Literature DB >> 25197435

Genome sequence of the chromate-resistant bacterium Leucobacter salsicius type strain M1-8(T.).

Ji-Hyun Yun1, Yong-Joon Cho2, Jongsik Chun2, Dong-Wook Hyun1, Jin-Woo Bae1.   

Abstract

Leucobacter salsicius M1-8(T) is a member of the Microbacteriaceae family within the class Actinomycetales. This strain is a Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacterium and was previously isolated from a Korean fermented food. Most members of the genus Leucobacter are chromate-resistant and this feature could be exploited in biotechnological applications. However, the genus Leucobacter is poorly characterized at the genome level, despite its potential importance. Thus, the present study determined the features of Leucobacter salsicius M1-8(T), as well as its genome sequence and annotation. The genome comprised 3,185,418 bp with a G+C content of 64.5%, which included 2,865 protein-coding genes and 68 RNA genes. This strain possessed two predicted genes associated with chromate resistance, which might facilitate its growth in heavy metal-rich environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leucobacter salsicius; Microbacteriaceae; chromate resistance

Year:  2013        PMID: 25197435      PMCID: PMC4148977          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.4708537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

The strain M1-8T (= KACC 21127T = JCM 16362T) is the type strain of the species [1], which was isolated from a Korean salt-fermented seafood known as “jeotgal” in Korean. The species epithet was derived from the Latin word salsicius, which means salty [1]. The genus was proposed in 1996 [2] and comprises a group of related Gram-positive, aerobic, non-motile, rod-shaped bacteria. strains have been recovered from a variety of ecological niches, including activated sludge from soil [3], wastewater [4-6], river sediments containing chromium [5], nematodes [7,8], food [1,9], potato plant phyllosphere [10], chironomid egg masses [11], air [12], soil [13], and feces [14]. Several strains have been reported to possess chromate resistance [1,4,11]. At present, there are 18 validly named species, but the only sequenced genomes in this genus were sp. UCD-THU [15] and [16]. Among them, the highest resistance to chromate (up to 300 mM K2CrO4) was observed in , in vivo [13]. However, no information has been generated on genes related to the mechanism of chromate resistance . strain M1-8T has lower chromate resistance than but it still exhibits moderate resistance (up to 10.0 mM Cr(VI)). Thus, the genomic analysis of M1-8T should help us to understand the molecular basis of adaptation to a chromium-contaminated environment. The present study determined the classification and features of strain M1-8T, as well as its genome sequence and gene annotations.

Classification and features

16S rRNA analysis

A representative genomic 16S rRNA gene of strain M1-8T was compared with those obtained using NCBI BLAST [17] with the default settings (only highly similar sequences). The most frequently occurring genera were (65.0%), unidentified bacteria (20.0%), (6.0%), (5.0%), (2.0%), (1.0%), and (1.0%) (100 hits in total). The species with the Max score was (AB514037), which had a shared identity of 99.0%. The multiple sequence alignment program CLUSTALW [18] was used to align the 16S rRNA gene sequences from M1-8T and related taxa. Phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the aligned gene sequences using the maximum-likelihood, maximum-parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods based on 1,000 randomly selected bootstrap replicates using MEGA version 5 [19]. Strain M1-8T shared 99.1% nucleotide sequence similarity with Sj10T, the closest validated species according to the phylogeny (Figure 1). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic position of in the 16S rRNA-based tree. The sequence of the single 16S rRNA gene copy found in the genome did not differ from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (GQ352403).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree showing the position of relative to the type strains of other species within the genus , using AHU1791T as the outgroup. The sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW [18] and the phylogenetic tree was inferred from 1,390 aligned characteristics of the 16S rRNA gene sequence using the maximum-likelihood (ML) algorithm [20] with MEGA5 [19]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. The numbers adjacent to the branches are the support values based on 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates [20] (left), 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [21] (middle), and 1,000 neighbor-joining bootstrap replicates [22] (right), for values >50%.

Phylogenetic tree showing the position of relative to the type strains of other species within the genus , using AHU1791T as the outgroup. The sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW [18] and the phylogenetic tree was inferred from 1,390 aligned characteristics of the 16S rRNA gene sequence using the maximum-likelihood (ML) algorithm [20] with MEGA5 [19]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. The numbers adjacent to the branches are the support values based on 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates [20] (left), 1,000 maximum-parsimony bootstrap replicates [21] (middle), and 1,000 neighbor-joining bootstrap replicates [22] (right), for values >50%.

