Literature DB >> 25201250

A descriptive review of the prevalence and risk factors of hock lesions in dairy cows.

E Kester1, M Holzhauer2, K Frankena3.   

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on hock lesions in dairy cattle, focusing in particular on their prevalence and associated clinical signs, as well as the scoring systems used to assess them and the data on risk factors. This analysis was limited to hock lesions where there was inflammation and damage of the skin and the subcutaneous tissue only without involvement of the joint. The presence of hock lesions, or tarsal peri-arthritis, is strongly related to time spent lying on abrasive surfaces, prolonged high local pressure or friction of the hock on hard surfaces, and collisions of the hock with cubicle fittings. Since hocks have almost no fatty tissue or muscles between the bones and skin, there is no protection against these types of trauma and skin damage occurs (resulting in hock lesions). The risk of these lesions becoming infected is strongly dependent on the hygiene of the lying area. The prevalence of hock lesions in dairy cows is generally reported as high (>50%). As hock lesions are often correlated with lameness, they are associated with economic losses and impaired welfare, as well as negative societal perception of the dairy sector. Alterations in cubicle characteristics, bedding material, pasture access and lameness prevention may all lower the prevalence of hock lesions; nevertheless, the actual relationship between housing design and other cow- and management-related risk factors on the occurrence of hock lesions appears to be complex and interrelated.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dairy cows; Hock lesions; Prevalence; Review; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25201250     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  10 in total

1.  The Effect of Hock Injury Laterality and Lameness on Lying Behaviors and Lying Laterality in Holstein Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Nicole L Eberhart; Peter D Krawczel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Resource, Collaborator, or Individual Cow? Applying Q Methodology to Investigate Austrian Farmers' Viewpoints on Motivational Aspects of Improving Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Lorenz Maurer; Josef Schenkenfelder; Christoph Winckler
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-12

3.  Effects of Housing and Management Factors on Selected Indicators of the Welfare Quality® Protocol in Loose-Housed Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Daniel Gieseke; Christian Lambertz; Matthias Gauly
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-13

4.  Retrospective Evaluation of Septic Subtendinous Calcaneal Bursitis in 29 Cattle.

Authors:  Johann Kofler; Florian Sullmann
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Anatomical distribution and gross pathology of wounds in necropsied farmed mink (Neovison vison) from June and October.

Authors:  Anna Jespersen; Jens Frederik Agger; Tove Clausen; Stine Bertelsen; Henrik Elvang Jensen; Anne Sofie Hammer
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 6.  Association between Lameness and Indicators of Dairy Cow Welfare Based on Locomotion Scoring, Body and Hock Condition, Leg Hygiene and Lying Behavior.

Authors:  Mohammed B Sadiq; Siti Z Ramanoon; Wan Mastura Shaik Mossadeq; Rozaihan Mansor; Sharifah Salmah Syed-Hussain
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Hock lesions in dairy cows in freestall herds: a cross-sectional study of prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Lisa Ekman; Ann-Kristin Nyman; Håkan Landin; Karin Persson Waller
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 1.695

8.  Carpal, tarsal, and stifle skin lesion prevalence and potential risk factors in Swiss dairy cows kept in tie stalls: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Johanna Karin Bernhard; Beatriz Vidondo; Rahel Lisa Achermann; Rahel Rediger; Kerstin Elisabeth Müller; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cattle Cleanliness from the View of Swedish Farmers and Official Animal Welfare Inspectors.

Authors:  Frida Lundmark Hedman; Maria Andersson; Vanja Kinch; Amelie Lindholm; Angelica Nordqvist; Rebecka Westin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Evaluating Alternatives to Locomotion Scoring for Detecting Lameness in Pasture-Based Dairy Cattle in New Zealand: In-Parlour Scoring.

Authors:  Chacha W Werema; Dan A Yang; Linda J Laven; Kristina R Mueller; Richard A Laven
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.