Chad R Ritch1, Amy J Graves2, Kirk A Keegan3, Shenghua Ni4, Jeffrey C Bassett2, Sam S Chang5, Matthew J Resnick2, David F Penson2, Daniel A Barocas2. 1. Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida. Electronic address: ritch.chad@gmail.com. 2. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 3. Division of Urology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas. 4. Center for Surgical Quality and Outcomes Research, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Department of Urologic Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There are growing concerns regarding the overtreatment of localized prostate cancer. It is also relatively unknown whether there has been increased uptake of observational strategies for disease management. We assessed the temporal trend in observation of clinically localized prostate cancer, particularly in men with low risk disease, who were young and healthy enough to undergo treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the SEER-Medicare database in 66,499 men with localized prostate cancer between 2004 and 2009. The main study outcome was observation within 1 year after diagnosis. We performed multivariable analysis to develop a predictive model of observation adjusting for diagnosis year, age, risk and comorbidity. RESULTS: Observation was performed in 12,007 men (18%) with a slight increase with time from 17% to 20%. However, there was marked increase in observation from 18% in 2004 to 29% in 2009 in men with low risk disease. Men 66 to 69 years old with low risk disease and no comorbidities had twice the odds of undergoing observation in 2009 vs 2004 (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.73-2.59). Age, risk group, comorbidity and race were independent predictors of observation (each p <0.001), in addition to diagnosis year. CONCLUSIONS: We identified increasing use of observation for low risk prostate cancer between 2004 and 2009 even in men young and healthy enough for treatment. This suggests growing acceptance of surveillance in this group of patients.
PURPOSE: There are growing concerns regarding the overtreatment of localized prostate cancer. It is also relatively unknown whether there has been increased uptake of observational strategies for disease management. We assessed the temporal trend in observation of clinically localized prostate cancer, particularly in men with low risk disease, who were young and healthy enough to undergo treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the SEER-Medicare database in 66,499 men with localized prostate cancer between 2004 and 2009. The main study outcome was observation within 1 year after diagnosis. We performed multivariable analysis to develop a predictive model of observation adjusting for diagnosis year, age, risk and comorbidity. RESULTS: Observation was performed in 12,007 men (18%) with a slight increase with time from 17% to 20%. However, there was marked increase in observation from 18% in 2004 to 29% in 2009 in men with low risk disease. Men 66 to 69 years old with low risk disease and no comorbidities had twice the odds of undergoing observation in 2009 vs 2004 (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.73-2.59). Age, risk group, comorbidity and race were independent predictors of observation (each p <0.001), in addition to diagnosis year. CONCLUSIONS: We identified increasing use of observation for low risk prostate cancer between 2004 and 2009 even in men young and healthy enough for treatment. This suggests growing acceptance of surveillance in this group of patients.
Authors: Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Grace L Lu-Yao; Peter C Albertsen; Dirk F Moore; Weichung Shih; Yong Lin; Robert S DiPaola; Michael J Barry; Anthony Zietman; Michael O'Leary; Elizabeth Walker-Corkery; Siu-Long Yao Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; K Blank; G A Broderick; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; I Kaplan; C J Beard; A Wein Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-09-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Susan R Harlan; Matthew R Cooperberg; Eric P Elkin; Deborah P Lubeck; Maxwell V Meng; Shilpa S Mehta; Peter R Carroll Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Richard M Hoffman; Linda C Harlan; Carrie N Klabunde; Frank D Gilliland; Robert A Stephenson; William C Hunt; Arnold L Potosky Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Matthew R Cooperberg; Deborah P Lubeck; Maxwell V Meng; Shilpa S Mehta; Peter R Carroll Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J B Eifler; J Alvarez; T Koyama; R M Conwill; C R Ritch; K E Hoffman; M J Resnick; D F Penson; D A Barocas Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ronald E Myers; Amy E Leader; Jean Hoffman Censits; Edouard J Trabulsi; Scott W Keith; Anett M Petrich; Anna M Quinn; Robert B Den; Mark D Hurwitz; Costas D Lallas; Sarah E Hegarty; Adam P Dicker; Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson; Veda N Giri; Hasan Ayaz; Leonard G Gomella Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Richard M Hoffman; Tania Lobo; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Amethyst D Leimpeter; David Aaronson; David F Penson; Kathryn Taylor Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Parth K Modi; Samuel R Kaufman; Tudor Borza; Phyllis Yan; David C Miller; Ted A Skolarus; John M Hollingsworth; Edward C Norton; Vahakn B Shahinian; Brent K Hollenbeck Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Maximilian F Lang; Mark D Tyson; JoAnn Rudd Alvarez; Tatsuki Koyama; Karen E Hoffman; Matthew J Resnick; Matthew R Cooperberg; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Vivien Chen; Lisa E Paddock; Ann S Hamilton; Mia Hashibe; Michael Goodman; Sheldon Greenfield; Sherrie H Kaplan; Antoinette Stroup; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas Journal: Urology Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Kathryn L Taylor; Richard M Hoffman; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Amethyst Leimpeter; Tania Lobo; Scott P Kelly; Jun Shan; David Aaronson; Catherine A Tomko; Amy J Starosta; Charlotte J Hagerman; Stephen K Van Den Eeden Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Richard M Hoffman; Sarah L Mott; Bradley D McDowell; Sonia T Anand; Kenneth G Nepple Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 5.455