Morphology and physiology

Strain M1-8T is classified as class , order , family , genus (Table 1) [1]. The strain M1-8T was isolated from a Korean salt-fermented food that contains tiny shrimp (shrimp jeotgal). The cells of strain M1-8T were rod-shaped, 1.0–1.5 μm in length, and 0.4–0.5 μm in diameter (Figure 2). No flagella were observed. The colonies were cream in color and circular with entire margins on marine agar medium. Strain M1-8T was aerobic and Gram-positive (Table 1). Optimum growth was observed at 25–30°C, at pH 7.0–8.0, and in the presence of 0–4% (w/v) NaCl. The tolerance of Cr (VI) was observed at up to 10.0 mM K2CrO4. The physiological characteristics, such as the growth substrates of M1-8T, were described in detail in a previous study [1].
Table 1

Classification and general features of M1-8T according to the Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence (MIGS) recommendations [23]

MIGS ID    Property    Term    Evidence codea
    Current classification    Domain Bacteria    TAS [24]
    Phylum Actinobacteria    TAS [25]
    Class Actinobacteria    TAS [26]
    Order Actinomycetales    TAS [26-29]
    Family Microbacteriaceae    TAS [26,27,30,31]
    Genus Leucobacter    TAS [2]
    Species Leucobacter salsicius    TAS [1]
    Type strain M1-8T    TAS [1]
    Gram stain    Positive    TAS [1]
    Cell shape    Rod-shaped    TAS [1]
    Motility    Non-motile    TAS [1]
    Sporulation    Not reported
    Temperature range    Mesophile    TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature    25–30°C    TAS [1]
    pH    pH 7–8    TAS [1]
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement    Aerobic    TAS [1]
    Carbon source    Heterotroph    TAS [1]
    Energy metabolism    Not reported
MIGS-6    Habitat    Fermented food    TAS [1]
MIGS-6.3    Salinity    Halotolerant    TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship    Free-living    NAS
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity    Not reported    NAS
    Isolation    Fermented food (Shrimp jeotgal, a Korean salt-fermented food)    TAS [1]
MIGS-4    Geographic location    South Korea    TAS [1]
MIGS-5      Sample collection date    May 2009    NAS
MIGS-4.1    Latitude    Not reported
MIGS-4.1    Longitude    Not reported
MIGS-4.3    Depth    Not reported
MIGS-4.4    Altitude   Not reported

The evidence codes are as follows. TAS: traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature). NAS: non-traceable author statement (i.e., not observed directly in a living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property of the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are derived from the Gene Ontology project [32].

Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of M1-8T, which was obtained using a SUPRA VP55 (Carl Zeiss) at an operating voltage of 15 kV. The scale bar represents 1 μm.

The evidence codes are as follows. TAS: traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature). NAS: non-traceable author statement (i.e., not observed directly in a living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property of the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are derived from the Gene Ontology project [32]. Scanning electron micrograph of M1-8T, which was obtained using a SUPRA VP55 (Carl Zeiss) at an operating voltage of 15 kV. The scale bar represents 1 μm.

Chemotaxonomy

The peptidoglycan hydrolysate from strain M1-8T contained alanine, 2,4-diaminobutyric acid (DAB), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamic acid, and glycine. The predominant fatty acids (>10% of the total) in M1-8T were anteiso-C15:0 (63.6%), anteiso- C17:0 (16.7%), and iso-C16:0 (14.2%). The polar lipid profile of strain M1-8T contained diphosphatidylglycerol and an unknown glycolipid. The major menaquinone in M1-8T was MK-11 and the minor menaquinones were MK-10 and MK-7.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

strain M1-8T was selected for genome sequencing based on its environmental potential and is part of the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No.PJ008208). The genome sequence was deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession number AOCN00000000 and the genome project was deposited in the Genomes On Line Database [33] under Gi21829. The sequencing and annotation were performed by ChunLab Inc., South Korea. A summary of the project information and the associations with “Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence” (MIGS) [34] are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID     Property    Term
MIGS-31     Finishing quality    Improved high-quality draft
MIGS-28     Libraries used    454 PE library (8 kb insert size), Illumina PE library (150 bp)
MIGS-28.2     Number of reads    4,157,212 sequencing reads
MIGS-29     Sequencing platforms    PacBio RS, Illumina GAii, 454-GS-FLX-Titanium
MIGS-31.2     Sequencing coverage    189.78 × Illumina; 7.96 × pyrosequence;    15.88 × PacBio
MIGS-30     Assemblers    Roche gsAssembler version 2.6,    CLCbio CLC Genomics Workbench version 5.0
MIGS-32     Gene-calling method    Prodigal 2.5
     INSDC ID    AOCN01000000
     GenBank Date of     Release    April 3, 2013
     GOLD ID    Gi21829
     NCBI project ID    175945
     Database: IMG    2526164546
MIGS-13     Source material identifier    KACC 21127T, JCM 16362T
     Project relevance    Environmental and biotechnological

