Literature DB >> 33585598

Resource, Collaborator, or Individual Cow? Applying Q Methodology to Investigate Austrian Farmers' Viewpoints on Motivational Aspects of Improving Animal Welfare.

Lorenz Maurer1, Josef Schenkenfelder1, Christoph Winckler1.   

Abstract

One keystone to successful welfare improvement endeavors is a respected cooperation between farmer and advisor (e.g., veterinarian), which requires a thorough understanding of what motivates farmer behavior. In this respect, Q methodology offers a promising approach in investigating individual motivational patterns and to discriminate between and describe typologies of farmers. In our study we explored, based on a sample of 34 Austrian dairy farmers, how 39 potentially motivating statements regarding the improvement of dairy cow health and welfare were assessed. We were able to identify and describe four different viewpoints, explaining 47% of total study variance. All four viewpoints have in common that pride in a healthy herd is motivating to work toward improved animal health and welfare to a certain extent, but meeting legal requirements is rather not. Viewpoint 1 acknowledges welfare for economic performance, ease of work and short working hours but does not make allowance for outside interference. Participants loading on Viewpoint 2 also show a focus on economic aspects but, keep close track of the animal welfare debate recognizing its potential to improve the public image of dairy farming. Even though they cautiously criticize an exploitative application of dairy farming, they do not want to be understood as role models. With regards to animal welfare, farmers sharing Viewpoint 3 perceive themselves as superior to and show little reluctance of comparison with mainstream farming. For them, the animal as sentient being itself owns some intrinsic value and it is necessary to strike a balance between economic and other, ethical considerations. Viewpoint 4 perceives cows as equal collaborators who deserve to be treated with respect and appreciation and is willing to accept certain economic losses in order to maintain high standards regarding animal health and welfare. Using Q methodology, we have been able to draw high resolution images of different farmer typologies, enabling advisors to tailor intervention strategies specifically addressing leverage points with a high chance of farmer compliance.
Copyright © 2021 Maurer, Schenkenfelder and Winckler.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Q methodology; cow; dairy; farmer; improvement; motivation; viewpoint; welfare

Year:  2021        PMID: 33585598      PMCID: PMC7873868          DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.607925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Vet Sci        ISSN: 2297-1769


  35 in total

1.  Identifying the factors impacting on farmers' intention to adopt animal friendly practices.

Authors:  João Augusto Rossi Borges; Carla Heloisa de Faria Domingues; Fabiana Ribeiro Caldara; Nadir Paula da Rosa; Igor Senger; Diego Gomes Freire Guidolin
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Explaining mastitis incidence in Dutch dairy farming: the influence of farmers' attitudes and behaviour.

Authors:  J Jansen; B H P van den Borne; R J Renes; G van Schaik; T J G M Lam; C Leeuwis
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Selection for increased production and the welfare of dairy cows: are new breeding goals needed?

Authors:  Pascal A Oltenacu; Bo Algers
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Risk factors for clinical mastitis in herds with a low bulk milk somatic cell count. 1. Data and risk factors for all cases.

Authors:  Y H Schukken; F J Grommers; D Van de Geer; H N Erb; A Brand
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 5.  Challenging the myth of the irrational dairy farmer; understanding decision-making related to herd health.

Authors:  E Kristensen; E B Jakobsen
Journal:  N Z Vet J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.628

6.  Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 2. Understanding dairy farmers' motivations.

Authors:  K A Leach; H R Whay; C M Maggs; Z E Barker; E S Paul; A K Bell; D C J Main
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.534

7.  Tie-stall design and its relationship to lameness, injury, and cleanliness on 317 Ontario dairy farms.

Authors:  K Zurbrigg; D Kelton; N Anderson; S Millman
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Lameness prevalence and risk factors in organic and non-organic dairy herds in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Kenneth M D Rutherford; Fritha M Langford; Mhairi C Jack; Lorna Sherwood; Alistair B Lawrence; Marie J Haskell
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 2.688

9.  A mixed methods inquiry: How dairy farmers perceive the value(s) of their involvement in an intensive dairy herd health management program.

Authors:  Erling Kristensen; Carsten Enevoldsen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 1.695

10.  Bootstrapping Q Methodology to Improve the Understanding of Human Perspectives.

Authors:  Aiora Zabala; Unai Pascual
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.