Literature DB >> 25207090

Sequential test selection by quantifying of the reduction in diagnostic uncertainty for the diagnosis of proximal caries.

Umut Arslan1, Ahmet Ergun Karaağaoğlu1, Nursel Akkaya2, Leyla Berna Cağırankaya2, Ayşe Özden Kansu2, Hilmi Kansu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to determine the presence or absence of a certain disease, multiple diagnostic tests may be necessary. Performance of these tests can be sequentially evaluated. AIMS: The aim of the study is to determine the contribution of the test in each step, in reducing diagnostic uncertainty when multiple tests are sequentially used for the diagnosis. STUDY
DESIGN: Diagnostic accuracy study.
METHODS: Radiographs of seventy-three patients of the Department of Dento-Maxillofacial Radiology of Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry were assessed. Panoramic (PAN), full mouth intraoral (FM), and bitewing (BW) radiographs were used for the diagnosis of proximal caries in the maxillary and mandibular molar regions. Diagnostic performance of radiography was sequentially evaluated by using the reduction in diagnostic uncertainty.
RESULTS: FM provided maximum diagnostic information for ruling in potential in the maxillary and mandibular molar regions in the first step. FM provided more diagnostic information than BW radiographs for ruling in the mandibular region in the second step. In the mandibular region, BW radiographs provided more diagnostic information than FM for ruling out in the first step.
CONCLUSION: The presented method in this study provides the clinicians with a solution for the decision of the sequential selection of diagnostic tests for the correct diagnosis of the presence or absence of a certain disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Test sequence; proximal caries; radiographic methods; reduction in uncertainty

Year:  2013        PMID: 25207090      PMCID: PMC4115965          DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Balkan Med J        ISSN: 2146-3123            Impact factor:   2.021


  19 in total

1.  Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests.

Authors:  N Dendukuri; L Joseph
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine.

Authors:  R A Danforth; D E Clark
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-02

3.  Routine panoramic radiography of new adult patients in general dental practice: relevance of diagnostic yield to treatment and identification of radiographic selection criteria.

Authors:  V E Rushton; K Horner; H V Worthington
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2002-04

4.  Mutual information as an index of diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  W A Benish
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 5.  Clinical evaluation of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Susan Weinstein; Nancy A Obuchowski; Michael L Lieber
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Diagnosis by the bit: a method for evaluating the diagnostic process.

Authors:  H A Johnson
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.256

7.  A comparison of combinations of clinical and radiographic examinations in evaluation of a dental clinic population.

Authors:  A Galal; L Manson-Hing; H Jamison
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1985-11

8.  Evaluation of receiver operating characteristic curve data in terms of information theory, with applications in radiography.

Authors:  C E Metz; D J Goodenough; K Rossmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Panoramic roentgenograms compared with conventional intraoral roentgenograms.

Authors:  J L Stewart; L F Bieser
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1968-07

Review 10.  Diagnostic information as a commodity.

Authors:  H A Johnson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 8.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.