| Literature DB >> 27693632 |
Nikhil Tyagi1, Sanjeev K Srivastava1, Sumit Arora1, Yousef Omar2, Zohaib Mohammad Ijaz3, Ahmed Al-Ghadhban1, Sachin K Deshmukh1, James E Carter4, Ajay P Singh5, Seema Singh6.
Abstract
Sunscreen formulations containing UVB filters, such as Zinc-oxide (ZnO) and titanium-dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles (NPs) have been developed to limit the exposure of human skin to UV-radiations. Unfortunately, these UVB protective agents have failed in controlling the skin cancer incidence. We recently demonstrated that silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) could serve as novel protective agents against UVB-radiations. Here our goal was to perform comparative analysis of direct and indirect UVB-protection efficacy of ZnO-, TiO2- and Ag-NPs. Sun-protection-factor calculated based on their UVB-reflective/absorption abilities was the highest for TiO2-NPs followed by Ag- and ZnO-NPs. This was further confirmed by studying indirect protection of UVB radiation-induced death of HaCaT cells. However, only Ag-NPs were active in protecting HaCaT cells against direct UVB-induced DNA-damage by repairing bulky-DNA lesions through nucleotide-excision-repair mechanism. Moreover, Ag-NPs were also effective in protecting HaCaT cells from UVB-induced oxidative DNA damage by enhancing SOD/CAT/GPx activity. In contrast, ZnO- and TiO2-NPs not only failed in providing any direct protection from DNA-damage, but rather enhanced oxidative DNA-damage by increasing ROS production. Together, these findings raise concerns about safety of ZnO- and TiO2-NPs and establish superior protective efficacy of Ag-NPs.Entities:
Keywords: DNA lesions (CPDs, 6-4 PPs); Reactive oxygen species (ROS); Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs); Sun protection factor (SPF); Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO(2)NPs); Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnONPs)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27693632 PMCID: PMC5086276 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.09.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Lett ISSN: 0304-3835 Impact factor: 8.679