Literature DB >> 27693632

Comparative analysis of the relative potential of silver, Zinc-oxide and titanium-dioxide nanoparticles against UVB-induced DNA damage for the prevention of skin carcinogenesis.

Nikhil Tyagi1, Sanjeev K Srivastava1, Sumit Arora1, Yousef Omar2, Zohaib Mohammad Ijaz3, Ahmed Al-Ghadhban1, Sachin K Deshmukh1, James E Carter4, Ajay P Singh5, Seema Singh6.   

Abstract

Sunscreen formulations containing UVB filters, such as Zinc-oxide (ZnO) and titanium-dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles (NPs) have been developed to limit the exposure of human skin to UV-radiations. Unfortunately, these UVB protective agents have failed in controlling the skin cancer incidence. We recently demonstrated that silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) could serve as novel protective agents against UVB-radiations. Here our goal was to perform comparative analysis of direct and indirect UVB-protection efficacy of ZnO-, TiO2- and Ag-NPs. Sun-protection-factor calculated based on their UVB-reflective/absorption abilities was the highest for TiO2-NPs followed by Ag- and ZnO-NPs. This was further confirmed by studying indirect protection of UVB radiation-induced death of HaCaT cells. However, only Ag-NPs were active in protecting HaCaT cells against direct UVB-induced DNA-damage by repairing bulky-DNA lesions through nucleotide-excision-repair mechanism. Moreover, Ag-NPs were also effective in protecting HaCaT cells from UVB-induced oxidative DNA damage by enhancing SOD/CAT/GPx activity. In contrast, ZnO- and TiO2-NPs not only failed in providing any direct protection from DNA-damage, but rather enhanced oxidative DNA-damage by increasing ROS production. Together, these findings raise concerns about safety of ZnO- and TiO2-NPs and establish superior protective efficacy of Ag-NPs.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA lesions (CPDs, 6-4 PPs); Reactive oxygen species (ROS); Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs); Sun protection factor (SPF); Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO(2)NPs); Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27693632      PMCID: PMC5086276          DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  40 in total

1.  A comparison of in vivo and in vitro testing of sunscreening formulas.

Authors:  R M Sayre; P P Agin; G J LeVee; E Marlowe
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Incidence Estimate of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (Keratinocyte Carcinomas) in the U.S. Population, 2012.

Authors:  Howard W Rogers; Martin A Weinstock; Steven R Feldman; Brett M Coldiron
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  In vitro toxicity evaluation of 25-nm anatase TiO2 nanoparticles in immortalized keratinocyte cells.

Authors:  Jin Chan; Tang Ying; Yang F Guang; Li X Lin; Tang Kai; Zhang Y Fang; Ye X Ting; Lin F Xing; Yang Y Ji
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Ultraviolet radiation-mediated damage to cellular DNA.

Authors:  Jean Cadet; Evelyne Sage; Thierry Douki
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Using silver nanoparticle to enhance current response of biosensor.

Authors:  Xiangling Ren; Xianwei Meng; Dong Chen; Fangqiong Tang; Jun Jiao
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 10.618

6.  UVB light stimulates production of reactive oxygen species: unexpected role for catalase.

Authors:  Diane E Heck; Anna M Vetrano; Thomas M Mariano; Jeffrey D Laskin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Oxidative stress and skin cancer: an overview.

Authors:  R T Narendhirakannan; M Angeline Christie Hannah
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-11-23

8.  Phototoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles in HaCaT keratinocytes-generation of oxidative DNA damage during UVA and visible light irradiation.

Authors:  Chia-Chi Wang; Shuguang Wang; Qingsu Xia; Weiwei He; Jun-Jie Yin; Peter P Fu; Jih-Heng Li
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2013-06

9.  Nanodiamonds protect skin from ultraviolet B-induced damage in mice.

Authors:  Meng-Si Wu; Der-Shan Sun; Yu-Chung Lin; Chia-Liang Cheng; Shih-Che Hung; Po-Kong Chen; Jen-Hung Yang; Hsin-Hou Chang
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 10.435

10.  Protective Effect of Diphlorethohydroxycarmalol against Ultraviolet B Radiation-Induced DNA Damage by Inducing the Nucleotide Excision Repair System in HaCaT Human Keratinocytes.

Authors:  Mei Jing Piao; Susara Ruwan Kumara Madduma Hewage; Xia Han; Kyoung Ah Kang; Hee Kyoung Kang; Nam Ho Lee; Jin Won Hyun
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.118

View more
  15 in total

1.  Effect of oxidative stress from nanoscale TiO2 particles on a Physarum polycephalum macroplasmodium under dark conditions.

Authors:  Zhi Zhang; Jianhua Zhang; Caixia Shi; Heng Guo; RuiYang Ni; Junle Qu; Jiaoning Tang; Shide Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Dopamine Prevents Ultraviolet B-induced Development and Progression of Premalignant Cutaneous Lesions through its D2 Receptors.

Authors:  Kai Lu; Madhavi Bhat; Sara Peters; Rita Mitra; Xiaokui Mo; Tatiana M Oberyszyn; Partha Sarathi Dasgupta; Sujit Basu
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-04-12

3.  Suppression of beta 2 adrenergic receptor actions prevent UVB mediated cutaneous squamous cell tumorigenesis through inhibition of VEGF-A induced angiogenesis.

Authors:  Kai Lu; Madhavi Bhat; Sara Peters; Rita Mitra; Tatiana Oberyszyn; Sujit Basu
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.784

4.  Aluminum plasmonic nanoshielding in ultraviolet inactivation of bacteria.

Authors:  Jeremy N Kunz; Dmitri V Voronine; Weigang Lu; Zachary Liege; Ho Wai Howard Lee; Zhenrong Zhang; Marlan O Scully
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Increased Level of α2,6-Sialylated Glycans on HaCaT Cells Induced by Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles under UV Radiation.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Ren; Xin Liu; Runqing Geng; Qunwei Lu; Rong Rao; Xi Tan; Xiangliang Yang; Wei Liu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 6.  Role of let-7 family microRNA in breast cancer.

Authors:  Chadrashekar Kagepura Thammaiah; Shankar Jayaram
Journal:  Noncoding RNA Res       Date:  2016-11-04

Review 7.  Evaluation of immunoresponses and cytotoxicity from skin exposure to metallic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Menglei Wang; Xuan Lai; Longquan Shao; Li Li
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-08-01

Review 8.  Cancer Chemoprevention by Phytochemicals: Nature's Healing Touch.

Authors:  Haseeb Zubair; Shafquat Azim; Aamir Ahmad; Mohammad Aslam Khan; Girijesh Kumar Patel; Seema Singh; Ajay Pratap Singh
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 9.  TiO2 - do we have to worry about it? One of the important aetiological factors in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Sara Jarmakiewicz-Czaja; Aneta Sokal; Jacek Tabarkiewicz; Rafał Filip
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 10.  The Roles of Autophagy and the Inflammasome during Environmental Stress-Triggered Skin Inflammation.

Authors:  Rong-Jane Chen; Yu-Hsuan Lee; Ya-Ling Yeh; Ying-Jan Wang; Bour-Jr Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.