B L Wise1, L Kritikos2, J A Lynch3, F Liu3, N Parimi4, K L Tileston5, M C Nevitt3, N E Lane2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA. Electronic address: barton.wise@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. San Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA. 5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association of proximal femur shape with ipsilateral medial and lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Radiographs were obtained from the NIH-funded Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Cases of isolated radiographic lateral compartment knee OA were defined on baseline radiographs as Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) Grade ≥ 2 and joint space narrowing (JSN) > 0 in the lateral compartment and JSN = 0 in the medial compartment; isolated medial compartment knee OA had K/L ≥ 2 and JSN > 0 medially with JSN = 0 in the lateral compartment. Controls had K/L < 2 and JSN = 0 in both compartments. Controls were frequency matched to cases by sex and 10-year age intervals. We characterized the shape of the proximal femurs on radiographs using Active Shape Modeling (ASM) and determined the association of proximal femur shape with knee OA using logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 168 lateral compartment knee OA cases (mean body mass index (BMI) 29.72 ± 5.26), 169 medial compartment knee OA cases (mean BMI 29.68 ± 4.83) and 168 controls (mean BMI 26.87 ± 4.2). Thirteen modes were derived for femur shape which described 95.5% of the total variance in proximal femur shape in the population. Modes 6, 8 and 12 were associated with prevalent lateral compartment knee OA. Medial compartment knee OA was associated with proximal femur modes 1, 5, 8, and 12. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalent lateral and medial compartment knee OA are associated with different ipsilateral proximal femur shapes. Additional studies are needed to better define how the shape of the proximal femur influences compartment-specific knee OA.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association of proximal femur shape with ipsilateral medial and lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). DESIGN: Radiographs were obtained from the NIH-funded Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Cases of isolated radiographic lateral compartment knee OA were defined on baseline radiographs as Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) Grade ≥ 2 and joint space narrowing (JSN) > 0 in the lateral compartment and JSN = 0 in the medial compartment; isolated medial compartment knee OA had K/L ≥ 2 and JSN > 0 medially with JSN = 0 in the lateral compartment. Controls had K/L < 2 and JSN = 0 in both compartments. Controls were frequency matched to cases by sex and 10-year age intervals. We characterized the shape of the proximal femurs on radiographs using Active Shape Modeling (ASM) and determined the association of proximal femur shape with knee OA using logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 168 lateral compartment knee OA cases (mean body mass index (BMI) 29.72 ± 5.26), 169 medial compartment knee OA cases (mean BMI 29.68 ± 4.83) and 168 controls (mean BMI 26.87 ± 4.2). Thirteen modes were derived for femur shape which described 95.5% of the total variance in proximal femur shape in the population. Modes 6, 8 and 12 were associated with prevalent lateral compartment knee OA. Medial compartment knee OA was associated with proximal femur modes 1, 5, 8, and 12. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalent lateral and medial compartment knee OA are associated with different ipsilateral proximal femur shapes. Additional studies are needed to better define how the shape of the proximal femur influences compartment-specific knee OA.
Authors: Eric C Sayre; Joanne M Jordan; Jolanda Cibere; Louise Murphy; Todd A Schwartz; Charles G Helmick; Jordan B Renner; M Mushfiqur Rahman; Jaafar Aghajanian; Weiqun Kang; Elizabeth M Badley; Jacek A Kopec Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Todd L Bredbenner; Travis D Eliason; Ryan S Potter; Robert L Mason; Lorena M Havill; Daniel P Nicolella Journal: J Biomech Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Reva C Lawrence; David T Felson; Charles G Helmick; Lesley M Arnold; Hyon Choi; Richard A Deyo; Sherine Gabriel; Rosemarie Hirsch; Marc C Hochberg; Gene G Hunder; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffrey N Katz; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Frederick Wolfe Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-01
Authors: Jennifer S Gregory; Jan H Waarsing; Judd Day; Huibert A Pols; Max Reijman; Harrie Weinans; Richard M Aspden Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2007-11
Authors: Valentina Pedoia; Michael A Samaan; Gaurav Inamdar; Matthew C Gallo; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Barton L Wise; Felix Liu; Lisa Kritikos; John A Lynch; Neeta Parimi; Yuqing Zhang; Nancy E Lane Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Gaurav Inamdar; Valentina Pedoia; Jasmine Rossi-Devries; Michael A Samaan; Thomas M Link; Richard B Souza; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2018-10-16 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Amanda E Nelson; Yvonne M Golightly; Jordan B Renner; Todd A Schwartz; Felix Liu; John A Lynch; Jenny S Gregory; Richard M Aspden; Nancy E Lane; Joanne M Jordan Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Barton L Wise; Jingbo Niu; Yuqing Zhang; Felix Liu; Joyce Pang; John A Lynch; Nancy E Lane Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Anastasia V Pavlova; Fiona R Saunders; Stella G Muthuri; Jennifer S Gregory; Rebecca J Barr; Kathryn R Martin; Rebecca J Hardy; Rachel Cooper; Judith E Adams; Diana Kuh; Richard M Aspden Journal: J Anat Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 2.610