Literature DB >> 26293866

Information Technology for Clinical, Translational and Comparative Effectiveness Research. Findings from the Yearbook 2015 Section on Clinical Research Informatics.

C Daniel1, R Choquet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To summarize excellent current research in the field of Bioinformatics and Translational Informatics with application in the health domain and clinical care.
METHOD: We provide a synopsis of the articles selected for the IMIA Yearbook 2015, from which we attempt to derive a synthetic overview of current and future activities in the field. As last year, a first step of selection was performed by querying MEDLINE with a list of MeSH descriptors completed by a list of terms adapted to the section. Each section editor has evaluated separately the set of 1,594 articles and the evaluation results were merged for retaining 15 articles for peer-review.
RESULTS: The selection and evaluation process of this Yearbook's section on Bioinformatics and Translational Informatics yielded four excellent articles regarding data management and genome medicine that are mainly tool-based papers. In the first article, the authors present PPISURV a tool for uncovering the role of specific genes in cancer survival outcome. The second article describes the classifier PredictSNP which combines six performing tools for predicting disease-related mutations. In the third article, by presenting a high-coverage map of the human proteome using high resolution mass spectrometry, the authors highlight the need for using mass spectrometry to complement genome annotation. The fourth article is also related to patient survival and decision support. The authors present datamining methods of large-scale datasets of past transplants. The objective is to identify chances of survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The current research activities still attest the continuous convergence of Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, with a focus this year on dedicated tools and methods to advance clinical care. Indeed, there is a need for powerful tools for managing and interpreting complex, large-scale genomic and biological datasets, but also a need for user-friendly tools developed for the clinicians in their daily practice. All the recent research and development efforts contribute to the challenge of impacting clinically the obtained results towards a personalized medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical informatics; biomedical research; clinical research; patient selection; phenotyping

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26293866      PMCID: PMC4587062          DOI: 10.15265/IY-2015-030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yearb Med Inform        ISSN: 0943-4747


  18 in total

1.  Using electronic health records for clinical research: the case of the EHR4CR project.

Authors:  Georges De Moor; Mats Sundgren; Dipak Kalra; Andreas Schmidt; Martin Dugas; Brecht Claerhout; Töresin Karakoyun; Christian Ohmann; Pierre-Yves Lastic; Nadir Ammour; Rebecca Kush; Danielle Dupont; Marc Cuggia; Christel Daniel; Geert Thienpont; Pascal Coorevits
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Harmonization of detailed clinical models with clinical study data standards.

Authors:  G Jiang; J Evans; T A Oniki; J F Coyle; L Bain; S M Huff; R D Kush; C G Chute
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 3.  Clinical research data warehouse governance for distributed research networks in the USA: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  John H Holmes; Thomas E Elliott; Jeffrey S Brown; Marsha A Raebel; Arthur Davidson; Andrew F Nelson; Annie Chung; Pierre La Chance; John F Steiner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Epilepsy and seizure ontology: towards an epilepsy informatics infrastructure for clinical research and patient care.

Authors:  Satya S Sahoo; Samden D Lhatoo; Deepak K Gupta; Licong Cui; Meng Zhao; Catherine Jayapandian; Alireza Bozorgi; Guo-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Biobanks and electronic medical records: enabling cost-effective research.

Authors:  Erica Bowton; Julie R Field; Sunny Wang; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Sara L Van Driest; Jessica T Delaney; James Cowan; Peter Weeke; Jonathan D Mosley; Quinn S Wells; Jason H Karnes; Christian Shaffer; Josh F Peterson; Joshua C Denny; Dan M Roden; Jill M Pulley
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  BBMRI-ERIC as a resource for pharmaceutical and life science industries: the development of biobank-based Expert Centres.

Authors:  Gert-Jan B van Ommen; Outi Törnwall; Christian Bréchot; Georges Dagher; Joakim Galli; Kristian Hveem; Ulf Landegren; Claudio Luchinat; Andres Metspalu; Cecilia Nilsson; Ove V Solesvik; Markus Perola; Jan-Eric Litton; Kurt Zatloukal
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Technical challenges of providing record linkage services for research.

Authors:  James H Boyd; Sean M Randall; Anna M Ferrante; Jacqueline K Bauer; Adrian P Brown; James B Semmens
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  High throughput tools to access images from clinical archives for research.

Authors:  Shawn N Murphy; Christopher Herrick; Yanbing Wang; Taowei David Wang; Darren Sack; Katherine P Andriole; Jesse Wei; Nathaniel Reynolds; Wendy Plesniak; Bruce R Rosen; Steven Pieper; Randy L Gollub
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Exploiting the potential of large databases of electronic health records for research using rapid search algorithms and an intuitive query interface.

Authors:  A Rosemary Tate; Natalia Beloff; Balques Al-Radwan; Joss Wickson; Shivani Puri; Timothy Williams; Tjeerd Van Staa; Adrian Bleach
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Hidden in plain sight: bias towards sick patients when sampling patients with sufficient electronic health record data for research.

Authors:  Alexander Rusanov; Nicole G Weiskopf; Shuang Wang; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.