Literature DB >> 10572469

What variety of attention is automatically captured by peripheral cues?

S J Luck1, S J Thomas.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the voluntary allocation of attention to a location in space can influence accuracy in two ways. First, additional processing resources can be allocated to the attended location, leading to an improvement in perceptual quality for objects presented at that location. Second, decision processes can be restricted to information arising from the attended location, which improves accuracy without influencing the perceptual representation. The present study examined the operation of these two attentional mechanisms when nonpredictive peripheral cues were used to capture attention automatically. Experiment 1 showed that, like predictive cues, nonpredictive cues influence accuracy by summoning perceptual resources and also by influencing decision processes. However, both the cues and the targets in this experiment were defined by luminance increments, making it possible that the cuing effects were mediated by a task-controlled attentional set rather than being fully automatic. Experiments 2 and 3 examined this possibility by using luminance-defined cues and color-defined targets; evidence was again obtained for both perceptual-level and decision-level attention effects. The capture of attention by a nonpredictive peripheral cue thus appears to influence both perceptual resource allocation and postperceptual decision processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10572469     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  12 in total

1.  Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation.

Authors:  J Toby Mordkoff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Crossmodal exogenous orienting improves the accuracy of temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Attention is biased to near surfaces.

Authors:  Greg L West; Jay Pratt; Mary A Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

4.  Attention does more than modulate suppressive interactions: attending to multiple items.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Chandramalika Basak; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Exogenous attention can be counter-selective: onset cues disrupt sensitivity to color changes.

Authors:  Gisela Müller-Plath; Nils Klöckner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-03-22

6.  Working memory contents enhance perception under stimulus-driven competition.

Authors:  Suk Won Han
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

7.  Transient attention enhances perceptual performance and FMRI response in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Summation of visual motion across eye movements reflects a nonspatial decision mechanism.

Authors:  Adam P Morris; Charles C Liu; Simon J Cropper; Jason D Forte; Bart Krekelberg; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Intra- and cross-modal cuing of spatial attention: Time courses and mechanisms.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; Hennis Chi-Hang Tse; Barbara Anne Dosher; Luis A Lesmes; Christian Posner; Wilson Chu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; René Marois
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.