Literature DB >> 25207381

Sunscreens.

Guido Bens.   

Abstract

Sunscreens have become since more than 40 years the most popular means of protection against UV radiation (UVR) in Western countries. Organic and inorganic filters with different absorption spectrum exist. They filter or scatter UVR. Protection from UVB is quantified as a minimal erythema dose-based sun protection factor. UVA protection testing is less standardized: Persistent pigment darkening and critical wavelength are currently used methods. Marketing and labeling of sunscreens underlay national regulation which explains major differences between the European and the US sunscreen market. Sunscreens are most performing in sunburn prevention. Broad spectrum UVB and UVA protection and regular application in sufficient amounts are essential for prevention of skin cancers, UV-induced immunosuppression, and skin aging. A significant benefit from regular sunscreen use has not yet been demonstrated for primary prevention of basal cell carcinoma and melanoma. Concerning the prevention of actinic keratoses, squamous cell carcinomas, and skin aging, the effect of sunscreens is significant, but it remains incomplete. Some organic UV filters (PABA derivatives, cinnamates, benzophenones, and octocrylene) have been described to cause photoallergy. Percutaneous absorption and endocrine disrupting activity of small-sized organic and nano-sized inorganic UV filters have been reported. On lesional skin and in pediatric settings, these products should be used with caution. Cutaneous vitamin D synthesis depending on skin-carcinogenic UVB radiation, the potential risk of vitamin D deficiency by sunscreen use has become a major subject of public health debate. Sunscreens indeed impair vitamin D synthesis if they are used in the recommended amount of 2 mg/cm2, but not in lesser thickness below 1.5 mg/cm2 that corresponds better to what users apply in real life conditions. Large molecular last generation UVB-UVA broad spectrum sunscreens have a better benefit-risk ratio than former organic filters: They offer better protection in the UVA band, they are non toxic and non allergenic. A better outcome of sunscreen efficacy especially in primary skin cancer prevention may be achieved with these molecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25207381     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0437-2_25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  10 in total

1.  Transcriptomic and histological analysis of exposed facial skin areas wrinkled or not and unexposed skin.

Authors:  Renan Paulo Martin; Patricia Varela; Caio Peres Gomes; Maryana Mara Marins; Rafael Filippelli-Silva; Samira Yarak; Juliana L M Soares; Adriana Sanudo; Jolanta Idkowiak-Baldys; Siming Chen; Cheng Hwang; Yong Zhuang; John Lyga; João Bosco Pesquero; Edileia Bagatin
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Comparative analysis of the relative potential of silver, Zinc-oxide and titanium-dioxide nanoparticles against UVB-induced DNA damage for the prevention of skin carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Nikhil Tyagi; Sanjeev K Srivastava; Sumit Arora; Yousef Omar; Zohaib Mohammad Ijaz; Ahmed Al-Ghadhban; Sachin K Deshmukh; James E Carter; Ajay P Singh; Seema Singh
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 3.  [Actinic keratoses].

Authors:  T Hommel; R-M Szeimies
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 4.  Visible light. Part II: Photoprotection against visible and ultraviolet light.

Authors:  Amaris N Geisler; Evan Austin; Julie Nguyen; Iltefat Hamzavi; Jared Jagdeo; Henry W Lim
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Blue-violet light irradiation dose dependently decreases carotenoids in human skin, which indicates the generation of free radicals.

Authors:  Staffan Vandersee; Marc Beyer; Juergen Lademann; Maxim E Darvin
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  Long-term exposure to commercially available sunscreens containing nanoparticles of TiO2 and ZnO revealed no biological impact in a hairless mouse model.

Authors:  Megan J Osmond-McLeod; Yalchin Oytam; Anthony Rowe; Fariborz Sobhanmanesh; Gavin Greenoak; Jason Kirby; Elizabeth F McInnes; Maxine J McCall
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 9.400

7.  Transcriptome Analysis Identifies the Dysregulation of Ultraviolet Target Genes in Human Skin Cancers.

Authors:  Yao Shen; Arianna L Kim; Rong Du; Liang Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Global Trends of Sunscreen Research Literature: A Bibliometric Analysis over the Period of 2010-2020.

Authors:  Manjula S Naik; Rajat J Polad; Mahika M Joshi; Virendra S Ligade
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

9.  Dandelion Extracts Protect Human Skin Fibroblasts from UVB Damage and Cellular Senescence.

Authors:  Yafan Yang; Shuangshuang Li
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 10.  Vitamin D and Skin Cancer: An Epidemiological, Patient-Centered Update and Review.

Authors:  Alejandro Martin-Gorgojo; Yolanda Gilaberte; Eduardo Nagore
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 5.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.