Literature DB >> 12874659

Mutual information as an index of diagnostic test performance.

W A Benish1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This paper demonstrates that diagnostic test performance can be quantified as the average amount of information the test result (R) provides about the disease state (D).
METHODS: A fundamental concept of information theory, mutual information, is directly applicable to this problem. This statistic quantifies the amount of information that one random variable contains about another random variable. Prior to performing a diagnostic test, R and D are random variables. Hence, their mutual information, I(D;R), is the amount of information that R provides about D.
RESULTS: I(D;R) is a function of both 1). the pretest probabilities of the disease state and 2). the set of conditional probabilities relating each possible test result to each possible disease state. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a popular measure of diagnostic test performance which, in contrast to I(D;R), is independent of the pretest probabilities; it is a function of only the set of conditional probabilities. The AUC is not a measure of diagnostic information.
CONCLUSIONS: Because I(D;R) is dependent upon pretest probabilities, knowledge of the setting in which a diagnostic test is employed is a necessary condition for quantifying the amount of information it provides. Advantages of I(D;R) over the AUC are that it can be calculated without invoking an arbitrary curve fitting routine, it is applicable to situations in which multiple diagnoses are under consideration, and it quantifies test performance in meaningful units (bits of information).

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12874659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  11 in total

1.  Comparing the value of mammographic features and genetic variants in breast cancer risk prediction.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Jie Liu; David Page; Peggy Peissig; Catherine McCarty; Adedayo A Onitilo; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  A comprehensive methodology for determining the most informative mammographic features.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Oguzhan Alagoz; Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; David J Vanness; Ryan Woods; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Sequential test selection by quantifying of the reduction in diagnostic uncertainty for the diagnosis of proximal caries.

Authors:  Umut Arslan; Ahmet Ergun Karaağaoğlu; Nursel Akkaya; Leyla Berna Cağırankaya; Ayşe Özden Kansu; Hilmi Kansu
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.021

4.  Using multidimensional mutual information to prioritize mammographic features for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Y Wu; D J Vanness; E S Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

5.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests using information theory for multi-class diagnostic problems and its application for the detection of occlusal caries lesions.

Authors:  Umut Arslan; Ergun Karaağaoğlu; Gökhan Özkan; Aydan Kanlı
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.021

6.  Using information theory to optimize a diagnostic threshold to match physician-ordering practice.

Authors:  Mark A Zaydman; Jonathan R Brestoff; Ronald Jackups
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Mutual Information as a Performance Measure for Binary Predictors Characterized by Both ROC Curve and PROC Curve Analysis.

Authors:  Gareth Hughes; Jennifer Kopetzky; Neil McRoberts
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.524

Review 8.  A Review of the Application of Information Theory to Clinical Diagnostic Testing.

Authors:  William A Benish
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.524

Review 9.  Fifty years of Shannon information theory in assessing the accuracy and agreement of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Alberto Casagrande; Francesco Fabris; Rossano Girometti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Information theoretic quantification of diagnostic uncertainty.

Authors:  M Brandon Westover; Nathaniel A Eiseman; Sydney S Cash; Matt T Bianchi
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.