Literature DB >> 25193568

Comparison of hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Bin Li1, Jia-Shi Wang1, Ming He1, Guang-Bin Wang1, Peng Shen1, Lun-Hao Bai2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes between hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients undergoing isolated single-bundle PCL reconstruction were enrolled in this study, and their data were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into group A [4-strand hamstring tendon autograft (4SHG), n = 18] and group B [2-strand tibialis anterior allograft (2STAG), n = 19] and followed up for 2 years at least. Several parameters including the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity rating and knee laxity arthrometer were evaluated, and physical examination was performed preoperatively and postoperatively, and postoperative complications were also observed in all patients. Meanwhile, the postoperative posterior instability was compared between the affected knee and the contra-lateral knee.
RESULTS: Compared with preoperative knee laxity and function, both groups had significant improvement postoperatively (P < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences in knee laxity and function between both groups (n.s.). Compared with contra-lateral knee, the posterior stability was worse in the affected knee (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes were similar between 4SHG or 2STAG in PCL reconstruction. Compared with contra-lateral knees, the affected knees have slight residual knee laxity in both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy; Hamstring tendon autograft; Posterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction; Tibialis anterior allograft

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25193568     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3267-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  37 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  C D Harner; M A Janaushek; A Kanamori; M Yagi; T M Vogrin; S L Woo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Evaluation of transtibial double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a single-sling method with a tibialis anterior allograft.

Authors:  Byoung-Hyun Min; Yong Seuk Lee; Yu Sang Lee; Cheng Zhe Jin; Kwang-Hyun Son
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Retrospective review of 4- versus 7-strand hamstring tendon graft.

Authors:  Jinzhong Zhao; Xiaqiao Huangfu
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Strategies to enhance tendon graft--bone healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Chih-Hwa Chen
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

5.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

6.  The human posterior cruciate ligament complex: an interdisciplinary study. Ligament morphology and biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  C D Harner; J W Xerogeanes; G A Livesay; G J Carlin; B A Smith; T Kusayama; S Kashiwaguchi; S L Woo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective review of hamstring tendon graft versus LARS artificial ligament.

Authors:  Bin Li; Yu Wen; Haishan Wu; Qirong Qian; Yuli Wu; Xiangbo Lin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Long-term followup of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.

Authors:  M D Boynton; B R Tietjens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Evaluation of the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -a comparison between the use of the bone tendon bone and semitendinosus and gracilis tendons-.

Authors:  Yuichiro Maruyama; Katsuo Shitoto; Tomonori Baba; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2012-08-29

Review 10.  Intra-articular remodelling of hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Rob P A Janssen; Sven U Scheffler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  10 in total

1.  Inside-Out Antegrade Tibial Tunnel Drilling Through the Posterolateral Portal Using a Flexible Reamer in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Joseph J Stuart; J H James Choi; Alison P Toth; Claude T Moorman; Dean C Taylor
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-10-05

2.  Variance in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Selection based on Patient Demographics and Location within the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network Cohort.

Authors:  Darby A Houck; Matthew J Kraeutler; Armando F Vidal; Eric C McCarty; Jonathan T Bravman; Michelle L Wolcott
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  How to avoid collision between PCL and MCL femoral tunnels during a simultaneous reconstruction.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Emanuele Grassedonio; Michele Lauria; Massimo Midiri; Michele D'Arienzo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Arthroscopic Transtibial PCL Reconstruction: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Shin; Travis G Maak
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

5.  Posterolateral portal tibial tunnel drilling for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: technique and evaluation of safety and tunnel position.

Authors:  Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Joseph J Stuart; J H James Choi; Alison P Toth; Claude T Moorman; Dean C Taylor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Global variation in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Derrick M Knapik; Varun Gopinatth; Garrett R Jackson; Jorge Chahla; Matthew V Smith; Matthew J Matava; Robert H Brophy
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-10-09

Review 7.  Comparison of autograft and allograft tendons in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Tian; Wen-Qing Hu; Zhi-Jun Li; Xiao-Lei Sun; Xin-Long Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Isolated Posterior Cruciate Reconstruction Results in Improved Functional Outcome but Low Rates of Return to Preinjury Level of Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brian M Devitt; Ruchith Dissanayake; Joseph Clair; Richard J Napier; Tabitha J Porter; Julian A Feller; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-10-26

9.  Hamstring, bone-patellar tendon-bone, quadriceps and peroneus longus tendon autografts for primary isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Andrea Pintore; Gianluca Vecchio; Francesco Oliva; Frank Hildebrand; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 5.841

10.  Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) synthetic graft for PCL reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Andrea Pintore; Gianluca Vecchio; Francesco Oliva; Frank Hildebrand; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 5.841

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.