Literature DB >> 17529851

Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty.

Eric Truy1, Anna Nuca Naiman, Clemence Pavillon, Darius Abedipour, Geneviève Lina-Granade, Muriel Rabilloud.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of ossicular chain reconstruction using hydroxyapatite (HA) and titanium (TI) prostheses. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study and case series.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients presenting chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma. INTERVENTION: Ossiculoplasty using partial or total HA and TI ossicular replacement prostheses (TORP and PORP, respectively). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were assessed at 2 months postoperatively to establish short-term results. Results of treatment for conductive hearing loss were reported according to guidelines. Available audiometric data at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were used to assess prosthesis stability. Average postoperative air-conduction gain, air-bone gap, and sensorineural hearing level were measured at four frequencies: 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. Statistical analyses compared outcomes for HA TORP versus TI TORP and HA PORP versus TI PORP.
RESULTS: Postoperative air-bone gap of less than 20 dB was obtained in 50% of HA TORP versus 45.8% of TI TORP cases and in 63.2% of HA PORP versus 72% of TI PORP cases. Preoperative middle ear status and presence/absence of malleus significantly influenced postoperative audiometric results. All types of prosthesis demonstrated significant postoperative air-conduction gain decrease on follow-up. Prosthesis exclusion was observed in three cases (1.78%).
CONCLUSION: Prostheses using both types of biomaterial gave good functional results and stability with low exclusion rates, with no statistically significant differences between the two. Trends could be observed for slightly better results for HA in total reconstruction and for TI in partial reconstruction. The degradation in postoperative functional gain seemed to be independent of prosthesis type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17529851     DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000265203.92743.d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  12 in total

1.  PORP vs. TORP: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huiqian Yu; Yingzi He; Yusu Ni; Yunfeng Wang; Na Lu; Huawei Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Results of Hearing Outcome According to the Alloplastic Ossicular Prosthesis Materials.

Authors:  Young-Seok Choi; See-Ok Shin
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-16

3.  The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Sultan Şevik Eliçora; Duygu Erdem; Aykut Erdem Dinç; Murat Damar; Sultan Bişkin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Evaluation of functional results of CWD surgery with ossicular replacement prosthesis due to cholesteatoma using computed tomography.

Authors:  Selcuk Ucar; Mete Iseri; Murat Ozturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Short-term hearing results using ossicular replacement prostheses of hydroxyapatite versus titanium.

Authors:  Jong-Ik Lee; Shin-Hyuk Yoo; Chang Wook Lee; Chan Il Song; Myung Hoon Yoo; Hong Ju Park
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  A Study of Use of Autologous Cartilage in Ossicular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Prakash Nagenahlli Siddappa; Puneeth Poojar Jayakumar; Dheeraj Kumar Jonnalagadda
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-10-19

7.  Passive and active middle ear implants.

Authors:  Dirk Beutner; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

8.  Surgical reconstruction of the ossicular chain with custom 3D printed ossicular prosthesis.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Hirsch; Richard L Vincent; David J Eisenman
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2017-07-27

9.  Anatomical and functional results of ossiculoplasty using titanium prosthesis.

Authors:  G Lahlou; G Sonji; D De Seta; I Mosnier; F Y Russo; O Sterkers; D Bernardeschi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Comparison of Titanium vs. Polycel Total Ossicular Replacement Prosthesis.

Authors:  Mohammad Faramarzi; Reza Jahangiri; Sareh Roosta
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.