed tomography. A = The midpoint of the superior border of sacral promontory, B = the midpoint of the superior border of symphysis pubis, C = the sacrococcygeal joint, D = the midpoint of the inferior margin of symphysis pubis, E = the midpoint of the S4/5 sacral vertebral joint, F = the centrum of the third sacral vertebrae, G = the transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet, H = the biischial diameter; I and J = the bilateral ischiopubic rami, K = the transverse outlet, L = the conjugate of the outlet, M = the conjugate vera, N = the anteroposterior diameter of the middle pelvis, O = the diagonal conjugate, P = the length of sacrum, Q = the upper part of sacrum, R = the lower part of sacrum, S = the curvature of sacrum, T = the angle of pubic arch, U = the anterior sagittal diameter of the outlet, V = the posterior sagittal diameter of outlet.
The data of participants.
Figure 2One of the 3 gynecoid type pelvis using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Figure 3One of the 22 anthropoid type pelvis using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
The comparison with literature data from Liu's study[ (2-sample t test).