| Literature DB >> 25184236 |
Long-Hui Lin1, Lei Hua2, Yan-Fu Qu2, Jian-Fang Gao1, Xiang Ji2.
Abstract
The vulnerable Chinese cobra (Naja atra) ranges from southeastern China south of the Yangtze River to northern Vietnam and Laos. Large mountain ranges and water bodies may influence the pattern of genetic diversity of this species. We sequenced the mitochondrial DNA control region (1029 bp) using 285 individuals collected from 23 localities across the species' range and obtained 18 sequences unique to Taiwan from GenBank for phylogenetic and population analysis. Two distinct clades were identified, one including haplotypes from the two westernmost localities (Hekou and Miyi) and the other including haplotypes from all sampling sites except Miyi. A strong population structure was found (Φst = 0.76, P<0.0001) with high haplotype diversity (h = 1.00) and low nucleotide diversity (π = 0.0049). The Luoxiao and Nanling Mountains act as historical geographical barriers limiting gene exchange. In the haplotype network there were two "star" clusters. Haplotypes from populations east of the Luoxiao Mountains were represented within one cluster and haplotypes from populations west of the mountain range within the other, with haplotypes from populations south of the Nanling Mountains in between. Lineage sorting between mainland and island populations is incomplete. It remains unknown as to how much adaptive differentiation there is between population groups or within each group. We caution against long-distance transfers within any group, especially when environmental differences are apparent.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25184236 PMCID: PMC4153689 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Samples sites, number of haplotypes (N), haplotype diversity (h), nucleotide diversity (π), Fu's Fs, τ, sum of squared deviation (SSD), and Harpending's raggedness index (HRI) for Naja. atra.
| Code | Sample site | Genetic diversity | Neutrality | Mismatch distribution | ||||
|
|
|
| Fu's | SSD | HRI |
| ||
| TE | Eastern TaiwanE | 5 | 0.649 | 0.077 | −1.613NS | – | – | |
| TN | Northern TaiwanE | 6 | 0.556 | 0.068 | −2.865* | – | – | |
| TW | Western TaiwanE | 8 | 0.800 | 0.149 | −2.176NS | 0.006* | 0.054*** | |
| TS | Southern TaiwanE | 12 | 0.920 | 0.227 | −5.633** | – | – | |
| ZS | Zhoushan islandsE | 2 | 0.514 | 0.100 | 2.710NS | 0.195*** | 0.765*** | |
| HS | HuangshanE | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | |
| LI | LishuiE | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | |
| JY | JianyangE | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | |
| YA | Yong'anE | 2 | 0.250 | 0.024 | −0.182NS | 0.001NS | 0.313NS | |
| YD | YongdingE | 2 | 0.327 | 0.032 | 0.356NS | 0.003NS | 0.226NS | |
| JA | Ji'anE | 4 | 0.821 | 0.146 | −0.422NS | – | – | |
| GZ | GanzhouE | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | |
| WY | WengyuanS | 5 | 0.818 | 0.214 | 0.005NS | 0.050NS | 0.164NS | |
| ZQ | ZhaoqingS | 7 | 0.886 | 0.283 | −0.779NS | 0.018* | 0.075*** | |
| HN | Hainan islandS | 3 | 0.530 | 0.159 | 2.884NS | 0.233*** | 0.639NS | |
| VN | VietnamS | 5 | 0.782 | 0.253 | 0.588NS | 0.178*** | 0.515*** | |
| BS | BaiseS | 3 | 0.714 | 0.167 | 1.243NS | 0.060NS | 0.204NS | |
| HK | HekouW | 4 | 0.725 | 0.572 | 5.544NS | 0.099*** | 0.260* | |
| MY | MiyiW | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | |
| GL | GuanlingW | 2 | 0.133 | 0.039 | 0.834NS | 0.026*** | 0.787NS | |
| LS | LeishanW | 3 | 0.676 | 0.098 | 0.948NS | 0.013NS | 0.112NS | |
| QZ | QuanzhouW | 2 | 0.525 | 0.051 | 1.333NS | – | – | |
| CZ | ChenzhouW | 2 | 0.429 | 0.042 | 0.536NS | – | – | |
| YZ | YongzhouW | 3 | 0.641 | 0.080 | 0.375NS | – | – | |
| ZJ | ZhijiangW | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | |
| ST | SongtaoW | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | |
| JS | JinshiW | 2 | 0.400 | 0.039 | 0.872NS | – | – | |
| E: Eastern populations | 26 | 0.804 | 0.175 | −16.854*** | 0.001 NS | 0.028 NS | 1.824 | |
| S: Southern populations | 19 | 0.903 | 0.306 | −5.974* | 0.020 * | 0.060* | ||
| W: Western populations | 13 | 0.885 | 0.498 | 2.366 NS | 0.010 NS | 0.016 NS | ||
Superscripts denote population sources. *0.05 ≧ P ≧ 0.01; **0.01>P ≧ 0.001; ***P<0.001; NS, not significant
Figure 1Maximum-likelihood tree for all 52 haplotypes of Naja atra, with Ophiophagus hannah and Bungarus fasciatus as the outgroup taxa. Labels are haplotype identification numbers.
Values on the right side of the nodes indicate support for each node based on maximum likelihood. Bootstrap values below 60% are not shown. The value of 0.363 mya above the branch indicates the divergence time between the eastern population groups and the other two population groups.
Figure 2Network of 52 mitochondrial control region haplotypes from 390 individuals of Naja atra.
The size of the circles is proportional to haplotype frequency; small open circles represent unsampled haplotypes. See Table 1 for sample site abbreviations.
Figure 3Sampling locations of Naja atra in this study.
See Table 1 for sample site abbreviations. Solid lines indicate mountain series.