Literature DB >> 25200052

Clinical outcomes after implantation of a centrifugal flow left ventricular assist device and concurrent cardiac valve procedures.

Carmelo Milano1, Francis D Pagani2, Mark S Slaughter2, Duc Thinh Pham2, David R Hathaway2, Mary V Jacoski2, Kevin B Najarian2, Keith D Aaronson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac valve procedures are commonly performed concurrently during implantation of left ventricular assist devices, but the added procedural risk has not been studied in detail. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data from patients receiving the HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device in the ADVANCE bridge to transplant (BTT) trial and continued access protocol were reviewed. Of 382 consecutive patients who completed follow-up between August 2008 and June 2013 (mean time on support 389 days, median 271 days), 262 (68.6%) underwent isolated HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device implantation, 75 (19.6%) a concurrent valve procedure, and 45 (11.8%) concurrent nonvalvular procedures. Of the concurrent valve procedures, 56 were tricuspid, 13 aortic, and 6 mitral. Survival was similar between groups (79% for concurrent valve procedures and 85% for HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device only at 1 year; P=0.33). Concurrent valve procedures were also associated with increased unadjusted early right heart failure (RHF). A multivariable analysis for death and RHF (121 total events) identified female sex (odds ratio=2.0 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.3; P=0.0053]) and preimplant tricuspid regurgitation severity (odds ratio=2.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.8-4.8, P<0.0001]) as independent predictors while concurrent tricuspid valve procedures (TVP) were not predictors. Furthermore, patients with significant preimplant tricuspid regurgitation who did not receive a TVP experienced an increased rate of late RHF compared with those who received TVP (0.19 versus 0.05 events per patient-year, respectively; P=0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device alone, survival was equivalent for the concurrent valve procedure group. Tricuspid regurgitation severity was the most important predictor of increased postoperative RHF, and concurrent TVP was not an independent predictor of RHF overall. Concurrent TVP may reduce the rate of late RHF for patients with significant preimplant tricuspid insufficiency. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00751972.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart failure; heart-assist devices; thoracic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25200052     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac surgery 2014 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Constanze Strüning; Alexandros Moschovas; David Gonzalez-Lopez; Ilija Valchanov; Hristo Kirov; Mahmoud Diab; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Impact of mitral valve intervention with left ventricular assist device implantation on postoperative outcomes and morphologic change.

Authors:  Hiroki Hata; Tomoyuki Fujita; Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda; Kensuke Kuroda; Osamu Seguchi; Yorihiko Matsumoto; Masanobu Yanase; Takuma Sato; Seiko Nakajima; Norihide Fukushima; Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 3.  Non-patient factors associated with infections in LVAD recipients: A scoping review.

Authors:  Supriya Shore; Michael J Pienta; Tessa M F Watt; Gardner Yost; Whitney A Townsend; Lourdes Cabrera; Michael D Fetters; Carol Chenoweth; Keith D Aaronson; Francis D Pagani; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 13.569

4.  Durability and Efficacy of Tricuspid Valve Repair in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Yaron D Barac; Alina Nicoara; Muath Bishawi; Jacob N Schroder; Mani A Daneshmand; Nazish K Hashmi; Eric Velazquez; Joseph G Rogers; Chetan B Patel; Carmelo A Milano
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 12.035

5.  Early Right Ventricular Assist Device Use in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence and Risk Factors From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Michael S Kiernan; E Wilson Grandin; Marshall Brinkley; Navin K Kapur; Duc Thinh Pham; Robin Ruthazer; J Eduardo Rame; Pavan Atluri; Edo Y Birati; Guilherme H Oliveira; Francis D Pagani; James K Kirklin; David Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; David DeNofrio
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  Rates and types of infections in left ventricular assist device recipients: A scoping review.

Authors:  Michael Pienta; Supriya Shore; Francis D Pagani; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-08-12

7.  Impact of tricuspid valve insufficiency on the performance of left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Claudio J R Gomez Hamacher; Carolin Torregroza; Najla Sadat; Daniel Scheiber; Jil-Cathrin von der Beek; Ralf Westenfeld; Ivonne Jeanette Knorr; Martin Sager; Artur Lichtenberg; Diyar Saeed
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-09-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.