| Literature DB >> 25199951 |
Shahid Niaz Khan1, Asif Khan, Sanaullah Khan, Sultan Ayaz, Sobia Attaullah, Jabbar Khan, Muhammad Asim Khan, Ijaz Ali, Abdul Haleem Shah.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasmodium vivax is one of the widespread human malarial parasites accounting for 75% of malaria epidemics. However, there is no baseline information about the status and nature of genetic variation of Plasmodium species circulating in various parts of Pakistan. The present study was aimed at observing the molecular epidemiology and genetic variation of Plasmodium vivax by analysing its merozoite surface protein-3α (msp-3α) and merozoite surface protein-3β (msp-3β) genes, by using suballele, species-specific, combined nested PCR/RFLP detection techniques.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25199951 PMCID: PMC4164714 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1Overall prevalence of vivax malaria in Pakistan by PCR.
Figure 2PCR/RFLP analysis of gene. V shows P. vivax (the amplified product is 120 bp). A, B, C and D indicate the main allele variants, while A, B, C and D with numbers indicate subtypes of the main allele variants. M is a 50 base pairs DNA marker and m is a 1 kilo base pairs DNA marker.
Size, RFLP pattern and allelic frequency of - gene
| Size variation | RFLP by | Alleles | Data analysis n (%) frequency distribution of sub-allelic variants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Punjab | Sindh | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Balochistan | Total | |||
| (n = 32) | (n = 27) | (n = 41) | (n = 30) | (n = 130) | |||
| A | A1—A12 | 1 | 2 (6.25) | 2 (7.40) | 2 (4.87) | 2 (6.66) | 8 (6.15) |
| 2 | 2 (6.25) | 1 (3.70) | 2 (4.87) | 1 (3.33) | 6 (4.61) | ||
| 3 | 3 (9.37) | 2 (7.40) | 4 (9.75) | 2 (6.66) | 11 (8.46) | ||
| 4 | 2 (6.25) | 1 (3.70) | 2 (4.87) | 1 (3.33) | 6 (4.61) | ||
| 5 | 1 (3.12) | 1 (3.70) | 1 (2.43) | 1 (3.33) | 4 (3.07) | ||
| 6 | 2 (6.25) | 1 (3.70) | 1 (2.43) | 1 (3.33) | 4 (3.07) | ||
| 7 | 0 (0.00) | 1 (3.70) | 1 (2.43) | 1 (3.33) | 3 (2.30) | ||
| 8 | 1 (3.12) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.43) | 1 (3.33) | 3 (2.30) | ||
| 9 | 3 (9.37) | 3 (11.11) | 4 (9.75) | 3 (10) | 13 (10) | ||
| 10 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.43) | 1 (3.33) | 2 (1.53) | ||
| 11 | 2 (6.25) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.43) | 1 (3.33) | 3 (2.30) | ||
| 12 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.43) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.76) | ||
| B | B1—B5 | 13 | 3 (9.37) | 3 (11.11) | 3 (7.31) | 2 (6.66) | 11 (8.46) |
| 14 | 2 (6.25) | 3 (11.11) | 3 (7.31) | 3 (10) | 11(8.46) | ||
| 15 | 1 (3.12) | 1 (3.70) | 1 (2.43) | 1 (3.33) | 4 (3.07) | ||
| 16 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.43) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.76) | ||
| 17 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | ||
| C | C1—C4 | 18 | 2 (6.25) | 1 (3.70) | 2 (4.87) | 1 (3.33) | 6 (4.61) |
| 19 | 4 (12.5) | 3 (11.11) | 4 (9.75) | 4 (13.33) | 15 (11.53) | ||
| 20 | 2 (6.25) | 1 (3.70) | 2 (4.87) | 1 (3.33) | 6 (4.61) | ||
| 21 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | ||
| D | D1 | 22 | 2 (6.25) | 2 (7.40) | 3 (7.31) | 2 (6.66) | 9 (6.92) |
| M | M1 | 23 | 0 (0.00) | 1 (3.70) | 1 (2.43) | 1 (3.33) | 3 (2.30) |
| Total frequency (%) | 32 (24.61) | 27 (20.76) | 41 (31.53) | 30 (23.07) | 130 (64.35) | ||
| Mean ± SE | 1.48 ± 0.80 | 1.30 ± 0.96 | 1.17 ± 0.92 | 1.78 ± 0.79 | |||
| Kruskal wallis test | p < 0.05 | ||||||
n = The number of subtypes of alleles that bear Alu1 RFLP pattern.
Figure 3PCR/RFLP analysis of gene. A, B and C indicate the main allele variants, while A, B and C with numbers indicate subtypes of the main allele variants. m is a 1 kilo base pairs DNA marker.
Size, RFLP pattern and allelic frequency of gene
| Size variation | RFLP by | Alleles | Data analysis n (%) frequency distribution of sub-allelic variants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Punjab | Sindh | Khyber Pakhtunkhwa | Balochistan | Total | |||
| (n = 21) | (n = 20) | (n = 17) | (n = 14) | (n = 72) | |||
| A | A1—A7 | A1 | 1(4.76) | 1 (5) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (7.14) | 3 (4.16) |
| A2 | 1(4.76) | 1 (5) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (2.77) | ||
| A3 | 1(4.76) | 1 (5) | 1 (5.88) | 0 (0.00) | 3 (4.16) | ||
| A4 | 1(4.76) | 2 (10) | 1 (5.88) | 1 (7.14) | 5 (6.94) | ||
| A5 | 1(4.76) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (5.88) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (2.77) | ||
| A6 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (5.88) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (1.38) | ||
| A7 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| B | B1—B10 | B1 | 1(4.76) | 1 (5) | 1 (5.88) | 1 (7.14) | 4 (5.55) |
| B2 | 2 (9.52) | 2 (10) | 2 (11.76) | 2 (14.28) | 8 (11.11) | ||
| B3 | 2 (9.52) | 2 (10) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (7.14) | 5 (6.94) | ||
| B4 | 1(4.76) | 1 (5) | 1 (5.88) | 0 (0.00) | 3 (4.16) | ||
| B5 | 1(4.76) | 1 (5) | 1 (5.88) | 1 (7.14) | 4 (5.55) | ||
| B6 | 2 (9.52) | 3 (15) | 2 (11.76) | 0 (0.00) | 7 (9.72) | ||
| B7 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (7.14) | 1 (1.38) | ||
| B8 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| B9 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| B10 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| C | C1—C4 | C1 | 2 (9.52) | 2 (10) | 2 (11.76) | 1 (7.14) | 7 (9.72) |
| C2 | 2 (9.52) | 1 (5) | 1 (5.88) | 1 (7.14) | 5 (6.94) | ||
| C3 | 1(4.76) | 1 (5) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (7.14) | 3 (4.16) | ||
| C4 | 2 (9.52) | 1 (5) | 1 (5.88) | 1 (7.14) | 5 (6.94) | ||
| C5 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (5.88) | 1 (7.14) | 2 (2.77) | ||
| C6 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| M | M1 | M1 | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (5.88) | 1 (7.14) | 2 (2.77) |
| Total frequency (%) | 21 (29.16) | 20 (27.77) | 17 (23.61) | 14 (19.44) | 72 (35.64) | ||
| Mean ± SE | 1.11 ± 0.17 | 1.05 ± 0.19 | 0.89 ± 0.15 | 0.74 ± 0.13 | |||
| Kruskal wallis test | p < 0.05 | ||||||
n = The number of subtypes of alleles that bear Pst1 RFLP pattern.