Literature DB >> 25192799

Working memory contents enhance perception under stimulus-driven competition.

Suk Won Han1.   

Abstract

It is well known that attention is biased toward a stimulus matching working memory contents. However, it has been debated at which processing stage this memory-driven attentional bias takes place. While some studies show that memory-driven attention affects the early, perceptual stage of information processing, others argue that the finding showing such an effect is the result of working memory contents reducing uncertainty regarding the location of a target stimulus, without affecting the perception of the target. The present study tested whether a previous finding showing the perceptual effect of memory-driven attention is solely due to reduced target location uncertainty. We found that attentional bias by working memory contents affected the perception of a target stimulus, especially when multiple stimuli were present, competing against each other. This perceptual effect was not due to reduced target location uncertainty because the target location was always indicated by a response cue. Similar results were found regardless of whether working memory contents predicted the target location or not. These findings suggest that automatic, involuntary orienting of attention by working memory contents affects perception by resolving stimulus-driven competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25192799     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0460-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  42 in total

1.  What variety of attention is automatically captured by peripheral cues?

Authors:  S J Luck; S J Thomas
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-10

2.  Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location.

Authors:  B A Dosher; Z L Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The reentry hypothesis: the putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, IT for attention and eye movement.

Authors:  Fred H Hamker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The contents of visual working memory reduce uncertainty during visual search.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Working memory enhances visual perception: evidence from signal detection analysis.

Authors:  David Soto; Alice Wriglesworth; Alex Bahrami-Balani; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Combined effects of feature-based working memory and feature-based attention on the perception of visual motion direction.

Authors:  Diego Mendoza; Megan Schneiderman; Christian Kaul; Julio Martinez-Trujillo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Attention: reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms.

Authors:  William Prinzmetal; Christin McCool; Samuel Park
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Perspectives on working memory: introduction to the special issue.

Authors:  Robert H Logie; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

2.  Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.

Authors:  Suk Won Han
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-09-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.