Literature DB >> 28701007

Variance in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Selection based on Patient Demographics and Location within the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network Cohort.

Darby A Houck1, Matthew J Kraeutler2, Armando F Vidal1, Eric C McCarty1, Jonathan T Bravman1, Michelle L Wolcott1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine whether any regional or age-related patterns exist in graft choice for patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) within a large multicenter consortium. A retrospective cohort study was performed using data collected from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) on patients having undergone primary ACLR. Patients were stratified by age group (younger than 20, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, and 50+ years) and four demographic regions (Midwest, Southeast, Northeast, and West). A total of 2,149 patients (1,288 males, 861 females) were included. At least 70% of the patients were treated by a single surgeon in three of the four demographic regions. There were no clinically significant differences in body mass index (BMI), and no statistically significant differences in Marx activity rating scale (p > 0.05) between regions within any particular age group. There were significant differences in the proportion of autografts versus allografts used for primary ACLR between regions in every age group (p < 0.01). There were also significant differences in autograft (p < 0.001) and allograft (p < 0.001) harvest location based on demographic region. The Southeast and Northeast were more likely to use bone-patellar-tendon-bone autograft while the West and Midwest were likely to use hamstring autograft. Within our consortium, regional patterns exist both in autograft versus allograft use in patients undergoing primary ACLR, as well as harvest location of autografts and allografts. Given the similarities in average patient BMI and activity level between regions, as well as the single surgeon influence in three of the four regions, the regional patterns in graft use are likely due to surgeon preference. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28701007      PMCID: PMC5780252          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  36 in total

Review 1.  Does the graft source really matter in the outcome of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? An evaluation of autograft versus allograft reconstruction results: a systematic review.

Authors:  Timothy E Foster; Brian L Wolfe; Scott Ryan; Lorenzo Silvestri; Elizabeth Krall Kaye
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Geographic variability of adherence to occupational injury treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Antonio J Trujillo; Sara E Heins; Gerard F Anderson; Renan C Castillo
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 40 years: allograft versus autograft patellar tendon.

Authors:  Gene Barrett; David Stokes; Miranda White
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Demographic trends in arthroscopic SLAP repair in the United States.

Authors:  Alan L Zhang; Christopher Kreulen; Stephanie S Ngo; Sharon L Hame; Jeffrey C Wang; Seth C Gamradt
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients.

Authors:  Matthew J Kraeutler; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Analysis of rotator cuff repair trends in a large private insurance population.

Authors:  Alan L Zhang; Scott R Montgomery; Stephanie S Ngo; Sharon L Hame; Jeffrey C Wang; Seth C Gamradt
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Peter N Chalmers; Mario Moric; Miho J Tanaka; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach; George A Paletta
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Increased incidence of osteoarthritis of knee joint after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts than hamstring autografts: a meta-analysis of 1,443 patients at a minimum of 5 years.

Authors:  Xiaobo Xie; Zhuo Xiao; Qi Li; Bo Zhu; Jingxian Chen; Huamu Chen; Fangyuan Yang; Yuting Chen; Qianwei Lai; Xuzhou Liu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-21

9.  Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States.

Authors:  William C Pannell; David D Savin; Trevor P Scott; Jeffrey C Wang; Michael D Daubs
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Allograft Versus Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Failure From a MOON Prospective Longitudinal Cohort.

Authors:  Christopher C Kaeding; Brian Aros; Angela Pedroza; Eric Pifel; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Warren R Dunn; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Rick W Wright; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.843

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Ian D Engler; Ehab M Nazzal; Jonathan F Dalton; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Jonathan D Hughes; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Della Villa; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament grafts display differential maturation patterns on magnetic resonance imaging following reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph A Panos; Kate E Webster; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Young age and high BMI are predictors of early revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study from the Swedish and Norwegian knee ligament registries based on 30,747 patients.

Authors:  Thorkell Snaebjörnsson; Eleonor Svantesson; David Sundemo; Olof Westin; Mikael Sansone; Lars Engebretsen; Eric Hamrin-Senorski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction With a BTB Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew W DeFazio; Emily J Curry; Michael J Gustin; David C Sing; Hussein Abdul-Rassoul; Richard Ma; Freddie Fu; Xinning Li
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-15

Review 5.  Autograft and Nonirradiated Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Demonstrate Similar Clinical Outcomes and Graft Failure Rates: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaydeep Dhillon; Matthew J Kraeutler; John W Belk; Eric C McCarty; Patrick C McCulloch; Anthony J Scillia
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.