Literature DB >> 25182366

Prognostic value of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients after heart transplant.

Brian A Mc Ardle1, Ross A Davies1, Li Chen1, Gary R Small1, Terrence D Ruddy1, Girish Dwivedi1, Yeung Yam1, Haissam Haddad1, Lisa M Mielniczuk1, Ellamae Stadnick1, Renee Hessian1, Ann Guo1, Rob S Beanlands1, Robert A deKemp1, Benjamin J W Chow2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is a key prognostic determinant after heart transplant. Detection and risk stratification of patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy are problematic. Positron emission tomography using rubidium-82 allows quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow and may have utility for risk stratification in this population. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients with a history of heart transplant undergoing dipyridamole rubidium-82 positron emission tomography were prospectively enrolled. Myocardial perfusion and left ventricular ejection fraction were recorded. Absolute flow quantification at rest and after dipyridamole stress as well as the ratio of mean global flow at stress and at rest, termed myocardial flow reserve, were calculated. Patients were followed for all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure hospitalization. A total of 140 patients (81% men; median age, 62 years; median follow-up, 18.2 months) were included. There were 14 events during follow-up (9 deaths, 1 acute coronary syndrome, and 4 heart failure admissions). In addition to baseline clinical variables (estimated glomerular filtration rate, previously documented cardiac allograft vasculopathy), relative perfusion defects, mean myocardial flow reserve, and mean stress myocardial blood flow were significant predictors of adverse outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormalities on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography were predictors of adverse events in heart transplant patients. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart transplantation; positron emission tomography; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25182366     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  29 in total

Review 1.  Transplant allograft vasculopathy: Role of multimodality imaging in surveillance and diagnosis.

Authors:  Gregory A Payne; Fadi G Hage; Deepak Acharya
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Proceedings of the Cardiac PET Summit, 12 May 2014, Baltimore, MD : 3: Quantitation of myocardial blood flow.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; K Lance Gould; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Imaging in patients with advanced therapies for heart failure.

Authors:  Joanna M Joly; Steven G Lloyd
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Quantification of PET Myocardial Blood Flow.

Authors:  Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Patrick Martineau; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  The potential for PET-guided revascularization of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Should positron emission tomography be the standard of care for non-invasive surveillance following cardiac transplantation?

Authors:  Robert J H Miller; Jon A Kobashigawa; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  New developments for the detection and treatment of cardiac vasculopathy.

Authors:  Kevin J Clerkin; Ziad A Ali; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Measurement of MBF by PET is ready for prime time as an integral part of clinical reports in diagnosis and risk assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD-PRO.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Safety of regadenoson positron emission tomography stress testing in orthotopic heart transplant patients.

Authors:  John J Lazarus; Ashraf Saleh; Michael Ghannam; Keith Aaronson; Monica Colvin; Frank Pagani; Todd Koelling; James R Corbett; Richard L Weinberg; Venkatesh L Murthy; Matthew C Konerman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.