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

strain M1-8T was cultured aerobically in marine agar medium at 30°C. Genomic DNA was extracted using a G-spin DNA extraction kit (iNtRON Biotechnology), according to the standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of an Illumina Hiseq system with a 150 base pair (bp) paired-end library, a 454 Genome Sequencer FLX Titanium system (Roche) with an 8 kb paired-end library, and a PacBio RS system (Pacific Biosciences). The Illumina reads were assembled using CLC Genomics Workbench ver. 5.0. The initial assembly was converted for the CLC Genomics Workbench by constructing fake reads from the consensus to collect the read pairs in the Illumina paired-end library. The 454 paired-end reads were assembled with Illumina data using gsAssembler ver. 2.6 (Roche) and the PacBio sequences were clustered into overlapping assembled data. CodonCode Aligner and CLC Genomics Workbench 5.0 were used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. The Illumina (189.78-fold coverage; 4,003,590 reads), PacBio (88-fold coverage; 23,441 reads), and 454 sequencing (7.96-fold coverage; 130,181 reads) platforms provided 213.62 × coverage (total 4,157,212 sequencing reads) of the genome. The final assembly identified one scaffold that included 28 contigs.

Genome annotation

The genes in the assembled genome were predicted using Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform as part of the DOE-JGI genome annotation pipeline [35], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline. Comparisons of the predicted ORFs using the SEED [36], NCBI COG [37], Ez-Taxon-e [38], and Pfam [39] databases were conducted during gene annotation. Additional gene prediction analyses and functional annotation were performed with the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) server databases [40] and the gene-caller GLIMMER 3.02. RNAmer 1.2 [41] and tRNAscan-SE 1.23 [42] were used to identify rRNA genes and tRNA genes, respectively. The CLgenomicsTM 1.06 (ChunLab) was used to visualize the genomic features.

Genome properties

The genome comprised a circular chromosome with a length of 3,185,418 bp and a G+C content of 64.5% (Figure 3 and Table 3). Of the 2,933 predicted genes, 2,865 were protein-coding genes and 68 were RNA genes (three 5S rRNA genes, three 16S rRNA genes, three 23S rRNA genes, 51 predicted tRNA genes, and eight miscRNA genes). The majority of the protein-coding genes (2,275 genes; 77.6%) was assigned putative functions, while the remainder was annotated as hypothetical proteins (182 genes). The genome properties and statistics are summarized in Table 3. The distributions of genes among the COGs functional categories are shown in Table 4.
Figure 3

Graphical map of the largest scaffold. From the outside to the center: genes on the reverse strand (colored according to the COGs categories), genes on the forward strand (colored according to the COGs categories), and RNA genes (tRNAs in red and rRNAs in blue). The inner circle shows the GC skew, where yellow indicates positive values and blue indicates negative values. The GC ratio is shown in red/green, which indicates positive/negative, respectively.

Table 3

Genome statistics

Attribute   Value    % of totala
Genome size (bp)   3,185,418    100
DNA coding region (bp)   2,905,046    91.20
DNA G+C content (bp)   2,054,445    64.5
Total genes   2,933    100
RNA genes   68    2.32
rRNA operons   3    0.31
Protein-coding genes   2,865    97.68
Genes with predicted functions   2,275    77.57
Genes in paralog clusters   2,357    80.36
Genes assigned to COGs   2,210    75.35
Genes assigned Pfam domains   2331    79.47
Genes with signal peptides   195    6.65
Genes with transmembrane helices   784    26.73

aThe totals are based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein-coding genes in the annotated genome.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COGs functional categories

Code   Value    % agea    Description
J   156    6.38    Translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis
A   4    0.16    RNA processing and modification
K   218    8.91    Transcription
L   167    6.83    Replication, recombination, and repair
B   1    0.04    Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   21    0.86    Cell cycle control, cell division, and chromosome partitioning
Y   0    0.00    Nuclear structure
V   40    1.64    Defense mechanisms
T   100    4.09    Signal transduction mechanisms
M   112    4.58    Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N   0    0.00    Cell motility
Z   1    0.04    Cytoskeleton
W   0    0.00    Extracellular structures
U   32    1.31    Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O   69    2.82    Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones
C   131    5.36    Energy production and conversion
G   129    5.27    Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   315    12.88    Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   74    3.03    Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   101    4.13    Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   81    3.31    Lipid transport and metabolism
P   154    6.30    Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   51    2.09    Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism
R   307    12.55    General function prediction only
S   182    7.42    Function unknown
-   723    24.65    Not in COGs

aThe total is based on the total number of protein-coding genes in the annotated genome.

Graphical map of the largest scaffold. From the outside to the center: genes on the reverse strand (colored according to the COGs categories), genes on the forward strand (colored according to the COGs categories), and RNA genes (tRNAs in red and rRNAs in blue). The inner circle shows the GC skew, where yellow indicates positive values and blue indicates negative values. The GC ratio is shown in red/green, which indicates positive/negative, respectively. aThe totals are based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein-coding genes in the annotated genome. aThe total is based on the total number of protein-coding genes in the annotated genome.

