BACKGROUND: Patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are candidates for surgical intervention with curative intent. For these early-stage lung cancer surgeries, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is considered. The purpose of this article is to propose a recommendation for this according to the evidence and provide information for patients with operable early-stage lung cancer from the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery. The clinical question here is whether VATS lobectomy is recommended for patients with clinical stage I NSCLC. METHODS: The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery guidelines committee reviewed and summarized the available literature and assessed the quality of the evidence. The available literature on VATS was examined using references from MEDLINE. The recommendations were provided according to the Medical Information Network Distribution Service in Japan (Minds). RESULTS: VATS lobectomy may be considered and applied to patients with clinical stage I NSCLC; however, well-established evidence is lacking. VATS showed better or at least equivalent outcomes regarding intra- or postoperative complications compared with thoracotomy, with less invasiveness. Additionally, long-term survival by VATS lobectomy was suggested to be at least equivalent, although there is a lack of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: VATS lobectomy by an experienced surgeon is associated with minimal invasiveness and an outcome equivalent to that of open lobectomy in stage I NSCLC. (Recommendation grade: Level C1).
BACKGROUND:Patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are candidates for surgical intervention with curative intent. For these early-stage lung cancer surgeries, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is considered. The purpose of this article is to propose a recommendation for this according to the evidence and provide information for patients with operable early-stage lung cancer from the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery. The clinical question here is whether VATS lobectomy is recommended for patients with clinical stage I NSCLC. METHODS: The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery guidelines committee reviewed and summarized the available literature and assessed the quality of the evidence. The available literature on VATS was examined using references from MEDLINE. The recommendations were provided according to the Medical Information Network Distribution Service in Japan (Minds). RESULTS: VATS lobectomy may be considered and applied to patients with clinical stage I NSCLC; however, well-established evidence is lacking. VATS showed better or at least equivalent outcomes regarding intra- or postoperative complications compared with thoracotomy, with less invasiveness. Additionally, long-term survival by VATS lobectomy was suggested to be at least equivalent, although there is a lack of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: VATS lobectomy by an experienced surgeon is associated with minimal invasiveness and an outcome equivalent to that of open lobectomy in stage I NSCLC. (Recommendation grade: Level C1).
Authors: Walter J Scott; Mark S Allen; Gail Darling; Bryan Meyers; Paul A Decker; Joe B Putnam; Robert W McKenna; Rodney J Landrenau; David R Jones; Richard I Inculet; Richard A Malthaner Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2010-02-20 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Subroto Paul; Nasser K Altorki; Shubin Sheng; Paul C Lee; David H Harpole; Mark W Onaitis; Brendon M Stiles; Jeffrey L Port; Thomas A D'Amico Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Matthew J Schuchert; Brian L Pettiford; Arjun Pennathur; Ghulam Abbas; Omar Awais; John Close; Arman Kilic; Robert Jack; James R Landreneau; Joshua P Landreneau; David O Wilson; James D Luketich; Rodney J Landreneau Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Raja M Flores; Ugonna N Ihekweazu; Nabil Rizk; Joseph Dycoco; Manjit S Bains; Robert J Downey; Prasad Adusumilli; David J Finley; James Huang; Valerie W Rusch; Inderpal Sarkaria; Bernard Park Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: David S Ettinger; Wallace Akerley; Hossein Borghaei; Andrew C Chang; Richard T Cheney; Lucian R Chirieac; Thomas A D'Amico; Todd L Demmy; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Ramaswamy Govindan; Frederic W Grannis; Leora Horn; Thierry M Jahan; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Anne Kessinger; Ritsuko Komaki; Feng-Ming Kong; Mark G Kris; Lee M Krug; Inga T Lennes; Billy W Loo; Renato Martins; Janis O'Malley; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Gregory A Otterson; Jyoti D Patel; Mary C Pinder-Schenck; Katherine M Pisters; Karen Reckamp; Gregory J Riely; Eric Rohren; Scott J Swanson; Douglas E Wood; Stephen C Yang; Miranda Hughes; Kristina M Gregory Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Raja M Flores; Bernard J Park; Joseph Dycoco; Anna Aronova; Yael Hirth; Nabil P Rizk; Manjit Bains; Robert J Downey; Valerie W Rusch Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 5.209