Literature DB >> 15936361

Cage containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (Triosite) for the treatment of cervical spondylosis.

Der-Yang Cho1, Wuen-Yen Lee, Pon-Chun Sheu, Chun-Chung Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the fusion efficacy and clinical outcomes of a cage containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (Triosite) in treating cervical spondylosis.
METHODS: We randomly divided 100 patients with cervical spondylosis undergoing anterior discectomy with interbody polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fusion into 2 groups in the past 2 years: group A (n = 50), PEEK cage containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (Triosite), and group B (n = 50), PEEK cage containing an autogenous iliac bone graft. We compared the fusion rate, fusion time, spinal curvature, and neuroforamen size between the 2 groups. We also compared excess operation time, excess blood loss, hospital stay, complications, and neurological recovery status between the groups.
RESULTS: The fusion rates were 57%, 67%, 77%, 82%, 92%, and 100% in group A and 81%, 86%, 95%, 95% 100%, and 100% in group B in the first 6 postoperative months. The fusion rate in group A was significantly lower than that in group B in the first 5 months after the procedure (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively), but the fusion rate reached 100% in both groups by the sixth month. Within the first 6 months, as the fusion level increased, the fusion rates reduced and time to fusion was delayed in both groups. There were no donor site complications in group A. However, 3 patients (6%) from group B experienced complications (1, wound infection; 1, numbness of thigh; and 1, subcutaneous hematoma) (P < .001). The hospital stay was shorter in group A (4.43 +/- 2.36 days) than in group B (7.00 +/- 3.77 days) (P = .001). The mean excessive blood loss and excessive operative time for an iliac bone graft in group B were 15 +/- 5 mL and 10 +/- 6 minutes. There was no statistical significance in spinal curve correction, neuroforamen enlargement, and neurological recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: A cage containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic resulted in complete fusion by the sixth postoperative month, although the fusion rate was lower than that in a cage containing an autograft during the first 5 months after the operation and the time to fusion was delayed. Using a cage containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic leads to a shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, shorter operative time, and no donor site complications. It seemed to be a good substitute for cervical spondylotic fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15936361     DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  20 in total

Review 1.  Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony Minh Tien Chau; Lileane Liang Xu; Johnny Ho-Yin Wong; Ralph Jasper Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  I Noordhoek; M T Koning; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Ryan Cassilly; Winifred Cantor; Emmanuel Edusei; Qusai Hammouri; Thomas Errico
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Implantation of an empty polyetheretherketone cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomised controlled study with 2 years follow-up.

Authors:  Shang-Wen Feng; Ming-Chau Chang; Po-Hsin Chou; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A prospective randomized comparison of PEEK cage containing calcium sulphate or demineralized bone matrix with autograft in anterior cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  Youzhuan Xie; Hua Li; Junjie Yuan; Lingjie Fu; Jianwei Yang; Pu Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Anterior cervical fusion for radicular-disc conflict performed by three different procedures: clinical and radiographic analysis at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  A Zagra; L Zagra; L Scaramuzzo; L Minoia; M Archetti; F Giudici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Anterior cervical fusion with a bio-resorbable composite cage (beta TCP-PLLA): clinical and radiological results from a prospective study on 20 patients.

Authors:  F Debusscher; S Aunoble; Y Alsawad; D Clement; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) autograft versus graft substitutes: what do patients prefer?-A clinical study.

Authors:  Monish M Maharaj; Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

Review 9.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; John N Devine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Comparison of outcomes and safety of using hydroxyapatite granules as a substitute for autograft in cervical cages for anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hosein Mashhadinezhad; Fariborz Samini; Reza Zare
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.