Literature DB >> 25192921

Reliability and precision of 3D wireless measurement of scapular kinematics.

Josien C van den Noort1,2, Suzanne H Wiertsema3, Karin M C Hekman3, Casper P Schönhuth4, Joost Dekker3,5, Jaap Harlaar3,5.   

Abstract

To direct interventions aimed at improving scapular position and motion in shoulder pathologies, a clinically feasible, objective, sensitive and reliable assessment of scapular dyskinesis is needed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reliability and the precision of 3D scapula kinematics measurement using wireless sensors of an inertial and magnetic measurement system (IMMS). Scapular kinematics during humerus anteflexion and abduction of 20 subjects without shoulder pathologies were measured twice by two observers at two different days, using IMMS. Similar movement patterns and corresponding high intraclass correlation coefficients were found within (intra) and between (inter) observers, especially for scapular retraction/protraction (0.65-0.85) and medio/lateral rotation (0.56-0.91). Lowest reliability and highest difference in range of motion were observed for anterior/posterior tilt. Medio/lateral rotation and anterior/posterior tilt showed a high precision, with standard error of measurement being mostly below 5°. The inter-observer measurements of retraction/protraction showed lowest precision, reflected in systematic differences. This is caused by an offset in anatomical calibration of the sensors. IMMS enables easy and objective measurement of 3D scapula kinematics. Further research in a patient population should focus on clinical feasibility and validity for measurement of scapular dyskinesis. This would include the application of a scapula locator to enhance anatomical calibration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25192921     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-014-1186-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  39 in total

1.  Shoulder function and 3-dimensional scapular kinematics in people with and without shoulder impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Philip W McClure; Lori A Michener; Andrew R Karduna
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2006-08

2.  Comparison between tripod and skin-fixed recording of scapular motion.

Authors:  Carel G M Meskers; Michiel A J van de Sande; Jurriaan H de Groot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors.

Authors:  Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Andrea Giovanardi; Laura Rocchi; Angelo Davalli; Rinaldo Sacchetti
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  A method for the measurement of three-dimensional scapular movement.

Authors:  G R Johnson; P R Stuart; S Mitchell
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Intra-protocol repeatability and inter-protocol agreement for the analysis of scapulo-humeral coordination.

Authors:  I Parel; A G Cutti; A Kraszewski; G Verni; H Hillstrom; A Kontaxis
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  'Outwalk': a protocol for clinical gait analysis based on inertial and magnetic sensors.

Authors:  Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Alberto Ferrari; Pietro Garofalo; Michele Raggi; Angelo Cappello; Adriano Ferrari
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Scapular Summit 2009: introduction. July 16, 2009, Lexington, Kentucky.

Authors:  W Ben Kibler; Paula M Ludewig; Phil McClure; Tim L Uhl; Aaron Sciascia
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 8.  Scapular positioning and movement in unimpaired shoulders, shoulder impingement syndrome, and glenohumeral instability.

Authors:  F Struyf; J Nijs; J-P Baeyens; S Mottram; R Meeusen
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 9.  Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement.

Authors:  P M Ludewig; T M Cook
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-03

10.  A clinical method for identifying scapular dyskinesis, part 1: reliability.

Authors:  Philip McClure; Angela R Tate; Stephen Kareha; Dominic Irwin; Erica Zlupko
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dynamic scapular recognition exercise improves scapular upward rotation and shoulder pain and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ayman A Mohamed; Yih-Kuen Jan; Wadida H El Sayed; Mohamed E Abdel Wanis; Abeer A Yamany
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-06-14

2.  Effect of Adding Vertical Correction to Dynamic Scapular Recognition on Scapular Dyskinesis and Shoulder Disability in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis: A Randomized Clinical Study.

Authors:  Ayman A Mohamed; Motaz Alawna
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-04-04

3.  Studying upper-limb kinematics using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Cristina Roldán-Jiménez; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-10-03

4.  Anatomical Calibration through Post-Processing of Standard Motion Tests Data.

Authors:  Weisheng Kong; Salvatore Sessa; Massimiliano Zecca; Atsuo Takanishi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Studying Upper-Limb Kinematics Using Inertial Sensors Embedded in Mobile Phones.

Authors:  Cristina Roldan-Jimenez; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas; Paul Bennett
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2015-05-20

6.  Scapular Dyskinesis: From Basic Science to Ultimate Treatment.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Laura Risi Ambrogioni; Alessandra Berton; Vincenzo Candela; Carlo Massaroni; Arianna Carnevale; Giovanna Stelitano; Emiliano Schena; Ara Nazarian; Joseph DeAngelis; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Wearable systems for shoulder kinematics assessment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arianna Carnevale; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Emiliano Schena; Carlo Massaroni; Daniela Lo Presti; Alessandra Berton; Vincenzo Candela; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Effect of Force Level and Gender on Pinch Force Perception in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Lin Li; Yanxia Li; Huihui Wang; Wenqi Chen; Xinyu Liu
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-05-20

9.  A survey of human shoulder functional kinematic representations.

Authors:  Rakesh Krishnan; Niclas Björsell; Elena M Gutierrez-Farewik; Christian Smith
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Assessment of abduction motion in patients with rotator cuff tears: an analysis based on inertial sensors.

Authors:  Cristina Roldán-Jiménez; Miguel Cuadros-Romero; Paul Bennett; Steven McPhail; Graham K Kerr; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Jaime Martin-Martin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.