Insights from the genome sequence

M1-8T and members, such as , , , and , have been shown to possess chromate resistance in previous studies, while Zhu et al. reported the reduction of chromate by sp. [43]. In the present study, the genome analysis of M1-8T detected two copies of chromate transport protein A (ChrA), which is a membrane protein that confers heavy metal tolerance via chromate ion efflux from the cytoplasm. Potentially, this gene is a key feature that allows to adapt to chromate-contaminated environments. The genome sequence of M1-8T should provide deeper insights into the molecular mechanisms that underlie chromium tolerance and it may facilitate the development of biotechnological applications to improve chromium-contaminated field sites.
  36 in total

1.  Leucobacter chromiireducens sp. nov, and Leucobacter aridicollis sp. nov., two new species isolated from a chromium contaminated environment.

Authors:  Paula V Morais; Romeu Francisco; Rita Branco; Ana Paula Chung; Milton S da Costa
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Leucobacter salsicius sp. nov., from a salt-fermented food.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Yun; Seong Woon Roh; Min-Soo Kim; Mi-Ja Jung; Eun-Jin Park; Kee-Sun Shin; Young-Do Nam; Jin-Woo Bae
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Leucobacter kyeonggiensis sp. nov., a new species isolated from dye waste water.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung Kim; Sang-Seob Lee
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.422

6.  Leucobacter luti sp. nov., and Leucobacter alluvii sp. nov., two new species of the genus Leucobacter isolated under chromium stress.

Authors:  Paula V Morais; Cristiana Paulo; Romeu Francisco; Rita Branco; Ana Paula Chung; Milton S da Costa
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  Zimmermannella helvola gen. nov., sp. nov., Zimmermannella alba sp. nov., Zimmermannella bifida sp. nov., Zimmermannella faecalis sp. nov. and Leucobacter albus sp. nov., novel members of the family Microbacteriaceae.

Authors:  Yi-Chueh Lin; Kazunori Uemori; Dominique A de Briel; Vallapa Arunpairojana; Akira Yokota
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Robert D Finn; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Penny Coggill; Andreas Heger; Joanne E Pollington; O Luke Gavin; Prasad Gunasekaran; Goran Ceric; Kristoffer Forslund; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Leucobacter chironomi sp. nov., a chromate-resistant bacterium isolated from a chironomid egg mass.

Authors:  Malka Halpern; Tamar Shakéd; Rüdiger Pukall; Peter Schumann
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Authors:  Konstantinos Liolios; I-Min A Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Nektarios Tavernarakis; Philip Hugenholtz; Victor M Markowitz; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Leucobacter coleopterorum sp. nov., Leucobacter insecticola sp. nov., and Leucobacter viscericola sp. nov., isolated from the intestine of the diving beetles, Cybister brevis and Cybister lewisianus, and emended description of the genus Leucobacter.

Authors:  Dong-Wook Hyun; Hojun Sung; Pil Soo Kim; Ji-Hyun Yun; Jin-Woo Bae
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  [Characterization of chromate resistance in genetically engineered Escherichia coli expressing chromate ion transporter ChrA].

Authors:  Si-Min Zhou; Lan-Lan Dong; Yuan He; Hong Xiao
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-10-20

3.  High quality draft genome sequence of Leucobacter chironomi strain MM2LB(T) (DSM 19883(T)) isolated from a Chironomus sp. egg mass.

Authors:  Sivan Laviad; Alla Lapidus; Alex Copeland; Tbk Reddy; Marcel Huntemann; Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Victor M Markowitz; Rüdiger Pukall; Hans-Peter Klenk; Tanja Woyke; Nikos C Kyrpides; Malka Halpern
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2015-05-08

4.  High-Quality Draft Genome Sequence of Leucobacter sp. Strain G161, a Distinct and Effective Chromium Reducer.

Authors:  Shimei Ge; Wenjing Ai; Xinjiao Dong
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-02-18

5.  Genome sequence of "Leucobacter massiliensis" sp. nov. isolated from human pharynx after travel to the 2014 Hajj.

Authors:  T Leangapichart; P Gautret; T T Nguyen; N Armstrong; J-M Rolain
Journal:  New Microbes New Infect       Date:  2017-10-26

6.  Comparative genomics reveals a novel genetic organization of the sad cluster in the sulfonamide-degrader 'Candidatus Leucobacter sulfamidivorax' strain GP.

Authors:  Ana C Reis; Boris A Kolvenbach; Mohamed Chami; Luís Gales; Conceição Egas; Philippe F-X Corvini; Olga C Nunes
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.969

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.